Correspondence Theory Vs Factual Analysis

Improved Essays
Individual meaning and conceptual factual information surround everyday life. Claims supported by facts range from stating that the rain is made from water to the sun in our solar system is 15 million kilometers away. The Correspondence Theory takes information and attaches it to a real world comparison considered factual. Each truth is only named a truth when it is attached to something considered factual. Throughout history, the metaphysical question, of what truth and facts truly are, has been explored in all forms, relying on anything from the facts of what we already know to things considered impossible being possible by the shear fact that the idea exists.

A large gap exists in the Correspondence Theory when it comes to ideas considered fact regardless of direct experience by a human. Consider the given fact stated earlier that the Sun is approximately 15 million kilometers away from Earth; the knowledge has not been physically measured by any human from end to end. Rather, the distance has been measured by
…show more content…
Opposing theories suggest that each individual person has a created reality that is completely independent of anything other than our own mind perception. Unifying everyone's reality suggests that some greater force controls and maintains our reality as well as creates a set of factual information with relation to tangible perception that is able to be applied to everything and everyone. While this idea of unification is possible, no evidence can be given to prove any opposing or supporting viewpoints. The strength within the Correspondence Theory exists in the ability to apply a set of beliefs to a set of facts. The Sun is a measurable distance from the Earth as viewed by the naked eye and measured by scientific methodology. Most believe that the Sun is approximately 15 million kilometers away because our science has proven it to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In William James', “The Will to Believe, James provides a defensive response to religious faith regarding W. T. Clifford's position in his essay, "The Ethics of Belief" (James, 2001). Within his stance, James suggests that his views have a somewhat broader scope that Clifford’s (Princeton University, n.d.). Moreover, that in certain cases, it is not only permissible but inevitable that a person’s passional, non-rational nature will determine that person’s belief (Princeton University, n.d.). In summary, James presents that anything that is proposed for our belief is a hypothesis and that any question about which of the two hypotheses to accept is a person’s option (Princeton University, n.d.).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The human race has spent almost all of its existence searching for and building a wealth of knowledge. But what would knowledge be without application? This is why it is absolutely necessary to link facts and theories across disciplines of knowledge. The world around us does not consist of isolated occurrences, rather, everything is connected in one way or another. Therefore our knowledge of these occurrences also needs to be connected in order for our survival as a society.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Epilogue of An Elementary Christian Metaphysics by Owens, the author summarizes what was argued and discussed throughout the book. The crucial points that were discussed in this section include the definition of Metaphysics, Christian Metaphysics and how it contrasts to Christianity, as well as its status in science and the subject of Metaphysics. Overall, Owens provided a conclusion of his arguments that summarized what the Metaphysics course is about and how it is understood and determined. Metaphysics is a deep understanding of what a being is and how it relates to the universe, how it leads to the supernatural and explains how metaphysics is a science.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cantor Dust Analysis

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The universe is ever-expanding and constantly growing. The world relies on systems, structures, and patterns-- in which explanations and interpretations are often sought after. Mathematics becomes the solution and discovery that humanity seeks, in which it then can elaborate on the unknown, mysteries, and the incomprehensible. The existence of mathematics is a subtle thing; functioning quietly throughout our daily lives. Moreover, mathematics weaves itself within various aspects of our natural lives that we would never suspect it of existing within, order and chaos and fractal patterns through something such as literature.…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Saul Kripke's highly influential “Identity and Necessity” challenges a number of prevalent assumptions made by his contemporaries regarding the classification of identity statements as either contingent or necessary. (Heide, 26 Feb.) Firstly, he renounces the common habit of speaking of necessary truths, those that could not have possibly have been false, as being equivalent to a priori truths, or those knowable without the aid of sensory experience. (Kripke 130) Secondly, he argues for a theory of identity that drastically diverges from others of the time.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The matter of truth and perception are two concepts in which the definition changes depending on the individual. In the book The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, the author Stephen R. Covey speaks of an experience at the Harvard business School where and instructor demonstrated how two people can have a different outlook, yet both be right. Two variations of the same picture were given to two sides of the classroom and asked what was seen, both sides had different answers. The students argued and neither side could come to an agreement that both arguments were correct; except for a few students who tried to see the alternate perspective.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Correspondence Theory Over the last century, the world has become a place of everlasting technological advancement. The yearn for knowledge and advancements in academics has brought about an magnificent change in the world. Societies across the globe are rapidly changing and evolving due to new discoveries in the fields of knowledge, but many may ask the question: How can this knowledge be trusted? How is knowledge justified?…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two theories discussed in class were, the “Correspondence Theory of Truth,” meaning “X” is true if “X” is capable of correspondence to something in the outside, external, objective, or observant world. The other theory is the “Coherence Theory of Truth,” which says “X” is true when “X” belongs to a consistent system of propositions. The theory I think is the most accurate account of truth is the “Correspondence Theory of Truth,” it is based on the reality surrounding us, something we can prove. Unlike the “Coherence Theory of Truth,” which bases if something is true or not ideally on an idea, or because a hypothesis says otherwise. This theory seems to be based on assumptions really, not concrete evidence that will help us prove truth.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of our worldly concept’s today were not recently discovered. Many of the past philosopher’s, dating back to 500 BCE, predicted the things we know today. Just like people today, many philosopher’s had their difference of opinion. However, unlike today’s society, these philosophers did not have the resources to prove their theories. Heraclitus and Parmenides, both pre-Socratic philosophers, are known for their concepts and philosophical principles.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Pragmatist Truth

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The process for Peirce involves a «progressive investigation», which he defines as the «activity of thought by which we are carried, not where we wish, but to a foreordained goal, [-the impersonal truth]» (CP 5.407 1878). This idea is also captured in the following words of Peirce; The real, then, is that which, sooner or later, information and reasoning would finally result in, and which is therefore independent of the vagaries of me and you. Thus, the very origin of the conception of reality shows that this conception essentially involves the notion of a COMMUNITY, without definite limits, and capable of a definite increase of knowledge (CP 5.311, 1868). If for the pragmatist what constitutes knowledge is the end product, why then is he concerned with the…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The verificationist theory of meaning asserts that a statement’s meaning and whether it is meaningful or not lies in its method of confirmation or disconfirmation. This is a compelling, yet inadequate, theory. In this paper I will focus on exploring and explaining how this theory proves problematic. I will claim that this theory is immediately inadequate, since many sentences have no method of verification, based purely on content. If this were the case it would mean that outside of a scientific setting (i.e. ideally one where facts and experience are concerned) a sizeable amount of statements would be meaningless.…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    23.The Correspondence Theory of the Truth is probably the simplest, and most intuitive theory of truth out there. P is true iff p corresponds to a fact. P is false iff, p does not correspond to any fact; So the truth ‘scorpion is venomous’ is true iff there is some fact about the world that corresponds to that statement. A truth bearer is true iff it bears a specific part of reality.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dynamic Nature Essay

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Let it first be assumed that the existence of the universe, as a complete entity, is absolute and static, for no permanent description can be made about its nature if said nature were dynamic, and even so its dynamic nature in itself would be a constant, making any other assumption im-possible in the first place. The notion that the state of the universe is variable depending on the perceiving it must also be rejected for the purposes of this paper, as, similarly to the aforemen-tioned misassumption on the universe’s dynamic nature, such a notion would not allow for the description of a single complete universe, for completeness entails that no other entity may ex-ist outside of what is complete which exercises influence upon it, the existence of such an entity necessitating that whatever is to be complete must also encompass the entity. The notion that the nature of the universe varies depending on the observer can be interpreted to repre-sent the…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays