Edward I. Koch's Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Great Essays
The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation.. The death penalty fulfills a role within the United States Judicial system that, …show more content…
Arguments against the death penalty can be simplified and classified into the categories of the brutality of the process, along with its morality, and the basic reason of why it is apart of the United States Judicial system.
The argument in support of the death penalty has been prevalent throughout the decades and although the times have changed the reasons of why it is obligatory to the safety of this nation's citizens. When presented with the question concerning the necessity of the death penalty, an essay by Edward I. Koch titled "Death and Justice" comes to mind in support of capital punishment. Koch starts with two short examples of murderers who were on death row and executed in 1984. The first example is of a man named Robert Lee Willie, who had been convicted of raping and murdering an 18 year old woman. Minutes before his death in the Louisiana state prison Mr. Willie made the statement that "killing people is wrong... It makes no difference whether it's citizens, countries, or governments. Killing is wrong." Mr.Koch's next example is of Joseph Carl Shaw, a murderer, rapist, and kidnapper who was put on death row in South Carolina. Koch

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “The Death Penalty: Is it Ever Justified”, the longtime democratic and former mayor of New York Edward Koch refutes the idea that death penalty should be removed due to the possibility of an innocent suspect. To counter, Koch explains that states, “Human life deserves special protection, and one of the best ways to guarantee protection is to assure that convicted murderers do not kill again”. He goes on by adding that administering the death penalty is the only guaranteed solution. While killing these people does assure they will not commit murder again, the idea that an innocent citizen could be wrongly accused and receive the death penalty is an abhorrent thought. Once a citizen is executed, if more information is discovered…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Edward I. Koch provides multiple pinpoints on the view of the death penalty. Koch states clear evidence that supports each point he brings up. I use to be supportive of the death penalty until reading this passage. The reading is an eye-opener, showing that taking another life to vindicate murder is not justifiable. He brings up one of the Ten Commandments from the bible, “Thou Shalt Not Commit Murder,” which is one of America’s greatest source of inspiration.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On April 15th, 1985 “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” was published in the New Republic. In this article, the author Edward Koch, an outspoken lawyer and former mayor of New York City, uses seven main arguments of why he believes capital punishment is not only necessary but also a way to show how precious human life is (483). In this essay, I will not argue whether or not I agree with his view on the death penalty, but rather if Koch makes a sound and logical argument in favor of capital punishment. Although Koch is a well-educated man with a lot of experience with the issue at hand, his arguments seem to lack empirical evidence as well as plaguing them with fallacies. Koch starts out by painting a picture in your mind,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edward I Koch is a death penalty supporter, the politician wants death penalty to be the capital punishment. The argument “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” by Edward I Koch describes Koch’s point of view on death penalty and attempts to persuade why death penalty is justified. Koch identifies seven…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty today is perceived by many as an inhumane way of receiving punishment. A critic will not only argue the simple fact that the death penalty is a violation of one’s constitutional rights and only targeted for a particular social group, but also intended to affect innocent people. The death penalty doesn’t have to be the way it’s perceived to be today, for if it is dealt with accordingly, the benefits will outweigh the negative and would help the United States in the foreseeing future. That being said, instead of worrying about the damage the death penalty may cause, one should take into consideration the reasoning behind maintaining and implementing new procedures that would further enforce the penalty nationwide. Convicts…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Koch says this as his thesis statement, “Because I support the death penalty for heinous crimes of murder, I have sometimes been the subject of emotional and outraged attacks by voters who find my position reprehensible or worse. I have listened to their ideas. I have weighed their objections carefully. I still support the death penalty. The reasons I maintained my position can be best understood by examining the arguments most frequently heard in opposition” (Koch, para.4).…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of the death penalty has been a long discussed debate in the criminal justice system. First going into this discussion one must discuss the definition of the death penalty and its history. The death penalty for crimes has been a tool used throughout history. The first ever recorded execution of a criminal in America occurred in the year 1612 when a Spanish spy was caught. Each colony had its own laws for the states justification of taking a life.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On April 15, 1985 an essay written by Edward I. Koch was published in a magazine called the New Republic. Mr. Koch title his essay “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life”. In the essay the author explains why he continues to support the death penalty even after hearing and analyzing the opinions and adverse points of views against capital punishment. Mr. Koch begins by stating that even if others believe that the death penalty is cruel, it is actually done more humane and without any pain and suffering. At the same time, the essay describes the death penalty as a fair punishment for murders committed.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As he states; “Some critics of capital punishment, such as columnist Jimmy Breslin, have suggested that a life sentence is actually a harsher penalty for murder than death.’ This is sophistic nonsense” (Koch 486). Koch disagrees with Jimmy Breslin, because he is not convinced that a life sentence in prison is harsher than an execution. While Koch sees a person convicted for murder being executed, Bruck’s idea is to make sure that the convicted murderer has proof of either being guilty or innocent. Bruck believes that it is important to know because there have been cases where innocent people have been executed before.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Costanzo reports his liberal views about the death penalty to the general public. Not only does the author address the costs and consequences, but also his opinion as to why the death penalty is not the best way to seek justice throughout the book. The author, however, provides useful information with regards to the length from the moment defendants are sentenced to the minute they are executed. The book, in general, is intended for those who are curious about those who are against the death penalty and later use the information obtained to provide a debatable argument. Costanzo uses history to back up his claims with regards to how cruel the death penalty has been in the past.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The implications of this take away much of Koch’s reliability as a writer and the credibility of his case for capital…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since it was introduced, the death penalty has caused much division among the people of the United States. There happen to be a large amount of people in favor of the death penalty, but at the same time there are a large amount that are against it. As of today, there remain 33 states that have held on to the death penalty and 17 that have gotten rid of it. In my opinion, I have always believed that the death penalty should be a legal form of punishment throughout the entire country. A few of the reasons I believe this should be are proper retribution, a good form of crime deterrence, and more.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He uses the argument to strengthen his own claim, by saying that instead of it being a valid reason for ending the death penalty, if seen from a different perspective, it is even more justification for extending it. He expresses that “The appeals process for a condemned prisoner is lengthy and painstaking. Every effort is made to see that the verdict and sentence were fairly arrived at” (323). This goes to show that the discrimination factor of the death penalty is no longer the main problem, as the state maintains standards as to how the decision is made and why. Koch explains the unrighteousness of those who may be accused not being held accountable simply because of a few who are speculated to be “favored”, as justice also falls under equality, no matter the circumstance.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justify Death Penalty

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    THE DEATH PENALTY 3 The Death Penalty and Its Justification under the Constitution One of the biggest topics up for political discussion today is the death penalty.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays