Early Release Program

In the Sacramento Bee I read an article, Federal judge says California early release program can't exclude male inmates written by Danny Walsh; this early release program could not be settled for just females inmates alone because it was seen unconstitutional and must include both genders into the inmate program to lessen sentence to uniting families. The case asserted that California illegally separates on the basis of gender by permitting female inmates, but not male inmates, allowing male inmates to join in the Alternative Custody Program is what the the article argued to allowing qualified male inmates to participate in the Alternative Custody Program. The judge required by the Fourteenth Amendment, will benefit children and families from single female and male families. The justification for the program seems to have a lot to do with the overcrowding of prisons along with the cost of nonviolent crimes. The female inmates being a smaller population, compared to male inmates, yet it seem by the judges that they're ignoring are male inmates for this early release Alternative Custody Program based off of a gender sentences for the same crime.
For example, Judge Morris England of the Eastern District of California agreed …show more content…
A Alternative Custody Program that’s fair to both genders will surely benefit from a non-violent offenses help strengthen its family’s core and there childs need for parents. The program for inmates would force people to think about when the law should apply and how a ruling can affect families. however only applying to female inmate people would probably be willing to classify gender difference in prison time being handed out the same for both genders for example when a female rapes someone imprisonment should be just as long as a male