David Nosal 's Business Strategy Essay
1058 Words Nov 29th, 2015 null Page
ISSUE: The 9th Circuit Court would need to determine what the original intent of 18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(4), which was the primary law being brought forth by the federal government to prosecute Nosal, by the aiding of Korn/Ferry employees to use their authorized access to obtain information with the intent to defraud.”(United States v. Nosal, 642 F.3d 781 (9th Cir. 2011). Additionally, the courts would need to decipher the interrupted meaning of “exceeds authorized access” as it would apply to a privately owned business and not to a government entity. This would include computer privileges granted to employees by their employer and the misuse thereafter.
RULE: The court ruled in favor of Nosal,…