Abolish Death Penalty Research Paper

Decent Essays
An Argument of why the Death Penalty needs to be Abolish
The United States is a country governed by democracy, America the leading country in the world, many of us like to pride ourselves as the greatest, even if we know we’re far from perfect, but we certainly have many good aspects. Unfortunately, many of our cons are us as the American people are spilt on many major issues. The list is endless but there is one in particular I want to make an argument that it’s time for us to banish; I am talking about is the death penalty. From the beginning of human recorded history, humans who had committed a serious enough crime would, not always, go through a trial and should they be found guilty would lose their life as punishment. From different countries
…show more content…
Because the whole process of it tends to take a very long time, the costs of it up goes quickly. We prefer to ensure that the person sentence to death is not innocent, as Richard C. Dieter, who is the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center explains the time for evidences add up with a very committed court system can put much on taxpayer’s money. And as with most of those cases, the prosecution goes nowhere. An average wait could take up to ten years, at most twenty-five years, appeals and forensic evidences, Americans agreed to kill an innocent man is far worse than letting five criminals go free. It even cost more than life in prison, surprisingly enough, without the possibly of parole I might add. Professor Brad Bushamn of communication and psychology, explains by giving an example like California, the death sentence cost $250 million per execution along with the federal cost which is an additional $12 million. Death penalty supporters will dismiss this as they argue that purposely declining it as best they can be the reason taxpayers keeps spending so much. Yes, they agree, we do spend too much on the death penalty, so we need to adjust it to where we be spending less, shorting the waiting period would be the first step. Besides, the risk of convicting an innocent man is rare as we now have the advance forensic …show more content…
Of the 38 states that continue the death penalty, 20 of those does juvenile executions, 15 of those have the minimum age of 16 while the rest is age 17. Since 1976 18 minors had been executed, Texas is responsible for 13 of juvenile executions. Many argue this should be considered cruel and unusual punishment, minors are not allowed to drink or sign up for the military, yet are old enough to be sentence to death, they are not fully mature as their brains are still being developed. About 60% of the juveniles sentenced to death had a background of abuse and neglect. But supporters of the juvenile death penalty argue just because minors are not yet adults, shouldn’t be an excuse when have a conscious understanding of right and wrong, by keeping it, young adults would know there is a serious consequence when committing a horrible crime, making an example of just one of them would set the others straight from doing criminal actives. Punishment should not be decided by age, but the severity of the crime, and for that, it is

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    On top of that, it costs more for Capital Punishment then it does for life in prison. It is a long complex process that takes a very long time and a lot of money. This is to reduce the chance of an innocent man or women being convicted, but this doesn’t eliminate that possibility 100%. A numerous amount of people could question and say the opposite and think life in prison is cheaper, but if you add up all the trials going into it, the Death Penalty is far more expensive and more of a hassle. Sometimes there are cases where the Death Penalty could be up to 3 million more than a non death penalty case.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The extra money spent on the death penalty could be spent on other means of achieving justice and making the community safer. “To any state, a million dollars spent today is a lot more costly than an equivalent amount paid gradually over 40 years” (www.nmrepeal.org/issues/cost). Some may argue that paying this large fee is worth it for deterring crime, but that is flaw. “The death penalty is not a deterrent to crime. In 2006, the South again had the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They would also say that there are interest groups based on victim’s families who didn’t want their aggressor to be executed. The second, which is the largest misconception, is that it is in fact cheaper to put someone in jail for life then to execute them. For example California could save over 1 billion dollars over a five-year period if it eliminated the death penalty. In an article released by USA Today they said, ‘"It 's 10 times more expensive to kill them than to keep them alive," though most Americans believe the opposite, said Donald McCartin, a former California jurist known as "The Hanging Judge of Orange County" for sending nine men to death row.”’ In California he average process takes over twenty years before and execution is carried out. That us twenty years of paying for the housing and feeding of these criminals and paying for the legal system to process all the appeals.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (‘Death Penalty Information Center’). Putting the right murder in a high level security prison is more likely to keep citizens safe and save taxpayers money; which may defer poverty in the U.S. The cost alone should give more than enough reason for the government to abolish the death penalty, the funds should be put towards crime prevention; not criminal inspiration. With trial fees, attorney fees, and high top level of security needed, each death row inmate cost about $ 1Million dollars per case. (“Death Penalty Information Center’).…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thesis: For many significant reasons—especially economic concerns toward the considerable amount of money spent conducting and funding a possibly fatal case—every state should enforce life without parole instead of the death penalty. Chammah, Maurice. "Six Reasons the Death Penalty Is Becoming More Expensive." The Marshall Project. N.p., 17 Dec. 2014.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They will bring up the fact that it cost twice as much a year to kill a person then it does to keep them on life without parole, but most of that cost is for security because the people people being housed on death row are murderers so it going to take more man power to make sure they don’t try anything. The second part of their argument involves a sum total of the cost of killing someone usually over a million dollars which looks like big scary number compared to $47,421 a year, but that because they include the cost of the original trail, appeals, lawyer costs, and other court cost, all added on top of the original cost of keeping them in jail. When people talk about the cost of keeping them in jail forever they never include that those people are doing the exact same thing. Also even though it cost a million dollars to kill someone it cost a lot more to put them in jail for life in California it cost $47,421 a year per person over then course of 50 years that comes to 2,371,050 a person on top of their legal fees. The death penalty does costs a lot and that’s a problem, but abolishing the death penalty isn’t the answer to the cost because then we’re just paying more over a longer period, the answer is showing people that it’s more expensive to keep them…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Indeed, the longer trial preparation, longer jury decisions, and many more appeals have increased the price of a death sentence exponentially past the relatively inexpensive price of LWOP (“Does the Death Penalty Cost”). The death penalty is a bureaucratic nightmare, specifically designed to ensure that only guilty people are killed; this explodes the amount of money needed to put a guilty man to death to astronomical heights. Capital punishment is therefore much more expensive than life without parole and is simply too expensive to be financially worthwhile and…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even the nation 's police chiefs frown upon capital punishment, "ranking the death penalty last in their priorities for effective crime reduction and rating it as one of the most inefficient uses of taxpayer dollars in fighting crime" (Dieter, "Testimony on the Cost and Inefficiency of Capital Punishment"). To abolish the death penalty the United States would undoubtedly save millions of dollars per year, money which could be put to more efficient use to improve the overall economic health of the country. With the newfound money saved people would be provided with better access to health care which would lead to a substantial decrease in the poverty of the United States, in turn reducing the murder rate much more efficiently when in comparison with executions. Executions are no longer prevalent in modern society and as society has advanced to become more civilized, so has the methods of dealing with…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Believe it or not, “per person, the death penalty is probably one of the most expensive state programs, and it produces no measurable gain in public safety. While states were spending millions of dollars on a single capital case, the average police budget had to be cut by 7 percent this year” ( qtd. in Jost 980). The United States is having economic problems at the moment, and would it not be smarter to save that amount of money? So much money is spent on these cases in the name of justice, even though they would get punishment enough by being imprisoned for life.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished because it would be much more cost effective, it is immoral, and has the potential to put innocent lives at risk. The death penalty is much more costly than being sentenced to life without parole. Millions of dollars are wasted on winning verdicts, which require expensive second trials, new witnesses and long…

    • 1080 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays