Capital Punishment Essay: The Case Against The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
The Case Against the Death Penalty
Current Event by Tamara Killorin
The title of the article I chose for this assignment was The Case Against the Death Penalty. It was written by Hugo Adam Bedau in 1973 as a pamphlet. The version posted up on the American Civil Liberties Union website was most recently revised in 2012 with added content contributed by Bedau.
The death penalty or capital punishment has been a popular method of dealing with crime throughout mankind’s existence as far back as history can take us. However, today it can no longer be considered an acceptable method of punishment because the truth is that state sanctioned murder is not only deeply morally repugnant but it’s no longer in any sense even necessary. There are several reasons why the death penalty is an obsolete practice and they need to be known.
The death penalty is too expensive and wasteful of limited resources such as courtrooms, judges, juries, security, litigation fees, and public
…show more content…
You would think that the threat of death by the state would be a reason enough to not commit a crime, but this is not the case. Studies have shown that states that implement the death penalty have higher criminal homicide rates than those of states with no death penalty. The only way for this sort of government action to be effective in preventing crime would be for it to be consistent, which it is not and could never be because mandatory death sentencing is unconstitutional. Normally, the death penalty is given to people who have committed murder. However, not all murder cases meet the same criteria. Often when people are killed by other people, it’s not premeditated. Therefore, if we decided that all people who kill people are to be killed themselves, the world would be a disaster. Life imprisonment without any chance of parole has proven to be a severe enough punishment to discourage people from committing crimes of such violent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Indisputably, the death penalty is only warranted for limited reasons such as mass murderers, serial killers, and the killers of children and the elderly. The first type of murderer who deserves to be on death row is the killer of numerous people all at one time. It is hard to fathom that such a person would do something so terrible to innocent lives. Edward Koch, former mayor of New York, states, “when we protect guilty lives, we give up innocent lives in exchange” (487). Koch’s point could not be more true because, if we fail to put someone on death row for mass murder the we do not avenge the innocent lives that were taken.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans today tend to believe that the death penalty is inhumane and if the government kills someone they are decreasing the value of life. However, such accusations are simply not true.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death Penalty Case Study

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    I don’t agree with the death penalty because it does not act as a deterrent as people continue to murder on a regular basis, it cannot be reversed, therefore if the person was found to be innocent after a conviction they can be released but if they have already been executed an innocent person has been killed by error. The death penalty is also much more expensive then a life sentence. I believe that killing a serious criminal is not a punishment, yes there are is one less criminal in the world per say but killing them is ending their life rather than them not facing the consequences for committing a serious offence. I also believe that because the death penalty still exists in some countries it should be used for serious indictable offences rather than offences such as drug trafficking. It is illegal to drug traffic but during the act no one is getting hurt and offenders shouldn’t be…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Capital Punishment Flaws

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The bottom line is it is more expensive to keep a prisoner on death row, the death penalty is unethical and leads to the death off innocent lives, and it has shown no significant decline in criminal activity. Based on the evidence provided in this paper, the death penalty needs to be abolished once and for all. All of the evidence has proved the point that capital punishment is not beneficial to society in terms of ethics, economics, or…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The system isn 't perfect, so unfortunately, there are innocent people who are imprisoned. This runs the risk of innocent people being wrongfully executed due to the death penalty being in place. Cameron Todd Willington from Texas was wrongfully executed in 2004 even though there was strong evidence and forensics that proved his innocence. No matter what people think or say, the death penalty is not effective. It is not worth the risk of executing an innocent person, the cost, and it doesn 't make criminals not want to commit…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death Penalty Effective

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, for some people it doesn’t always mean it’s a fact. Unfortunately people commit crimes because they do not care or think about the consequence before doing so. There is no evidence that the death penalty is effective because it’s an easy way out, doesn’t bring closure, it’s unconstitutional and it 's not cheap. With or without the death penalty people will still commit murder. There are many examples proving the death penalty is not effective.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment is Dead Wrong Capital punishment, such as the death penalty, is an intolerable denial of civil liberties and is inconsistent with the fundamental values of our democratic system; the death penalty is uncivilized in theory and unfair and inequitable in practice. There should not be a death penalty in action. It isn’t as effective as other options out there, and is morally wrong. The death penalty isn’t the best form of prevention, closure and isn’t the economical smart choice. In addition to that, it stirs an immense deal of controversy.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Innocents are at risk of losing their lives for something they never did, and there has been many cases in the past where innocents have unfortunately died. Killing someone because they had killed someone is an unforgiving sentiment, and only serves to preserve the violent nature of society which may potentially lead to more people dying. The argument that the death penalty serves as a deterrent for crime is a false argument; not only does it do absolutely nothing to slow down the crime rate, it can lead to increase in the crime rate. Economic issues are found with the usage of the death penalty, that states spend an abnormal amount of money on cases with the death penalty and gaining nothing from it. The money should be more wisely invested, such as areas that are in critical need of funding.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is that last group of people that I am most concerned about at the moment. Killing, as a general rule, is immoral. Is it possible to be a virtuous person and still play a direct role in bringing about the death of another person? This is a tricky question, I admit. I honestly do not full heartedly support the death penalty, but I think there are rare cases in which it would be just and in the best interest of the safety of the general public.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system. The arguing stance for the death penalty says it deters murders, but in reality, the death penalty just leads to another loss of human life - regardless of the murder being an execution. When somebody tortures another human being, the government does not decide to torture that person in return. It’s the same for a rapist; the government does not rape the rapist. So, why does the government decide to murder the murderer?…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays