Juvenile Being Tried As Adults Essay

Decent Essays
There have been many opinions on juveniles being convicted as adults on the crimes they have committed. When it comes to some of these harsh crimes, who could not punish the individual to the fullest? It does not matter how old a person is because everyone knows the difference between right and wrong. If someone is raised differently and believes it is okay to murder another human, than they cannot just change their mindset. An individual that makes and adult decision should have the same consequences. Some people will argue that age matters because people mature and change. Individuals that would make the decision to kill someone else should be responsible no matter what their age may be. No matter if the juvenile was not in the best home …show more content…
These are behaviors that cannot be untaught. A lot of the time, when criminals get out of prison or jail they end up back in the prison or jail. There has to be psychological problems and that is something no one just grows out of. Self-control is something an individual has to teach themselves even if they were not taught by a parent or guardian. If a juvenile assumes they can take someone’s life and makes the decision to do something they know is wrong then there is no reason to take it easy on them when being given their time to serve. There are always individuals whom do not believe that juveniles should be tried as adults. In an experiment with mock jurors, “younger defendants were perceived as less accountable and less competent” (Semple and Woody 302). Also in the experiment of Semple and Woody, the defendant’s age did not affect conviction judgements; younger defendants’ were given a shorter sentence than the older defendants’ (302). Even though they see that the person committed the crime they do not want to give the same long term consequences’. Also in Semple and Woody’s study, the severity of the crime was also taking into account for the juvenile offenders (302). “When it came to defendant’s younger than eighteen years old, the mock …show more content…
They have the same choice in making the decision to commit the crime so why would they not get the same amount of time as an adult? If they make adult decisions then they should get the adult consequences. There will always be someone bias in the jury but as they do get convicted of the crime, juveniles still get less time than adults. When the crime is murder, however, juveniles do get sentenced to life without parole depending on the extent. “Difference in responsibility measures indicated that those in the twenty five year old group were significantly more inclined to take responsibility for their own actions and view behaviors in long term” (Bryan-Hancock and Casey 66). This indicates that anyone under twenty five does not take responsibility for their actions. When it comes to being guilty or not guilty not everyone does take responsibility but they still get their punishment. No matter the age of a individual they should be tried as an adult and have to take responsibility for their own actions whether they want to or not. A juvenile could be given a short sentence and/or just probation and have the idea in their head that they can get away with a crime. The next crime they commit can be far worse and result in harming another individual in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Juveniles and adults are both humans, both commit mistakes along the way, and are able to make amends too. Juveniles should be tried as adults if they commit a crime with a silly reason. If a person is aware of what they are doing and has control of what they are doing then they should be punished. A 16 year old shouldn’t be insane enough to commit a crime. But, if the teen…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When they do, juveniles should receive the same sentence for committing the same crime. Juveniles know the basics of right and wrong, and therefore know that violent crimes like murder are wrong. Teenage criminals should be subject to adult sentences for the adult crimes they commit (Reynolds). Because some youth think they cannot be charged as adults, they commit violent crimes without thinking first (Estudillo). Teens that commit crimes have not felt tough enough consequences, which is why they continue to have out of control behavior.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A hateful crime committed by juveniles should always be punished with a sentence to life in prison. Being a juvenile should not exempt you from receiving a punishment. Even though teens might commit a crime due to an abusive family environment, they must be punished in order to learn that wrong actions will have consequences. It is safe to say that teenagers are capable of committing crimes that any adult would commit. Many argue that a teen’s brain is not fully developed but how come they are able to plan the crime that they want to commit.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Juveniles that are very close to the age of being an adult are more than likely to attend court, but rarely never. This results in behavioral changes that make the juveniles act more formal when the court actually takes over. The crime rates for the age of eighteen and nineteen are significantly lower than the rates of a sixteen or seventeen year old just because of how much the punishment increases when you turn eighteen. Everyone in the United States would want a low crime rate in their particular area. If everyone has the same punishment no matter who you are, there is a chance of the crime rate lowering a great deal.…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Steinberg mentions in her paper that based on the severity of their crime or if they have a history of repeating the same crime over and over can cause harm, is not safe and can be a threat to for the other juveniles. “ The severity of their offense merits a relatively more severe punishment, or because their history of repeated offending bodes poorly for their ultimate rehabilitation” ( Steinberg 1). Based on the severity of their crime or the history that the juveniles have of repeating the same crime over and over should be tried as adults because they can learn a lesson and when they get out they will not do it again. Another point that she states,“ starts to become the rule rather than the…

    • 2457 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Do you think it is prudent to imprison a troubled juvenile with dangerous criminals which have committed actual horrific crimes? I don’t think it is, but some people from the Justice Department and others believe it would be beneficial for troubled juveniles. Even though they committed a crime and should get punished accordingly, despite their age, juveniles should not be transferred to adult facilities. Because prior to the crime executed or imprisonment, the individual was influenced negatively by factors while growing up and developing, that shaped the individual that way. Also after being imprisoned in an adult facility, the juvenile is more susceptible to execute a crime not only quicker but also to a higher degree.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The decision to end a life must be absolutely and without question warranted. If society acknowledges and takes mercy on mentally impaired offenders, the same courtesy should be extended to adolescents who experience the same type of diminished capacity. In order for a juvenile to be sentenced to death, they must first be tried as an adult, but they are not an adult. Adolescents don’t have the same brain maturity, emotional maturity or life experience as adults do. The juveniles who commit the crimes that could land them on death row are missing something in their lives.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    History of this case has proven to us that juveniles can be just as dangerous as adults. The court system should be able to give life sentences to juveniles who commit crimes that would have given them life in prison if they were adults. There are, however, some reasons as to why juveniles shouldn’t have to receive a life sentence for crimes they committed. If the young person is under sixteen years old, they should be tested for mental stability. There are some circumstances in which the young person has done a certain crime to protect him or herself, or others; there may be a time when life sentencing should not be taken upon him or her, or any sentencing of punishment thereof.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They have that mindset that if they do something they won’t face serious charges due to their age. There is 1st degree 2nd degree third degree and involuntary manslaughter. I am a pro because I believe that if an adult kills someone same way a juvenile did I believe they both deserve the same punishment. Why is it that a man gets 25 to life after a crime and a 15 year old commits same exact crime and he gets jail time until he’s 21 doesn’t make any sense. They should both deserve the same punishment because no matter what or how that kid…

    • 2197 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Death Penalty Papers

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For some people might not agree the idea about abolish the death penalty for juveniles. At time, people who want to see capital punishment happened with everyone with no exception. They argue that it does not matter the killers are children or not, if they committed the crime that mean they are old enough to pay their action. They are acting like an adults,…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics