Task-Oriented Behaviors/ Relationship – Oriented Behaviors
Adaptability to Situation – Aligning People and Direction Setting – Openness to Workers Opinion Selection of person or persons fit for the tasks and setting them up in a direction that is collaborating according to DuBrin, 2013 p. g. 110,116.
The imagination of the company and looking at the job duties and what needs to be changed in order set a direction of change for the company through using various methods and direction to form and produce the strategy. In the imagination of the company management can speak give speak to make a point for the company as leaders for openness and a relationship of team members motivation according to DuBrin, 2013 p. g. 110,116
High Performance …show more content…
g. 110,116. When having “mental ability” collaboration in leadership factors changing things in the company that needs attention using creative thoughts and being prompt to make a decision is using an thinking ability that enables the according to DuBrin, 2013 “cognitive factor” p. g. 110,116.
Self-awareness- Bring About Constructive Change Emotional Intelligence in management has an emotion that is to understand the task that are given. Managers are to be confident in themselves and what they have to produce for the company for the benefit of according to DuBrin, 2013 “reaction” to impress others p. g. 47. Managers and leaders in a membership or team all depends on the situation can use emotional intelligence to manage “emotion” or use cognitive factors to determine if a according to DuBrin, 2013 “reaction” is needed while major changes are being made to problem solve at the company level to produce cognitive change according to DuBrin, 2013 p. g. …show more content…
The autocratic style is the most appropriate in this lesson because of the according to DuBrin, 2013 “orientation” that resolves around task in the organizations p. g. 133. Additionally the autocratic style is used for a according to DuBrin, 2013 “compassion” of the a according to DuBrin, 2013 “high performance” in the company that is effective for leadership in the company p. g. 133. Thinking globally or locally the styles will change according to autocratic or democratic according to location. Within the autocratic style there are cultures such as a according to DuBrin, 2013 “perform-or-perish” and additionally there is a according to DuBrin, 2013 “consensus style of leadership” p. g. 133. It is to make sure that “guidance is met with when there is according to DuBrin, 2013 “more guidance” or when a situation of a according to DuBrin, 2013 “independence” is the issue p. g. 133. In the selection of the a leadership style the decision should be made on the “degree of versatility and flexibility” so that a according to DuBrin, 2013 “behaviors” are at a level to be a according to DuBrin, 2013 “enabled” and will a according to DuBrin, 2013 “change” and to the a according to DuBrin, 2013 “contradictory demand” p. g.
Adaptability to Situation – Aligning People and Direction Setting – Openness to Workers Opinion Selection of person or persons fit for the tasks and setting them up in a direction that is collaborating according to DuBrin, 2013 p. g. 110,116.
The imagination of the company and looking at the job duties and what needs to be changed in order set a direction of change for the company through using various methods and direction to form and produce the strategy. In the imagination of the company management can speak give speak to make a point for the company as leaders for openness and a relationship of team members motivation according to DuBrin, 2013 p. g. 110,116
High Performance …show more content…
g. 110,116. When having “mental ability” collaboration in leadership factors changing things in the company that needs attention using creative thoughts and being prompt to make a decision is using an thinking ability that enables the according to DuBrin, 2013 “cognitive factor” p. g. 110,116.
Self-awareness- Bring About Constructive Change Emotional Intelligence in management has an emotion that is to understand the task that are given. Managers are to be confident in themselves and what they have to produce for the company for the benefit of according to DuBrin, 2013 “reaction” to impress others p. g. 47. Managers and leaders in a membership or team all depends on the situation can use emotional intelligence to manage “emotion” or use cognitive factors to determine if a according to DuBrin, 2013 “reaction” is needed while major changes are being made to problem solve at the company level to produce cognitive change according to DuBrin, 2013 p. g. …show more content…
The autocratic style is the most appropriate in this lesson because of the according to DuBrin, 2013 “orientation” that resolves around task in the organizations p. g. 133. Additionally the autocratic style is used for a according to DuBrin, 2013 “compassion” of the a according to DuBrin, 2013 “high performance” in the company that is effective for leadership in the company p. g. 133. Thinking globally or locally the styles will change according to autocratic or democratic according to location. Within the autocratic style there are cultures such as a according to DuBrin, 2013 “perform-or-perish” and additionally there is a according to DuBrin, 2013 “consensus style of leadership” p. g. 133. It is to make sure that “guidance is met with when there is according to DuBrin, 2013 “more guidance” or when a situation of a according to DuBrin, 2013 “independence” is the issue p. g. 133. In the selection of the a leadership style the decision should be made on the “degree of versatility and flexibility” so that a according to DuBrin, 2013 “behaviors” are at a level to be a according to DuBrin, 2013 “enabled” and will a according to DuBrin, 2013 “change” and to the a according to DuBrin, 2013 “contradictory demand” p. g.