Essay On The Impact Of Referendums On Democracy

Great Essays
What is the impact of referendums on democracy? Include examples from the UK and other countries.
A referendum is a direct vote in which an entire electorate is asked to vote on a particular proposal. This may result in the adoption of new constitution, a constitutional amendment, or a law. Whether referendums are initiated by governments, presidents or voters the issues can differ from constitutional amendments, electoral system change and national independence to EU membership and EU treaties. ‘Referendums are universal. Of the major democracies only the US, India, Japan and Israel have never experienced one at the nationwide level, and the US, of course, has had thousands in individual states. The referendums have varied enormously
…show more content…
Ot PURVATA Ot purvate p.36
Dolu 58 str.
‘In democratic countries, referendums are generally a hindrance to absolute power; the voters exercise a democratic veto on the executive.’

OT http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZbXseWgXElEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=referendums&hl=bg&sa=X&ei=pdp8VKGbE8SkPLL2gcAF&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=referendums&f=false
p.2
Democracy means a government by the people. Yet in many the role of the citizens was limited to periodic general elections and occasional referendums. This perception has changed in recent years, with the governments holding several referendums on issues ranging from devolution to the European constitution.’
The role of referendums is extremely important.
A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People, Second Edition
Mads Qvortrup
Manchester University Press,2005
p.2
‘Consider, for example, the Danish Euro referendum in June 1992. Following a national debate (and more than 1,300 newspaper articles), a narrow majority of 50.1 per cent of the Danish voters rejected the Maastricht Treaty, which was endorsed by all the major political parties in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This can help partisan politics become a source of major controversy. Faithless electors are those who are elected by one party or the other to be placed on the EC and when the election comes around, they will vote in the favor of the other party. Some states with very separated partisan sections can impose fines to ensure the vote of the elector will go to the state’s majority party. Seeing as the EC gives the illusion that states allocating EC votes to the majority vote winner in that state, the citizen population believes that their vote gives more influence to our electoral process. Which is why civilians see the EC as a partner in politics.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Presidential election system of the United States is done by the participation of the people, the Congress, the State Government and the Electoral candidates. Although there are four segments of the election process but there is a constant dependency in a single form of governance i.e. the democracy. In the United States, there are several political factions with different set of ideologies however they are not able to participate in the election process actively due to the dominance of the State government and the Congress that follows democracy in the nation. Therefore, there are some reforms that are required to be implemented in the election process in order to allow people to have more choices rather than only single form of government.…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of the major differences between the United States and the United Kingdom’s election system is that the constituents of the United Kingdom do not directly vote for their leader, who is called the prime minister. They vote for members of parliament instead and the leader of the majority party seated in parliament usually is picked to be prime minister, and this is done by the queen. (UK Parliament 2015) Another major difference between the United States and the United Kingdom’s election system is the UK’s allowance for the dissolution of parliament. This can be done in two ways, one would be through a vote of no confidence by the parliament. This would mean members of the parliament and the prime minister would cease to do their duties and a call to election would be had in the country.…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason among many is that the system does not promise victory to the presidential candidate who wins the majority of the popular vote, which is voted on by the American citizens. To many, an effective resolution would be the alignment of the electoral vote with the popular vote in some way. Many polls have indicated that“…majorities of adult Americans would dump the electoral college “system” in favor of a direct one-person-one-vote system to elect American presidents.” (Cronin) On the other hand some “believe there must be a better way to select a president than by popular vote alone.” (Bosnor and…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sources from Procon.org said, “If the election depended solely on the popular vote, then candidates could limit campaigning to heavily-populated areas or specific regions (Procon.org).” The candidates would not have to do as much campaigning because they would only be focused on the battleground states. Even though if the U.S only had the popular vote, all states would become battleground states because there would be no pledged delegates to put the final state vote in. The election process needs to be changed, there are several fixes that could be implemented into Congress to fix the electoral system in the United States. The Electoral College takes the power away from the citizens that they should have in a modern democracy, like voting directly for presidential candidates most importantly. According to Jerry Fresia, "None of our rights have been handed down; they have all been won through resistance.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By competing in elections parties offer citizens worthwhile options in governance, paths for political contribution, and options to shape their country’s future. Yet, in many countries, political parties disappoint in reacting to citizens’ problems and are thus broadly doubted by the public. When the citesens’ trust in political parties is undermined, the democratic process as whole suffers. In all sustainable democracies, the party system must be fundamental in the fabric of society. Political parties are a main key to any democracy.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Differences between the two types of governments is that democratic governments allow citizens residing in the given country to cast votes based on political parties running for the government. Dictatorship on the other hand is a government run by a small party or most of the time one single individual. Leadership is usually not appointed but taken. It is usually concluded that a democratic government is superior to dictatorship. However, it is up to the citizens to choose and vote for who they think would be a good leader who would benefit their country.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vance states in his memoir that “Political scientists have spent millions of words trying to explain how Applachia and the South went from staunchly Democratic to staunchly Republican in less than a generation” (Vance 68.) This can be easily explained with Americans’ voting habit. Again, statistic of Business Insider shows that 84% of liberal voters chose Clinton, and 81% of conservative voters chose Trump. People do not vote for candidates, they vote for parties instead, and approximately two third of the population formed this idea in their family since they were young. In consequence, only around one third of the voters actually voted: the Independent.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Illegitimacy of The Electoral College According to Merriam-Webster, the definition of democracy is “government by the people; especially: rule of the majority.” Democracy has always been a substantial element of The United States policy. The U.S. support for democracy has aided in the creation of a dependable and a flourishing world economy (“Democracy”). The United States is a democratic nation, yet we have a system known as the Electoral College which hinders democracy. It is a system that has worked well in its past, but the nation has undergone many changes both socially and politically. Throughout the nation, people are gradually becoming more upset with the Electoral College because they believe it is an unfair system that does…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wheeler talks about the dismay other countries had regarding the 2000 presidential election results, “It was difficult for many in both fledgling and established democracies to understand how citizens of the United States, the champion of democracy, could accept a decision to install a president who did not win the popular vote.” The electoral college diminishes the importance of the votes of people but it also reinforces the idea of a two-party political system by making it almost impossible for a third-party candidate to be…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays