Democracy And Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY AND MULTICULTURALISM

Democracy is one of the most controversial concepts (issues) in social sciences. It means very roughly ‘’sovereignty of people’’. In this frame, democracy emphasizes that power is in the hands of the people. Democracy can be different from society to society (people to people). The root of the word of democracy means ‘’ people’s power (sovereignty)’’. It is originally comes from Greek. ‘’Demos’’ means people, ‘’kratos’’ means power. Democracy is the people’s sovereignty (power), but which people and power? The answers that are given to these two questions causes the emergence of different democratic types and they make democracy is one of most controversial issues. There are so many
…show more content…
When we talk about Greek democracy we think about direct democracy. In the early times of Roman Empire direct democracy turned into indirect democracy. After a long period without democratic governance classical (liberal) democracy has emerged after the French Revolution. After that with the emergence of proletariat socialist democracy (Marxist democracy) has emerged. Therefore, when we look at the historical process of democracy we see that it has been shaped and named differently from society to society, time to time. Since classical (liberal) democracy couldn’t satisfy contemporary demands and needs of the people, social scientists and philosophers have searched for alternative types of it. Deliberative democracy is one of the results of this search. The concept of deliberative democracy is a ‘’normative theory’’. It suggests so many ways to improve democracy and it criticizes the institutions which cannot reach this normative …show more content…
Since there are so many different cultures, groups and identities in a multicultural society and all of them are allowed to participate in the process of decision-making and discussions in the model of deliberative democracy, citizens of the society would start to understand each other and they can learn empathy. The society would become more open to different ideas and it would become more respectful society. Since the discussions are based on freedom, reasonableness and equality and all people have an equal say and the decision that is made is the common conclusion, different groups and identities would understand that they are treated equally. So many different opinions are being presented in this decision-making process. Thanks to that people would see that what they cannot see and they maybe would start to think in an alternative way. In this deliberation process there might be a strong communication between state and different groups. There may be a good political culture in that society. And different groups and identities would learn how to live together in a peaceful and respectful

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Democracy Exuberance

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This would have had to occur without a social consensus, not all social would have agreed with the shift. Often, the imposition of a democratic order is linked to radical redistributive programs. Effectively, this is the “linkage effect.” The result is the polarization between the pro-democratic and the anti-democratic oppositions through coalitions and movements. This further enhanced the development of democratic instability, escalates into collective violence, and creates constitutional deadlock. Eventually, Democracy would decline into either an authoritarianism of the left (communism) or right (fascism).…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Democratic Stability

    • 2278 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The problem of democratic instability roots from the idea of a faulty institutional design. Modern states all have institutional mechanisms between the opponents and the supporters of democracy (Magagna, Lecture 24 January 2016). The conditions of democratic change along with stability and instability is what is critical to the explanation. Firstly, market logic displayed that as society became more commercial and market relations became more centralized, democratic ideals will also be promoted at the same time. Nevertheless, the market logic does not always apply.…

    • 2278 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we think of the political theorists Hobbes, Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, and Marx we often tend to catagorize them as one thing, undemocratic. In each one of their political theories they either criticize or lay out their concerns for being against democracy, some more severe on the opinion than others. Each laid out various explanations in their writings for why democracy isn 't the feasible way to run a government. While all of these theorists use democracy as a defense for why their political doctrines about how the government should be run should be applied to real life I think that there are a few of these arguments that would not hold substantial weight in the political world if they had not used democracy as a defense such as John…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, inadequately significant role is given to the leader who is supposed to make the decisions for the people as a whole. Moreover, representative democracy is necessarily based on a compromise. However, populism expresses a such strong opposition to "the other" (as for example, political elite) that compromises become impossible (Pasquino, 2008). Likewise, Nadia Urbinati claims that populism is dangerous for democracy because it attempts to centralize the power and rejects procedurality (Urbinati, 2014, Chapter3). The election (as a procedure) and political forum (as a discussion) are necessary for a competition, a reflection, and a choice of the ideas.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Person has to reach a collective decision with the people who have different perspectives. This can be another advantage. To mention, examine and argue about different information can increase the knowledge of all participants about the social issues. Thus, each person is able to see how their perspectives affect others. On the long ground multiculturalism can transform into an advantage for continuity of societies.…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This last characteristic of Politics is the most controversial one causing interests and principles of one nation to clash with the ones of a different nation, which then causes to International Politics to change its purpose from achievement to conflict resolution. Thinkers such as Thucydides, Machiavelli and Hobbes have described International Politics as realist, where there is a constant struggle for power.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The leaders usually abuse the powers and privileges given to them and thus according to him, democracy is undesirable in many ways. He explains that many democracies seem to function well but in the real sense the people are being deceived in several ways that there is always the need to be skeptic and evaluate the government of the day in a more subjective manner. These are very important aspects of democracy because if there is a check and balance system which is often provided by the media, then democracy would function well (Heidegger, 2002). Herman and Chomsky explain that the media should be used to check the government of the day that is owned by the powerful people in the government. This leads to news being tilted towards the view that the government is good and when the government has done something wrong, it is not relayed to the people for fear of an…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Authority and Democracy are both very important factors within society, in regards to the state and the people within society, philosophers such as Plato and J.S Mill both discussed and formed opinions of both authority and democracy. However, both of their views appear to be very different in terms of distribution of education amongst society and the extent of political truth. Throughout this essay, both Plato and J.S Mill’s theories will be explained and analysed to show the differences and also similarities between the two of their views. Authority is the power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience amongst others. Society automatically accept the right of the state to actively use their power.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    History is riddled with instances of civil disobedience. Most would agree that, for some issues, it is required to change a law that is unjust. Even in a society that established a democracy as far back as its ideological conception, some issues seem to be only resolvable through decisive acts of insubordination. A valid point that is often times raised is: what is the point of a democracy if some issues have to be solved through civil disobedience? More specifically, this point is the centerpiece of Lewis H. Van Dusen, Jr.’s essay titled “Civil Disobedience: Destroyer of Democracy.” However, civil disobedience is required when a society, leader, or government is oppressing the demographic demanding change, or is participating in something…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    French Leadership Styles

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “People are social entities, interacting in groups and societies” (G. Goethals, G. Sorenson, J. Burn 2004a p. 332). The group members are freely open to discuss and exchange their ideas. The leader places more importance on rewards then punishment. As this style mostly focuses on equality and openness of ideas, the leader is present to offer guidance and control.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays