Constitutional Monarchy In Canada

Improved Essays
Constitutional monarchy consists of having a system of government where a monarch still has a formal title in a state/nation without having any real power; while the head of state of a nation holds the political power over a country (Monarchy Constitutional, 2008). Monarchs essentially act as a figurehead towards a nation, while the leaders of the state actually govern the country. An example of a country that follows this is Canada. Although Canada holds the Queen of England with some regard, the Queen herself has no real political say in terms of governing the nation. . As the days go on, the future of monarchy begins to diminish. The influence of the Sovereign will continue to dwindle as their purpose continues to have less emphasis. Such …show more content…
These rulers are an influential part in the development of history. This can be seen in the decree to innovate, explore new lands, and create reforms during their reign. The key idea to these rulers is that they had power. These rulers had control over their governments which allowed for them to be a dominant part in society. Rulers like Ramses II who commissioned great architectures in Ancient Egypt or Pericles who reformed citizenship in Ancient Athens. These people had the power to control, thus having the power to remember. As long as this power continues through the generations, so will the legacy of monarchy. What today’s monarchy lacks is this sense of power over their designated society. How will a person ever be an influence if that very person was not a part of it in the first place? Although the history of monarchy will continue in textbooks and in the effects on society, the overall effect of modern day monarchs will be lost. Constitutional monarchy allows for the Sovereign to have some sort of power, it is limited to certain cases. The idea of sovereignty thrusts traditional beliefs that cannot keep up with modern day values. This would evidently leads to its own …show more content…
As democracy becomes more prominent in countries, the idea of a single figure to have all the power in a nation pales in comparison to the “power to the people”. Citizens want democracy and are taught to prefer it at schools. It is seen as the ultimate form of government which deters the existence of any other form of government. Monarchy’s influence declines with the power it holds and the amount of people that support it. There is just no demand or need for monarchy which would lead to its disappearance. Although the royal family will continue to live on, the need for them and their status is just something the world has no use for anymore. The symbols of the Sovereign will still remain, but the value of them will be no more. Whatever is left of the Sovereign is left for governments to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    After a very traumatic experience with monarchies, the Voirpoua esd Flesil civilization decided not to have a monarchy for their government. Their government was a lot like our government today. Expect without a president. The people would choose representatives to work together to make the big decisions. Like declaration of war or relocation of the civilization.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Document 2, Jonathan Mayhew states, “it is evidently, in itself, a thing of no consequence what the particular form of government is; whether the legislative and executive power be lodged in one and the same person, or in different persons; whether in one person, which is called monarchy.” With this being said, Mayhew believed they are all equal, but no one can become a monarchy without the other powers of the government. His idea of being successful in creating high powers is having three branches of government. Furthermore, Mayhew explains more about monarchy. In Document 2, he states “But no form of government seems to be so unlikely to accomplish this end as absolute monarchy.”…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In monarchical regimes the central figure of the monarch has a double meaning, usually it is itself but also is the embodiment of the kingdom of their nation. In Europe national symbols have been used in order to returning to a local cultural heritage of the country in reaffirm a question of belonging idea of a group to ordinary people. "On national symbols lies a central role, since visualize markedly values and the auto policy definition of a community content." (Jurt, 2012). The period that followed the coup of the Republic in Brazil was confusing and according to several historians and analysis of printed documents of the time a period of disputes where the image of the elite who had deposed the Emperor had to do this in order to give…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Sun King’s Heliocentric Rule When a ruler holds authority that is only second to the divine being themselves, an absolute monarch is born. Throughout history, Europe has been home to many individuals that helped define the term absolutism and absolute monarchy. Most notably are Louis XIV of France and Peter the Great of Russia during the late 1700s. When examining a ruler’s legacy underneath the premise of absolute monarchy, how nice or how effective of a ruler has no effect.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The time period between 1763 and 1774 was one of rampant change in regards to Canada’s constitutional history. Two major changes occurred: the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774. The Royal Proclamation was preceded by the Seven Years war from 1756 to 1763 which, in North America, was namely the struggle between France and Britain for control over the colonial lands. The Seven Years War ended with the signing of the Treaty of Paris and decided the territory of New France was to be turned over to the British. The successes and failures of the Royal Proclamation initiated the conditions of the Quebec Act.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The form and content of the Constitution Act (1982) and the current status of individual and collective rights in Canada today is a third important aspect of the “rights” here in Canada. Without the Constitution Act (1982) and the current status of individual and collective rights in Canada, Canada’s society would have stayed the same regarding the “rights” of the citizens. As years go by, society changes and that means that the “rights” have to change as well in order to keep up with Canada’s changing society. As the Constitution Act changed throughout the years it improved Canada’s living environment by creating the “rights” that were needed amongst the citizens of Canada at that current time. Without the Constitution Act (1982) and the current…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Queen Elizabeth The 1st of England, was a very powerful and effective leader because of her allowance of religious freedom, her secure form of government, and strong leadership despite her protesters. When queen Elizabeth came into power in England it was her responsibility stabilize the shaky government put in place by her late sister Mary. Mary ruled england loosely and without power, this led to the citizens of England gain more power than they need. Because of the lack of power that was enforced, the government became weak and unorganized, there lacked a simple form of protection for England at the time.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, if republicanism failed, it would ultimately show that constitutional monarchies like Britain’s would be superior and favorable. In the case of Britain, aristocracies and monarchies would always be pitted against…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This much power was a lot for one man to possess. With this sole form of government there is no check or balance on the king’s power; he answers to himself alone. It is for these reasons that a monarchy is not always the best form…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canadians live their life with utmost freedom. Many do not know or realize the source that is providing them with the freedom they enjoy and take for granted. The Canadian Constitution sets out the basic principles of the democratic government in Canada, and protects citizens. Within the constitution is the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter is what sets out these rights and freedoms in the free democratic society.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They shun older government structures such as monarchies, even though monarchies are newer and are based on more modern principles. I am not advocating for monarchies what so ever, I just wanted to point out that even though democratic principles are extremely older than dynastic principles, we have found ourselves going with an older methodology. This shows that humans may revisit certain ideologies from the past, and this can be a very good thing in some cases. Hate speech laws could impede our civilization from accessing some of these old principles because they are somewhat offensive to a certain person/people. People should have the inexcusable right to self determination that our forefathers imagined we should have.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an absolute monarchy the monarch has absolute power of a state. They exercise total power over their people, however, this monarchy is counterbalanced by social classes such as the aristocracy. An example of this type of government would be the reign of King Louis XIV in France. In a constitutional monarchy the monarch’s powers are restricted by the constitution. An example of this would be the United Kingdom.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for a government to continue, it must restrain itself and his people from acting impulsively and/or selfishly. For a tyrant to remain in power he must act hypocritically. They must not act in front of the people in the same way they act in front of other tyrants. He must reserve power to himself while appearing honesty and transparent in public life. He should mirror the head of the household, and portray himself as a king.…

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A monarchy most resembles the relationship people have with God. A monarch is single ruler with great prestige and importance, that similar to how the church teaches about God. It would help with state legitimacy and reinforce the idea of God's role in the world.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays