Utilitarianism And Democracy

Improved Essays
Like many of my classmates have said in their blogs, utilitarianism threatens the rights of individuals. Every individual is born with certain rights, such as the right to freedom and we are all equal. The mere idea of utilitarianism threatens our right to freedom. Being free means that we have the ability to make decisions that are best for us as a member of society. If we lived in a utilitarian society, our right to freedom would be violated because we would be doing what is best for the majority of society, not what everyone wants to be done. Tori brought up Michael Sandel’s example about the doctor contemplating killing one health patient in order to save the lives of 5 sick individuals. The rights of the one health individual would be violated if the doctor decides to kill him because he has the right to live and make decisions for himself. Killing him may satisfy the utilitarianism theory, however, it directly violates his individual rights. Utilitarianism threatens the rights of every individual living today because it only cares about what is best for society and not what …show more content…
Democracy is a form of utilitarianism, in my opinion, however, a democracy does what the people want and protects the rights of every individual. This idea is shown through the Supreme Court. As citizens we may have wanted a certain law to be passed because we believed it would protect us from a certain threat, however, the Supreme Court may declare the law as unconstitutional because it violates the rights of a certain group. One example of this that comes right to my mind is slavery. If the US was a utilitarian government, slavery probably would have been allowed because it benefited a large amount of the country and only “harmed” one group. However, because the US is a democracy, the Supreme Court ruled that slavery was unconstitutional because it violated the rights of one

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism, although interesting in theory by being the best for the most people, is simply not a feasible task. Utilitarianism disregards basic human rights for each individual. As mentioned in The Benefits of Lung Cancer that the Czech government thought about increasing the tax rate on cigarettes, but after a cost benefit analysis by Phillip Morris proved that the cigarettes are actually saving the government money. This is due to smokers dying earlier and saving the government money in the long term due to not having to pay “health care, pensions and housing for the elderly” (Sandel, p. 42). This is another prime example of how the cost benefit analysis that companies impose on people can be misleading and degrading to human life.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in the case of physician-assisted suicide, there are no apparent social consequences for the actions of the patient. In Dr. Quill’s account, Diane’s decision to end her suffering did not contribute to any negative social consequences. As Arras demonstrates in the case above, there are crucial flaws with adopting an entirely rights-based society. Nevertheless, a rights-based approach provides a unique perspective in favor of physician-assisted death. The Utilitarian…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Allowing what is best for the greatest number of people helping make your moral decisions is a tool that can be very useful, but also can lead to some really tough decisions. Having a complete utilitarian society could possibly spoil individual’s entire life as they are not focusing on their own happiness, but everyone that their moral decision will affect. This might lead them to lead a life making decisions that never fulfill their own happiness but only those around them. I have no argument against the fact that the utilitarian concept sounds very fair and sounds like it would work. But after actually thinking deeper into what a utilitarian society would be like, I conclude utilitarian values only work in doses, and that is why we only have a few examples in contemporary…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    People have long tried to interpret ethics in societies. Who, how, and why ethics was created are common debates among philosophers. In its simplest form, ethics can be described as how a differentiates between right and wrong. Whether that be due to society’s standards or their own, there are many theories to explain this daily-occurring phenomenon. Kantianism, the divine command theory, existentialism, ethical relativism, the virtue theory, and utilitarianism are the more widely known theories to describe how ethics came to be what we know today.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brave New World: The negative effects of a utilitarian society Aldous Hayley’s Brave New World introduces us to a dystopian society where everyone adheres to a system out of their control. In this world state “everyone belongs to everyone else”. Happiness is found in drugs and sex, monogamy is unheard of and basic human emotion has been distorted into something unrecognizable.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the same ways that Kantian ethics has some downsides, utilitarianism has some upsides to it. Firstly Kantian ethics doesn’t guarantee a positive outcome or consequence due to the fact that Kantian ethics doesn’t dwell on consequences. You many do have proper motivation, but end up with an immoral consequence. The classic example here is if you were hiding Jews in your house during WWII and some Nazis showed up. If you follow Kantian ethics, it’s in your duty to tell the truth and tell these soldiers that you do indeed have Jews in your house.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Being a Utilitarian evaluates consequences and the choices that situations bring upon someone to determine whether they are right or wrong. While taking this into consideration the action on the overall happiness of society is important. John Stuart Mill believes in utilitarianism, for example he does not believe ones sole happiness is more important than all those who are concerned. As some may know Mill favors inductive reasoning for being systematic. Mill comes to the conclusion that no matter the circumstances there is no grey area it is either good or bad; extremely straight forward.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Democracy is defined as a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. Two very well-known men defined in a different way. William Inge, an English author and priest saw democracy as the fact that everyone's vote is worth the same but most people aren’t educated enough to know about the politicians and what they are lying about and what they are telling the truth about. Another well-known man was Abraham Lincoln, the president, didn’t like the democracy way. He didn’t agree with it because he thinks that everyone is equal and that nobody has the right to make decisions that will affect another person’s life.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second flaw to utilitarianism is that does dehumanize ethics. Even though it is the best part about utilitarianism that it is objective and tries to have ethics based on facts and in logic it is too dehumanizing. When you are just looking at numbers when doing the calculus, it tears away the true value of these numbers that are supposed to represent. These numbers are supposed to values of a human being. When you make a decision based off of these number we must keep in mind the decision is still affecting people with lives and…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics Of Care Essay

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Humans thrive on the ability to make choices and have options. Choices allow for the greatest individuals benefit and ensures that we survive by making the best decisions for our well-being. Modern society has evolved in a way where we are no longer in constant danger for our lives, but instead, are looking for ways to thrive. Utilitarianism is a well-known moral theory that bases itself on the universal principle of utility which is described as “always acting in ways that maximize happiness and minimizing harm for the aggregate”. A theory such as Utilitarianism is very attractive and makes moral sense intuitively.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When time is of the essence, utilitarianism can be a guide when we need to make a moral decision. It allows us to think with her heart and emotions, and not just our brains. This is what makes us different from animals and has enabled us to evolve into the people we are today. Utilitarianism allows people to live a happier life because they can make the choices that are best for them, their friends, and…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. Endowing to the classical utilitarian moral theory, we classify human acts or practices as we consider neither the nature of the acts or practices nor the motive for which people do what they do. This can harvest to one’s action; that a life conceivably is saved, which matters morally. There is no total distinction between what is right and what is wrong based on Bentham’s view, only if the consequences are the highest favorable for the person’s greatest happiness, even including the majority of the people related to this person who is responsible to give that action. Drawing a conclusion about utilitarianism, it is our duty to decide which action or practice is best by considering the likely or actual consequences of each substitute.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is so the future is understood better (Cave, 2011, p.62). Also, Utilitarianism has an unprejudiced concern for the overall welfare of people Utilitarianism allows minimal pain on humans and animals as much as possible which is seen to be a good thing as there will be minimal suffering (Cave, 2011 p.62). Additionally, Utilitarianism focuses on human flourishing which can be argues as an Aristotelian direction to be able to understand this. Likewise with Deontology, Utilitarianism has fixed principles that is unlikely to change, for instance, not killing. This allows individuals to rely on the moral theory and to perform their own rights democratically to go with the majority to become fair (Cave, 2011 p.64).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays