Case Study: Anderson V. Ken Anderson

Improved Essays
The Evidences- where the case went wrong:
According to the file there was just one evidence against Morton and that evidence was a note found at the crime scene. That note was signed with “I L Y,” for I love you, and “M,” for Michael, who was Christine’s husband. (Bazelon, 2012). That note was all about a husband’s anger over his wife as she did not let him have sex with her at the night of Morton’s birthday. But that of course was not an enough evidence to prove someone guilty of homicide. It was possible that Morton left note for Christine so that she could read it after he had left for work. But the Sherriff started treating him like he was the real culprit.
There were few shocking evidences as well that Ken Anderson kept confidential and did not present in front of the jury.
1. The biggest and most authentic evidence in favor of Michael Morton was the statement of his own son Eric. In a police report it was mentioned that the mother of Christine had told the investigators that the three year old Eric eye witnessed the murder. Eric described the scene in words like a huge monster with a big moustache killed his mother.
In the report, Eric says “He hit mommy”.
…show more content…
The question arises that why he did this. He was not a personal acquaintance of Morton still he tried his best to prove him guilty. Berry Scheck, the lawyer of the innocence project said that “some people break rules just because they wanna win”. (CBS NEWS, 2014). The rule breaking is not easy for a common citizen because of the fear of law but there are departments that work with some kind of immunity for the legal work. Prosecutors also have the immunity from being investigated. That is why he was sure that nothing could harm his career. He had not to worry because of the ruling of the Supreme Court that allow prosecutors the absolute immunity from civil law suits. This was the base of his decisions against law because he knew law won’t question

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Also many pet conspiracies were against the police as they tried to catch Jack the Ripper. These reasons suggest that the lack of evidence was not the police’s fault for the failure, but after the last murder police stopped searching for the Ripper only two months from the last homicide. This gap of two months is shorter than the gap between the murders, hinting the police might of know something that the public didn’t. In the year 1888 the police force had limited forensic equipment. DNA testing was far beyond their time, even fingerprints weren't recognized as a tool for investigating.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bad Evidence Case Study

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Serial: Final Essay Adnan Syed is not guilty due to the lack of evidence provided to prove that Syed is linked to the murder of eighteen-year-old Hae Min Lee. The evidence provided to prove Syed’s guilty goes as follows, Syed does not remember clearly where he was at the time of the murder. Jay Wilds, a casual acquaintance of Adnan Syed, reported Syed to the authorities after he helped bury Hae Min Lee and ended up not being punished for being an accomplice. Syed’s alleged motive for the murder is not clear. This is called “bad evidence”.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather, because they felt as though systems in their life were failing. For Bagshaw’s case, he was manipulated into killing Rengel by Todorovic in order to have sexual intercourse, this would have meant without a murder he would lose Todorovic. As Dr. Lisa Ramshaw claimed, the absence of Todorovic meant the murder or Rengel would likely not have occurred (Small, 2009). Many of the articles written about the Rengel murder had nothing to do with Todorovic and Bagshaw’s past. One article written about Bagshaw describing his rough past was lacking in sources.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Investigators the dismissed him from being a suspect although they did have their suspicions about the bottle. Now thinking if Mr. S. didn’t kill Hae, and neither did Adnan, who did? The answer is no one knows, but a lot of evidence points to Jay as being the suspect. He knew a lot of details about what happened and even knew where Hae’s car was located when Adnan and Jay supposedly hid it. Adnan looks more innocent when having a mindset that Jay was the murderer and blaming his buddy so that he could get away with…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Josh worked at Southwest Video with Jay. According to Josh, they were not close enough as friends and it confused him why Jay would tell him about his involvement in Hae’s murder. Josh remembers how paranoid Jay was because he thought Adnan had sent people after him for talking to the cops about the case. According to Josh, Jay tells him a similar story to Chris’ about Hae’s place of murder in which he’s certain Hae wasn’t murdered in Best Buy, he’s also certain the words ‘Best Buy’ never come up in the conversation. Another similarity in both stories is the crime took place late afternoon, rather than after school like the state’s timeline says.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burke Ramsey’s behavioral issues had a big role in the murder (CNN, 2013). Burke was almost special needs and did not get help. Also, Burke not doing it is an understatement. He was not tried for the murder of his little sister Jon Benet Ramsey (bio.com,2009). His parents were not letting the police investigate.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors and the state had a very low expectation of Adnan and Jay. They believed to each word of Jay. Jay’s testimony is full of inconsistencies in which he stated that he helped Adnan to bury Hae, even though they were not very close friends, they just knew each other. It is very obvious that Adnan had no reason to turn to Jay for help and Jay had no reason to agree with that. In taped police interviews, Jay has told detectives that he saw Hae's body at the Best Buy.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sarah Koenig's is the creator of serial and an investigator. The reason Sarah Koenig is part of this case is because she found out that this case could not be solved by other investigators. After investigating, it is clear that Adnan is innocent because someone is telling a lie, he was dating multiple people and wasn't that angry enough to kill her, and he wasn't showing signs of sadness and obsessed. To begin with, Jay kept on changing the story that Adnan killed Hae it makes it seem like he's lying or hiding something. Sarah Koenig tells the audience that the police had a difficult time figuring out Jay’s story.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People cannot be charged because of hate and vengeance, but to ensure justice for the crimes they have committed. Every citizen wants what is fair towards the people who have been harmed and for those who have done the harming. In the United States, it is an important belief that every citizen has the ability to have a lawyer with them through the trials no matter your social class, “While authorities are not required to relieve the accused of his poverty, they have the obligation not to take advantage of indigence in the administration of justice” (Paddock). Occasionally, as seen in the Miranda vs. Arizona case the line between was is acceptable…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The article refers to Dear as the accused suspect so it can be assumed that this article was released before he was convicted of the crime. The author of the article says that the shooter “had a troubled history with ex-wife…” Once again this is an exact use of the words Grenoble mentioned. This however is different from the previously mentioned use of thug when describing Trayvon Martin. It is different because in this situation these words have no relation to the incident it means nothing whether or not he was a loner with a troubled past or a happy go lucky little league baseball coach with a 4 children. He is a terrorist and the media does not label him as such.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays