Post 9/11 Privacy Rights: The Case Against Electronic Surveillance In response to concerns about terrorism after the attacks on September 11,2001, the government of the United States enacted new guidelines for conducting surveillance on the public. This paper will discuss the implementation of electronic surveillance as a tool to combat terrorism and will make the case against sweeping electronic surveillance of American citizens and others in this country. Various examples of increased surveillance along with decreasing privacy right will help the reader to conclude that these tactics have not reduced incidents of any type of crime, including terrorism. This paper will also discuss several types of electronic surveillance, including the collection of metadata from telephone records, which intruded on the private lives of citizens and did not increase their safety in any meaningful way.…
Is the Fourth Amendment violated by police action of remotely accessing a GPS or a vehicle’s tracking capabilities without a warrant or the probable cause necessary for the acquiring thereof, therefore necessitating Senator Snowy’s support of Taylor Thomas’s bill; and what would be the implications on the future of Fourth Amendment law if Senator Snowy declined to support the bill and thusly permitted the dubious practices to persist indefinitely? SHORT ANSWER Notwithstanding the current sentiments and Fourth Amendment law which allow the police to remotely accesses the GPS tracking capabilities of vehicles of presumably innocent citizens, Senator Thomas’s bill should be supported by Senator Snowy because the current tactics utilized by the…
Every day there is another media piece decrying the evils of the NRA or assuring the masses that the second amendment should not apply to AR15s because they are the cause of school shootings etc. Yet, each and every story is simply the opinion of someone who is hopelessly uneducated and brainwashed by the emotional rhetoric of the elitist left. Unfortunately, most of the cited facts are either complete fiction or half truths taken out of context and reformed to fit the desired narrative. Let’s set a few things straight, for starters, the second Amendment guarantees a right to the people, as does the first and fourth Amendments. This fact was reaffirmed by the D.C. vs Heller Supreme Court decision of 2008, more information can be found here.…
Although the Fourth Amendment protects people’s privacy, stops citizens from being ambushed, and keeps them safe from unfair arrests there is still a down side to the Fourth Amendment. For instance it prolongs the gathering of information involving a crime. Sometimes it makes the case go on for years and the felon is never convicted even though they broke the law, but they never had time to get enough evidence to convict them so they get away. Some people might say that they believe all Americans should be considered suspects and that therefore the government has probable cause for surveillance. (Avalon pg.1 pr.16)…
One of the most commonly known amendments are those that are considered part of the Bill of Rights. However, one of the most important amendment that every citizen should know is the Fourth Amendment. This Amendment is broken in three parts that imply that people should have the right to be secure in and of their property, no warrants should be issued without any unreasonable cause and that if there is a warrant, then they should specify the place and people of search. Many citizens do not completely understand this amendment to the extent to exercise this right.…
14th Amendment: A historical amendment passed by Congress in 1866. This amendment made it so all native-born or naturalized person an American citizen as well as restricting states of stripping citizens of “life, liberty, or property without due process of law”, and denying citizens “equal protection of the laws.” This amendment was created to specifically target black citizens giving them equality before the law. (Roark, Johnson, Cohen, Stage, & Hartmann, 2014, Pg. 466 )…
1) The 14th Amendment was significant to American Civil rights because of due process of law. Due process guarantees every person born or naturalized in the United States the same rights, regardless of race. It also notes that the every state must not abridge the “privileges and immunities" of citizens. Another section of the amendment states that no person can be denied “equal protection of the laws”.…
1. 14th Amendment The 14th Amendment was passed in 1866, it grants citizenship to every person born in the United States or naturalize citizens which include former slaves. The Amendment also granted every person in the county equal rights and the same benefits of all laws in the constitution.…
The 14th Amendment in the United States constitution allows jurisdiction to citizens born in the United States of America. We have to keep in mind the constitution guarantees and protect our civil liberties, our freedom. Removing natural born citizens to immigrants is not right or constitutional, also will not help America's illegal immigration. The numbers that surprise me the most in the Pew Polling was African-American's numbers show support in favor leaving the 14th amendment as is. This makes an outstanding point in citizenship.…
The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…
This shows how anyone born in the U.S is a citizen and has the rights of a citizen. It doesn’t matter if they only have one legal immigrant parent. At the moment you are born in the U.S, you automatically have the rights of a citizen. Therefore, everyone born in the U.S is an official citizen.…
The fourth amendment is important to all Americans and it is one of the most important amendments. The fourth amendment is important because it protects Americans from unreasonable search and seizure. “To protect Americans from the government invading our privacy and looking through our things, then finding evidence that might be used against us to convict Americans of crimes, the colonials put in the fourth amendment to free Americans from unreasonable searches and seizures.” (“Fourth Amendment with English captions”) The Fourth Amendment is: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the…
Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…
As we know there were many debates regarding the thirty fourth amendment of the constitution, which was debated in the Dail during the 10th – 11th March this year. Many deputies voiced their opinions and spoke in favour of the bill. Independent TD Mattie McGrath was the only speaker who opposed it, standing by his decision which he indicated previously/ months before hand. He held numerous meetings with advocacy groups opposed to both the bill and the referendum. Mr McGrath explained to the Irish Times back in February that he had “Serious concerns” regarding Children and Family Relationships Bill.…
The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…