Compare And Contrast The Sun King Heliocentric Rule

Superior Essays
The Sun King’s Heliocentric Rule When a ruler holds authority that is only second to the divine being themselves, an absolute monarch is born. Throughout history, Europe has been home to many individuals that helped define the term absolutism and absolute monarchy. Most notably are Louis XIV of France and Peter the Great of Russia during the late 1700s. When examining a ruler’s legacy underneath the premise of absolute monarchy, how nice or how effective of a ruler has no effect. On the contrary, an absolute monarch is defined by the outrageous and the absurd. An absolute monarch is defined by their actions and how capable they are of imposed their will on their subjects, despite how incorrect or detrimental others may deem it to be. And when …show more content…
Peter the Great believed that the westernization of Russia was important to it’s success and longevity as a country. He brought Russia from its feudal past to a new modern western state. Among the changes include the shift from the old style to the new style in calendars. As well as, he introduce Western fashion that slowly replaced the old Russian look within groups of elites. The problem was that only the nobles were capable of affording the new fashion, and the peasants and serfs retained the old Russian style. This caused a larger divide between the elites and the peasants which lead to further discord and unrest. He also introduced new sectors and new languages that empowered Russia and focused on science. The fact that he was able to radically change Russia is a testament to his power. Not everybody approved of these changes, but no one was capable of challenging Peter the Great. Louis XIV on the other hand had a different objective. He strived to further solidify France’s position as a cultural powerhouse. He emphasised the patronage of art, which brought forth one of the greatest results of Human ingenuity, the Palace of Versaille. During the course of his rule he spread and reinforced the his image. At one point during his rule, people began to refer to Louis XIV as the Sun King. His image slowly became self propagating and his reputation grew and everyone began to worship him even more. While Peter the Great used his authority to westernized Russia culture, Louis XIV used his authority to solidify his image as the Sun King and as an absolute

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He eventually made it the Russian navy which invaded multiple countries and defeated them thus making Peter a stronger and more powerful leader. “Peter the Great’s military reforms massively modernised Russia’s Army and Navy. By his death in 1725, Russia’s military was a force to be reckoned with. These reforms supplemented the reforms that were going on at a general domestic level” (Trueman). This quote proves that Peter was a strong leader who was able to run an entire army and made it strong enough to go on without him.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter The Great Influence

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter the great ruled the Russian Empire from May 7, 1682 up until his death. Peter was one of the greatest Emperors that ever ruled, he accomplished so much for Russia. Everything he did for his country was extremely important and the reason why he earned the title Peter The Great, He is the most influential person that ever lived. He brought Russia into mainstream western civilization, and decided that all of the children of the nobility should have some early education. Peter was heavily influenced by his advisors from Western Europe, so he decided to reorganized the Russian army along modern lines and dreamed of making Russia a maritime power.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter the Great was a very famous man during the 17th century because of his influence and power in Russia. He acquired his name because of his importance in Russian history and all that he accomplished. One of Peter's accomplishments was the foundation of the city of St. Petersburg on May 27, 1703. Although the foundation of this city was one of his visible accomplishments, one of his main accomplishments was his improvement of Russia and it's military status. He transformed Russia into a powerful Russian empire with a modern, efficient military, and increased the size of Russia.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter The Great Dbq

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter the Great’s inspiration from successful western education and ideas helped him to create a period of progress and prosperity for Russia. First of all, according to the account of John Perry, before the time of Peter the Great, the country of Russia was sheltered and only familiar with their own language and culture. They were “void of learning” (doc 8) and did not make an attempt to aid their own ignorance. He also describes the Russian people as “wary and cautious to keep out all means that might bring [learning] in, less their ignorance should be discovered” (doc 8). The document conveys how isolated and uneducated Russia was before the time of Peter the Great.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter The Great Decrees

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Peter the Great wanted “to transform his country through a process of state imposed Westernization.” He was convinced that Russia could overcome its backwardness only by adopting “the institutions, customs and attitudes of the technologically superior, wealthier and more powerful states of Western Europe.” Many were opposed to his decrees and edicts because they would “mean discarding much of Russia’s distinctive past.” Those “devoted to Russia’s unique Slavic and Orthodox Christian traditions” …” argued that abandonment of Russia’s past was too high a price to pay for Europeanization.”…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Peter was not satisfied just yet. He decided to take the piece of the Baltic Coast he won, and make it a very large trading port built up by serf and boyars. All of these solutions decreased the power of the noblemen and increased the power of the…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many monarchs during the seventeenth century used absolutism as a governing force to rule their lands. During the reign of Louis XIV, Jean Domat wrote a profound document in which he addressed all areas of government and outlined what he believed to be the tenets of an absolute monarchy. This document, entitled “On Social Order and Absolute Monarchy” defined what he believed to be the basis of absolutism and class structure in regards to the law of God and the law of nature. Absolutism is as form of government where unrestricted, complete power is retained by a centralized sovereign individual. Domat displays immense support of the concept of absolutism and outlines the idea that the people should show loyalty to their one appointed leader who is chosen by God.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    A monarch is a type of government. The major characteristics of monarchies included: (Chp. 2.2) Power was held by a king Power was passed from father to oldest son. Rulers inherited their power.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This much power was a lot for one man to possess. With this sole form of government there is no check or balance on the king’s power; he answers to himself alone. It is for these reasons that a monarchy is not always the best form…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolute monarchy is a is a monarchical form of government in which the monarch has absolute power among his or her people. An absolute monarch wields unrestricted political power over the sovereign state and its people. Absolutism was used in France with Louis XIV, Russia, Prussia, and Austria. Although all of these countries were quite different they mostly believed that absolute monarchy was necessary and justified. During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Europe, absolute monarchy was considered by some as necessary and justified because of the belief in divine right, the monarch having supreme power over nobles and government to keep stability in the country, and rule by force was essential to protect the country.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 17th and 18th centuries, two of the most dichotomous ruler’s of all time made their mark on Europe: King Louis XIV of France and Frederick the Great of Prussia. These two rulers were at opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of government and image. On one hand was Louis XIV, with his absolutist government, emblazoned with gold, jewels, and lavish clothing. On the other hand was Frederick the Great, the stalwart and humble leader of Prussia, identifiable not by his outward appearance, but by his character and personality. These two set about ruling their countries in extremely different ways.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An absolute monarchy could only be successful under the leadership of an extraordinary ruler who had complete power over his people. An absolute monarch should be able to overachieve the abundance of obstacles placed in front of him. King Louis XIV was able to obtain much of his prodigious power by creating a new, modernized army. Louis was an exceptional mastermind at trade and he had dramatically increased France’s revenue. These actions allowed him to have the unique ability to create such a powerful army.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What is Absolute Monarchy? Absolute Monarchy, Is someone who is in power, not like president but like a queen or king, for example Queen Elizabeth, she is a monarch, she is the ruler of Europe. A limited Monarch is when a queen or king is head of state, but are limited on what they are allowed to do. For example Queen Elizabeth is head of Europe but only has certain rights on what she can do. The reason why there is limited Monarch is because of Hitler, when Hitler was Dictator he started a war which had ruined most of the United States, and the war ended up devastating, and that is why Limited Monarchy…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not only did the governing models and approaches the monarchs undertook to influence the progressive or reactionary direction of their policy-making, but the European historical context within which they had to rule also played an essential role in nurturing the development of their images. An analysis, conducted without duly taking into consideration the historical and political context, would, in reality, be marked by its purely instrumental nature, hence, it would not manage to grasp the entire complexity of the issue and would lack comprehensiveness. Therefore, it can be argued that the intellectual and cultural context appeared to be one of the main reasons preconditioning the progressive direction in the reign of Peter I and Ekaterina…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Check And Balances

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Each branch of government has a check upon the other, and the two must balance one another to consummate the action. Even if each branch eyed the other skeptically, they were motivated to cooperate.” (Fox and Pope, p.94) The ability to check and balance is necessary in the government and in economics. Citizens of nations ruled by kings only serve the purpose of promoting the wealth of the king. Economies dominated by companies with monopolies don’t flourish, due to the lack of competition.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays