Pradeep Kumar Chagantipati
CUW id: F00437246
Toolsmith:
Computer Science is a discipline that has been misnamed, as a matter of fact, science relates to the study of nature where computer science make things for the people to use as devices. In simple words, Computer researchers use technology to take care of issues. They write programs to make computers do new things or perform operations efficiently. For instance, they make applications for cell phones, create websites and programs to create new softwares. Now the main concern is not about proposing a new name, but raising insightful views against naming ourselves as scientists. The most essential of these barriers is a consistent spotlight on our clients and a ceaseless assessment of our advancement by their triumphs. For example, a software was created and widely used by different people around the world and the credit goes to the creators (computer programmers) based upon the software features which made people to perform tasks successfully. Making things has its own glories and they are not the same as the mathematicians and scientists. We need to consider together …show more content…
I agree with the differentiation created by the author between the scientist and the engineer. He is able to explain clearly why the computer science name is not suitable for us and produced a concise explanation about raising insightful views against naming ourselves as scientists. I stand in accordance with the author’s point of view on Artificial Intelligence, his theory explains the upcoming challenges in AI and how AI can compete with the human brains. Author’s view on television is acceptable. I really appreciate the author about his conspiracy relation between Imagination and Computer
CUW id: F00437246
Toolsmith:
Computer Science is a discipline that has been misnamed, as a matter of fact, science relates to the study of nature where computer science make things for the people to use as devices. In simple words, Computer researchers use technology to take care of issues. They write programs to make computers do new things or perform operations efficiently. For instance, they make applications for cell phones, create websites and programs to create new softwares. Now the main concern is not about proposing a new name, but raising insightful views against naming ourselves as scientists. The most essential of these barriers is a consistent spotlight on our clients and a ceaseless assessment of our advancement by their triumphs. For example, a software was created and widely used by different people around the world and the credit goes to the creators (computer programmers) based upon the software features which made people to perform tasks successfully. Making things has its own glories and they are not the same as the mathematicians and scientists. We need to consider together …show more content…
I agree with the differentiation created by the author between the scientist and the engineer. He is able to explain clearly why the computer science name is not suitable for us and produced a concise explanation about raising insightful views against naming ourselves as scientists. I stand in accordance with the author’s point of view on Artificial Intelligence, his theory explains the upcoming challenges in AI and how AI can compete with the human brains. Author’s view on television is acceptable. I really appreciate the author about his conspiracy relation between Imagination and Computer