Abel Fields Violation Of The Stolen Valor Act

Decent Essays
Abel Fields was convicted for giving false information about serving in the military as well as claiming to recieve a prestigious medal that he did not. Under the Stolen Valor Act, it is a crime to make false claims about receiving military medals and awards. They claim that violating the Stolen Valor Act could result in a fine and/or imprisonment up to six months. The claims that Field's made were completely false, thus violating the Stolen Valor Act and Fields was fined $1,000.

Some lower courts claim that "to be convicted, the one in question must be proven to be acting out of malice when violating this act." Unde this precedent, the judgement of the lower courts said that because he had not been acting in malice, his decision

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Name: Anthony Douglas Elonis, Petitioner, v. United States., No. 13-983 (2014) Factual History: Anthony Douglas Elonis actively uses Facebook, a social networking Web site. After seven years of marriage, Elonis’s wife left him and took their two young children with her. Elonis changed his user name on Facebook to a fake name. He posted a threating photo of one of his co-workers and himself on Halloween. After his co-worker’s found out about the photo, Elonis posted a status threating to kill multiple friends and co-workers.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Straw Purchaser Analysis

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The “straw purchaser” stipulation was a harmless error because it did not affect the outcome of the District Court proceedings. While Kotteakos, as Petitioner may point out, concluded that the proper test was not whether the jury’s decision was correct, but rather the error’s potential effect on the jury’s decision-making, recent interpretations of harmless error analysis suggest a departure from this holding. See Kotteakos v. United States, 68 S.Ct. 1247 (1946). The Court’s analysis in recent years has dealt specifically with the sufficiency of evidence for conviction when the error is removed.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Elonis Vs Us Case Study

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Elonis v. United States 575 U.S. ___ (2015) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 13 – 983 Argued December 1, 2014 – Decided June 1, 2015 Apples to: First Amendment Facts: After his wife left him, Anthony Elonis used Facebook to post his own rap lyrics. Along with his wife, his co-worker, boss, a kindergarten class, and an FBI agent were all mentioned in his lyrics.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Enron Scandal Case

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judges who make bad decisions in these matters may have to be overturned in appeal courts. Case 3.1 Estate of Weingeroff vs Pilatus…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Decision Making

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What is the role of legal rules in judicial decision making? Compare and contrast the perspectives of formalists, the American Legal Realists and HLA Hart. How do judges apply the law? This question has stimulated many theories about how far legal rules guide a judge when it comes to their foremost job: decision making. Does a judge simply just apply rules to the facts of the case?…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Truth, Error, and Criminal Law Larry Laudan presents aspects of the law that he believes should be changed to maintain an epistemic goal of the criminal justice system. He argues that the court system frequently maintains rules that seek to distribute the verdicts so that we have less false convictions than false acquittals whether these rules will aid the system in seeking the truth or not. One of the primary principles currently in place that he believes should be amended is the “Silent Defendant” rule, as he calls it, which allows the defendant the choice of whether to testify or not, and their choice to not testify cannot cause negative inferences from the jury. He believes that allowing the defendant not to speak as well as…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stolen Valor Case Study

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this Supreme Court Abel Fields is found not guilty. In 2011, 39 year old Fields was convicted in California for falsely speaking of serving in the military for eight years and receiving a Purple Heart. He was in violation of the Stolen Valor act. The Stolen Valor act protects the veterans who receive a Purple Heart after being wounded in war. In his previous ruling he was found guilty.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was also argued by Mr David Vaughan that it is up to the court to determine interpret an act of parliament considering all things, including previous acts and also noted by him that simply because certain conditions are applied to a later Act as a result of a previous act that would not otherwise be applied then that does not challenge the sovereignty of…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am of the mindset that all advocates are lawyers but not all lawyers are advocates. That is, anyone with a law degree is a lawyer but to be an advocate is to stand in a court, whether that’s one of public opinion or of the law, and persuasively represent a client, cause, or policy. Learning to become an effective advocate through this moot process has required developing good advocacy practices as well as having a lot of patience. The advocacy practices I have developed include the ability to distill facts, organize them, and a draft a persuasively written factum and use that document to persuade an audience to arrive at the same conclusion as I. It was required of us to submit our factum prior to the moot, the written argument thus provided…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mechanical importation of the criteria of ‘forum non conveniens’ to anti-suit injunctions was criticized on the ground that while the atonement of criteria in respect of stay of proceedings meant greater submission towards international comity, when the same criteria were applied in reverse for the granting of anti-suit injunctions it resulted in an unnecessary and unjustified interference with the foreign proceedings. Nevertheless, the reasoning adopted in Castahno was adopted in subsequent cases, including Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd vs Bloch , British Airways Board v Laker Airways Ltd and South Carolina Insurance Co v Assurantie Maatschappij. The reasoning of Castahno was, subsequently, ‘officially’ shot down in Aerospatiale…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will critically analyse inclusive legal positivism and will provide with arguments why it is a positivistic theory of law in name only. To do so, it will explore the essence of what legal positivism is by discussing the issues concerning morality and authority. The main argument of soft positivism being a positivistic theory in name only will consist of the assertion that the presence of morality in it makes it contradict with the essence of positivism, namely, that a connection between legality and moral truth cannot exist. This essay will criticise inclusive positivism based on exclusive positivism’s characteristics which will be considered to form the definition of legal positivism. Legal positivism believes that law is a closed…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. When Asserting a Legal Principle Example: Intent is a required element of the plaintiff’s claim. Crenshaw v. Baldwin, 115 Cal. App. 4th 553, 557 (1979). 1.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (2002), in The Court of Appeal in the Criminal division the rules are the same except that the court need not to follow its own previous decisions where this case would cause injustice to the appellant, the reason is that where human freedom is at stake the need for justice exceeds the need for certainty.- R v GOULD (1968). The high court is bound by its own previous decisions subject to the rule of Young’s case and in the criminal court cases, R v GOULD. In the high court in the sense of judges at first instance, their decisions are not binding on other high court judges. In inferior courts, for example magistrate courts, they are not bound by their previous decisions due to the fact that they are less authoritative and cases are reported less. In all instances if cases are not binding the statements given are not irrelevant.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body” 1 Cardozo J in Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital “It would be unrealistic to suppose the principle here affirmed will not over time be the subject of incremental and analogical development. At the very least this case shows that where justice and policy demand it a modification of causation principles is not beyond the wit of a modern court. The right of autonomy and dignity can and ought to be vindicated by a narrow and modest departure from traditional causation principles. A result which he deemed to be in accord with one of the most basic aspirations of the law, namely to right wrongs”.…

    • 10936 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Great Essays