Repeal Capital Punishment

Great Essays
In the United States, this has been a constant source of controversy for decades. With having no problems when it was first taken place in 1608, the creator never thought of the problems that were yet to come. It was abolished for a short amount of time during the 1900s; but since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. In several state across the world, investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men. To execute an innocent person is morally inhumane, this is why all 50 states should repeal capital punishment. This is a risk we shouldn’t take, by having the death …show more content…
From my understanding, it is supposed to make criminals not commit crimes in order to get on death row but this hasn 't worked and will not work. Laws are intended to correct, by definition laws can’t obey, or isn’t intended to imitate or reproduce that nature of man.(Bedau, Cassell) The law says we can 't follow or obey the nature of man that 's exactly what we 're doing by following through with Capital Punishment. The by putting people on death row and to kill them is exactly what they did was murder because you 're taking someone 's life. This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay! It is unavoidably evident, that ethnic discrimination racial bias, apartheid, is all a part of the administration of capital punishment in America.(Bedau, Cassell) This is saying that racism in Capital Punishment is unavoidable, no matter what in this world today the minorities and poor won’t ever get the benefit of the doubt. It means that even though racism happens right in front of people they act as nothing happens. This help proves how inhumane this country in the way it is running. This is important because there needs to be a change, in a hurry because things are getting out of hand. Racial minorities face unacceptable, illegally discrimination and bias in America 's Criminal Justice …show more content…
For most it 's the one everyone would guess; They say the Death Penalty is necessary because it serves as a warning to criminals, provides closure for the victims and the only punishment fit for murder? So murdering is fit for killing someone who has just murdered another person. ("English 15." English 15. N.p., 11 Nov. 2013.) This is saying it 's okay to do the same thing a murder did if I interpreted it right. This should mean that the person following up with the execution put on the Death Row but they can’t because he’s legally taking someone 's life. This plays a huge role because it just shows how bad the United States is with dealing with all of their problems. To help people understand how it feels. It brings the families of the victim closure, allowing them to live is an injustice to the victim itself. (Put the death penalty out of its misery) It gives closure to the families by killing; By not killing the criminal, that would be an injustice to the victim. This mean they have to kill another person to help one family get over a death that has to happen and this will result in the families feeling an injustice so it 's hard either way you put it. It 's other ways to bring a family closure to also but this would play a huge role because no one would follow through with the Death Penalty because they know if they did their consequence would be death. This would be a key factor

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Burns this punishment should be death, but what about the person’s fundamental rights 's to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Although Burns does not directly address it in this chapter, I believe he feels that when you commit a crime you lose these fundamental rights. But are these not fundamental rights that everyone is guaranteed under the Constitution? Their is no clause in the Constitution that says unless your a murder, you lose these rights. Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because of its inhumaneness and lack of moral values. Many people in the United States are facing the punishment of death row. The death penalty is used to kill a person who has been convicted of inhumane crimes. Those who are for the death penalty think it is “ preventing serious harm to innocent people and a weighty reason for using a particular penalty (as in doing justice)”(Davis…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Capital Punishment

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In our society today, citizens see murder as something disgusting and as an act that goes against everyone’s morality. This is because we all live together and by seeing someone dead we all expect justice to be served and a criminal to be blamed for such a serious offence. Some crimes are not as serious as others, but if we want our society to continue running the way that it is we can’t have murders everywhere which is why we must do to them what they have done unto…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons to abolish the death penalty. The biggest reasons would be the potential loss of innocents. The people of America do not want to see an innocent person executed. Seeing that makes them think that it could have been them. The anger at the criminal justice system for not finding the actual culprit and the shame that they were forced to pay for the execution would be enough to change their minds on whether the death penalty should be abolished or not.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stephen reclaims that we as humans have respect for human dignity, we can punish people for their crimes but we can’t deprive them of everything, which the death penalty does. With the death penalty it’s basically saying to that convict that your life is basically worthless and has no human value. Nathanson believes we are not in any right position to affirm that to anyone. The main reason why this is such a big dispute is that people think a murderer has forfeited is rights as a human being, or morally free to kill him or her. To me though they do forfeit some of their rights but at the same time they are still a human being like the rest of us.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty should not be allowed in any country because of its bad influence. The death penalty has the risk of executing an innocent person. Everyone in death row has the right to a second chance to life. Sometime there is no evidence for execution just because of what they did. Other countries use the death penalty to punish their political opponents.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jesus Hernandez Is it acceptable in any case to kill a possible innocent human? Capital Punishment is the sentencing of a man or woman to death instead of him or her serving time in a penitentiary for committing a serious crime like murder. This is an issue everyone should be concerned about because taking away someone’s life is serious and cannot be undone. This issue cannot be focused on by only the government because the citizens need to know how it is affecting them as well. Families could lose loved ones due to a death sentence, and the taxpayers have to pay out of their own pockets for the cost of the execution.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Death Penalty

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yet, we can also remember who we saw next to him while crucified, Criminals and malcontents. The Death Penalty is a necessary evil to keep the world safe. To deny the importance of the Death Penalty as a punishment for simply being morally wrong is questionable when the death penalty is currently only used on those who have committed heinous crimes. Murdering rapists don’t care about society anymore.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system. The arguing stance for the death penalty says it deters murders, but in reality, the death penalty just leads to another loss of human life - regardless of the murder being an execution. When somebody tortures another human being, the government does not decide to torture that person in return. It’s the same for a rapist; the government does not rape the rapist. So, why does the government decide to murder the murderer?…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drawing a line is arbitrary. Weather you give the death penalty for multiple murders, a political murder, abuse, or drug distributors it will be a difficult decision and not ours as a society to make. No one should have the power to choose who gets the live and who has to die. Another issue with execution is that prosecutors and judges are only human meaning that they will make mistakes. Since 1973, 156 people on death row have been released due to being innocent.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics