The Cause Of All Nations Analysis

Improved Essays
After eleven Southern states seceded from the United States in February of 1861, and the country was one the brink of a Civil War, the rest of the world watched to see if the ideals of freedom and democracy would defeat the institution of slavery and tyranny. In Don Doyle’s book The Cause of All Nations, he explains how at the outset of the war, European nations had taken great interest in America’s struggle and ignited a division between those who sided with the North and those who sided with the South. This division involved the aristocracy and conservatives sympathizing with the Confederacy, and the liberal-minded middle class siding with the Union. The American conflict was important to Europeans because the fate of republicanism and democracy …show more content…
Civil War. The war created a dichotomy between conservatives and aristocracies versus a liberal middle class. Due to the fact that the United States was one of the last remaining republics in the world, it was viewed as an experiment. The American war, many observers came to believe, would decide the destiny of democracy, and free labor generations to come (Doyle, 7). British conservatives wanted nothing more than to see the Union fail. They took interest in the war because if it ends in a catastrophe for the Union, it would be “an inexhaustible source of argument in their favor” (Doyle, 69). Sir John Pakington, an arch Tory Mp, warned people that “extreme democracy” would inevitably lead to doom and he used the U.S. as an example. He exclaimed, “Had democracy succeeded? Had extreme democracy contributed to promote the happiness of mankind? Take warning from this country” (96). In other words, if republicanism failed, it would ultimately show that constitutional monarchies like Britain’s would be superior and favorable. In the case of Britain, aristocracies and monarchies would always be pitted against …show more content…
While Lincoln and his administration were preoccupied and distracted with the South, France and Spain used the opportunity to blatantly disregard the Monroe Doctrine and recapture Latin American lands they had lost in the past. Spain’s goal was to recapture the island of Santo Domingo, Hispaniola, and Haiti while Napoleon III wanted to reinstate a monarchy in Mexico, to thwart the expansion and influence of the United States in Latin America (Doyle, 125). The Union was late to actually institute the Monroe Doctrine because they were worried that the French would ally with the Confederates. The Confederates, on the other hand loved the French presence in Mexico because it resulted in a monopoly and supply

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Shamsun Nahar Professor Foster HIST 1301 8 Dec 2016 Catton, Bruce. The Civil War. Boston, Massachusetts, Mariner Books, 2004. Cost $0.01+ shipping cost $3.99 + Tax $0.33= Total Cost $4.33 Analysis of “The Civil War by Bruce Catton” The Civil War is a novel written by Bruce Catton In his earlier life, Catton studied at Oberlin College, but he had to leave without a degree due to his service in World War I. After the war he returned home and became a journalist and an editor for the American Heritage magazine and later he became an American Historian, writing multiple books about civil war.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monroe’s bold message offered no immediate threat to such nations as Great Britain and France because in 1823 the United States lacked the power to enforce its self-proclaimed role as protector of the Western Hemisphere. Fortunately for the United States, however, Great Britain desired just such a policy as Monroe suggested. The British Royal Navy, not Monroe’s declaration, would maintain the independence of Latin America. It would not be until 1852 that anyone referred to Monroe’s declaration as the Monroe Doctrine, and it was not until the twentieth century that the United States was powerful enough to enforce international acceptance of the Monroe Doctrine. (Culbert,…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shortly before the start of James Monroe’s presidency and after the War of 1812, a historical period known as the “Era of Good Feeling” commenced in America. During the Era of Good Feelings, the country utilized the driving force of nationalism to unify itself through its time of prospering and developing as a nation. However, territorial and state rights were extremely imperative for the country's political agenda. The question of sectionalisms effect has not as often been discussed even though sectionalism was an influential factor in both economics and politics.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slaveholding was a part of the southerner’s culture and economy and they had to fight hard to maintain the black community. The European countries stand on slavery was clear as none of them joined the Confederates’ during the war. The Europeans were against slavery and saw it as morally wrong. On January 3rd of 1863 Lincoln led an endorsement for the southern region slave’s emancipation (History.com Staff,…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All the Troubles of the World and The Minority Report are two short stories that predict the future to prevent crime and wrongdoings in their two societies. The two stories, while very different, have many similarities. Together, they both raised many ideas or questions like, “Is having technology that predicts the future going to benefit the society?” and “How much harm is too much harm for the benefit of the rest of society?” The Minority Report and All the Troubles of the World make use of advanced technology that predict the future, which cause character similarities and similar problems in the two stories.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US fought for dominance over the Louisiana territory after Spain relinquished the land to France, granting them power to possibly found an empire from a small portion of Canada all the way to the Gulf Coast. American farmers were cheated after the French declared the New Orleans port off limits. Thomas Jefferson was worried that with France’s control over this large middle chunk of the US that American expansionism would be restrained and the frontier would disappear. With these dilemmas in mind and France struggling to overturn a slave rebellion and end a war with Great Britain, France was in agreement to sell the territory to the US, and the US was willing to pay fifteen million dollars in 1803 to ensure the continuation of the westward frontier. The purpose of the American frontier was to break away from all European control and forge westward, explaining why the Louisiana Purchase is a representation of the US’s vigorous attitude in making the frontier a reality and supports Turner’s thesis (Louisiana Purchase-Digital…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Was the Civil War inevitable? probably not, since it created the Nation that the United States has become. Knowing that the Civil War was a war between the Union States (North) vs. the Confederate States (South). The two main causes of war were Slavery and Religion. The Union President Abraham Lincoln resounding "no" to the central provision of the Crittenden Plan and similar proposals stiffened the backbone of congressional Republicans.(American Stories, pg.363) The Union having triple the money as the Confederacy States and having 18.5 million free people while the Confederacy had 5.5 million free people and 3.5 million slaves had nor the strength, nor food, nor Industrial production as the Union States.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although Monroe was not a candidate, he was subjected to critism often of a pretty nature. Crawford, Clay, and Jackson all saw it to their advantage to oppose administration policies. James Monroe established the landmark Monroe Doctrine, which announced the United States opposition to any European intervention in the recently independent countries of the Americas. He bought Florida from Spain and extended Americas border to the pacific through the treaty of 1818 with Britain. Monroe extended recognition to the new countries formed in Latin…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Monroe Doctrine was enunciated in December 2, 1823 by the fifth president of the United Stated, James Monroe. According to the Office of the Historian: “The three main concepts of the doctrine—separate spheres of influence for the Americas and Europe, non-colonization, and non-intervention—were designed to signify a clear break between the New World and the autocratic realm of Europe (Historian).” In other words, the purpose of this doctrine was to let the world know that not only United States, but also South America will not be touched by any other country because United States will see this act as a hostility and punishment will be see it. This doctrine was such as a shield that no one can pass through it. President James Monroe knew that European would like to colonize America, so to prevent any war between countries, it was better to drew up upon a foundation of American diplomatic ideals, but this doctrine would not been possible made it without the help of Monroe’s Secretary of State, John Quincy Adam because in October 1823, President Monroe asked for guidance to former presidents Madison and Jefferson, and they said that it was a good idea to join Britain for convenience of our country, but President Monroe was not sure about to take the right decision, so the Secretary of State advised the President to state alone without help of Britain and that was what President Monroe did and I believe the best choice to make.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milestone Three Britain was viewed by loyalists as their protector of both lands and economy. The British military protected the borders of the Americas and the shipping routes on which they used for trading. The belief that " Agriculture, commerce and industry would resume their wonted vigor"(Inglis, 1776, p. 3). could not continue if the rebellion continued. Boasting the largest navy Britain established and protected trade routes throughout the world was what many believed is what the continent needed to flourish.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Civil War, the North and the South stood firm for both of their causes and their beliefs. The United States had always admired Europe for their goals, determination and its ability to uphold central government and authority. Those in the North related their mission to suppress the Southern independence to the Austrian, French, and German revolutions that attempted to defeat aristocracy to create a more integrated and united nation. The Union associated those in the south who owned slaves to the aristocrats of Europe who had silenced the people who were leading the revolutions. Northerners also argued that not only did the Southern slaveholders have advanced political and economic…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Civil War was unavoidable and even with differences in motivation, united in two sides to fight for what they believed in. A majority of people do not want war, war is a last resort in a chain of failed problem-solving. Civil War is proof of a great divide in the Country, even when the division is not necessarily unified fronts. For each individual person, the reason for fighting was different.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    History Essay Brandon B The Civil War, was a very important war for America. This single war predicted the outcome of the United States. If we would have lost America would of been in two different countries.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the moment the ink dried on the Constitution, Northerners and Southerners carried deeply held differences about the meaning of nationhood. For the South, the nation was only an alliance of sovereign states that had power independent from the federal government. To the North, the creation of the Constitution was the start of a nation with a strong federal government that overruled the states. These opposing viewpoints were the result of the different cultural identities and political institutions of the two regions, and were reinforced as the nation developed. The South developed around an agricultural lifestyle, based upon the labor force provided by slavery, and dominated by a landed aristocracy.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays