Abolitionist Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
The death penalty is a very controversial subject in today’s culture and being a criminal justice major; this topic has a lot of interest to me. If I had to classify myself in a group that dealt with capital punishment, I would consider myself a retentionist. I am all for punishing the guilty and giving murders the punishment they deserve. Not only in my eyes, but the eyes of all retentionists, we believe that the main reason we should punish the offender is because they morally deserve it. I truly believe that the death penalty is morally permissible.
I believe that the two biggest arguments that abolitionists have going for them is the idea that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment and that we should respect their human dignity more. I can see where they could have an argument there but at the same time that is their belief. We all have a different stance on this subject, it’s just what you think is the better outcome in the end.
Abolitionists believe that the death penalty is considered cruel and unusual punishment due to all of the things that have happened in previous executions. They believe that innocent people who are wrongly convicted are executed, executions
…show more content…
Richard Dieter explains, “The death penalty is much more expensive than it’s closest alternative – life imprisonment with no parole. Capital trials are longer and more expensive at every step than other murder trials. Pre-trial motions, expert eye witness investigations, jury selection, and the necessity for two trials – one on guilt and one on sentencing – make capital cases extremely costly, even before the appeals process begins. Guilty pleas are almost unheard of when the punishment is death. In addition, many of these trials result in life sentences rather than the death penalty, so the state pays the cost of life imprisonment on top of the expensive trial.” (Dieter,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In 1972 the Supreme Court issued a moratorium on the death penalty. Three years later in 1975 William F. Buckley writes an article that was published in Execution Eve and Other Contemporary Ballads discussing and counter arguing abolitionists about the death penalty and its effects. Buckley writes the article to try and convince people the moratorium must be lifted. Buckley believes it’s better to sacrifice the life of the convicted criminal rather than risk the lives of an unknown amount of innocent…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is a punishment of thousands of years of history. At present, there are still many countries and regions that use the death penalty as the capital punishment, but there are also many countries and regions have abolished the death penalty. The argument of whether to abolish the death penalty has also appeared for a long time. This article will discuss why we should not abolish the death penalty from the perspectives of humanism, miscarriage, discrimination and deterrence. When it…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    misinterpreted? Debate surrounding this sacrificial fetish has been timeless in all cultures. Many great minds have contemplated the intellectual struggle of the death penalty as a state regulated punishment. It has now become a generational struggle in which citizens must ask themselves difficult and profound…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays