What Is The Death Penalty Inhumane

Improved Essays
In discussions of capital punishment, one controversial issue has been whether or not the death penalty benefits the states that enforce capital punishment. On the one hand, those who oppose the death penalty argues that capital punishment is inhumane and should not be used to end someone’s life. On the other hand, those in favor of capital punishment firmly believe that the death penalty is the only way to make the world just. My own view is: the death penalty gives life value and justice; it helps reduce prison crowding, and ensures public safety. Americans today tend to believe that the death penalty is inhumane and if the government kills someone they are decreasing the value of life. However, such accusations are simply not true. …show more content…
Many people who are opposed to capital punishment assume that this is not a big issue, but those people would be wrong. According to, Time magazine article writer, Adam Cohen, more and more prisons are becoming over crowded and are leading to more riots, more inmate on inmate physical contact, and more sexual abuse (Time article Cohen). Because of the lack of privacy and the lack of space the inmates are irritated and the guards are having a harder time keeping everything in order. The government has yet to come up with a solution for dealing with such high rates of over population, but I believe we already have a solution. If we enforced the death penalty there wouldn’t be as many prisoners in prison; they would be executed. Here many people who despise the death penalty would probably object that capital punishment is not the moral solution to such a problem. Regardless, we need a solution and we need it fast. The death penalty can help the prisons from becoming too full. Just letting prisoners out isn’t helping the cause because most prisoners go back to prison with in three years or so anyways. According to Crime In America, an online newspaper, “Fifty-two percent of the offenders were returned to prison for “serious” crimes and technical violations (they didn’t follow the rules of their release after prison)” (CrimeinAmerica.Net). That means over half the inmates that get out of prison go back …show more content…
But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again. We need to consider our safety and stop these killers from committing more murders. Many people who are against the death penalty, of course, may want to question whether there is an alternative way to protect society without the use of capital punishment. Such as, putting the criminals in prison for life. Though I concede that putting away the felons can help, I still insist that murderers get the death penalty because it is the only way to 100% guarantee that they will never kill again. The New York Times writer, Stanley Marcus, makes a great point by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In “Death of the Death Penalty”, David Von Drehle states that the death penalty is becoming less common and should now just be abolished because of the cost and time that it takes. Drehles article was published in Time Magazine. He concludes that the death penalty has become unnecessary and doesn’t work anymore. The crime rate in the United States has declined so much that in the past decade even though there are hundreds of people under the death penalty. This statement is making people believe that there is no reason to keep the death penalty in our society.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral on Capital Punishment Working at a prison is a dangerous job; you are surrounded by evil minded crooks and murderers every day. Even though security is said to be on top and the rules are set, these people, these immoral souls have no limits and a rule or a law for them is seen as a challenge to break. Donna Payant, a 31-year-old correction officer had to learn this the hard way. The year was 1981 and she had just arrived for what was supposed to be a regular day at work, however, it turned out to be her last. Donna Payant, the mother of three children and with a loving husband, was murdered at work by inmate Lemuel Smith, a rapist and two-time convicted murderer.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “After all, crime is only a left-handed form of human endeavor,” John Huston (Silver and Ursini 237). Crime has become a part of human life. To prevent it, human has created the punishment system to scare others from sin, and the ultimate payment for a crime is death sentence. Death penalty was and still thought to be the most effective and definitive way of examples for crimes’ consequences. Since 1976, the death penalty was re-instituted in the U.S:…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital punishment is defined as the legal authorization of killing someone as a form of punishment for committing a crime. In the United States, the death penalty is almost always exclusively used for the crime of murder. In 1972, in Furman v. Georgia, ' the United States Supreme Court invalidated every death penalty statute in the United States. Currently, there are 31 states who still use the death penalty and 19 who have abolished it. On August 2, 2016, Delaware become the latest of states to overturn their death penalty policy.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since August, 6, 1912, there have been two hundred and eighty two executions, done by the state of South Carolina (South Carolina Department of Corrections, 2016.) Death row is not only morally wrong, but it is telling the murders, and other people up for death row, that killing someone for doing something wrong is right. Death row should be abolished, not only does it give inmates the impression that an eye for an eye is okay, but it puts innocence people lives at risk, it costs taxpayers millions of dollars, and it is a violation of the eight amendments. First of all, the death penalty puts innocent lives at risk. One hundred and thirty eight men and women have been acquitted from death row, and some of these individuals were days or even…

    • 1124 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I have presented both an argument in favor of the death penalty and against the death penalty. To start with there is a brief history of capital punishment including some important legal cases. Many arguments can be made as to the morality of execution, below I describe the deterrent effects as well as a common view held by Immanuel Kant in support of capital punishment. Both of these views are shared by many people. In opposition to capital punishment I have considered the fundamental view that killing, even a murderer, is wrong and the morality of charging juries with understanding the laws that govern sentencing.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When yopu keep the criminals alive if there prison sentence is short they can get out of prison and go kill another person if we had death penalty in those states without it this would never happen. As the criminals are getting away and staying alive and killing more people. having the death penalty will be safer for not just citizens but the other prisoners in the prison also, there has been killings inside prisons all the time with these crazy mad people if we had death penalty this would also never happen. "An overwhelming majority of Americans support a death penalty for those--and only those--who deserve to die.” Most people think that the capital punishment is not necessary because it is cruel and unnecessary but once they saw the outcome and saw how much the death penalty can make us safer and not be scared to go to unsafe and dangerous…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Safety is one of the bases for society to function and thrive in an orderly manner. It provides individuals with a sense of peace and justice. Capital punishment doesn’t only make it safer for the guards but the inmates too. You always hear stories of inmates being stabbed and shanked. If a criminal has the urge to always kill, like these mass murders do then how are they going to control it in prison?…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My opinion is people are scared of death, making the death penalty a great deterrence for murder. Life if jail just provides murderers with a place with shelter, food, and sometimes socialization, but is just a more confined way of living. Someone who lives on the street or in the cold for example may find this…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe that a future criminal would much rather die than spend his life or a greater portion of it in prison. Therefore, a future criminal would be less likely to commit a grand crime if the death penalty was abolished across the United States. The overpopulation in our prisons does not tie in to what we decide to do with the death penalty. I would argue that abolishing the death penalty means financial costs to taxpayers are kept lower because the cost of capital punishment is several times that of keeping someone in prison for life. Also, the death penalty is barbaric and violates the Eight Amendment.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty gives the power to deprive the life from people and should not be enforced in our legal system. This sentence on humans that are convicted of a crime goes against the constitution that this country holds as the ultimate law of the land. As stated by William J. Brennan, JD, “Death is today a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Clause... I would set aside the death sentences imposed... as violative of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments." (1976).…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To forcefully end someone’s life is the most heinous thing a person can do. That is, according to many, unless they deserve it. Murder is wrong, and those who commit murder are bad. So through some logic, the government sees fit that murdering murderer’s is ok.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics