Banning Capital Punishment

Good Essays
Capital punishment is a method of executing someone as punishment for a specific crime after a proper legal trial. It can only be used by a state, so when non-state organizations speak of having 'executed' a person they have actually committed a murder. It is usually only used as a punishment for serious types of murder such as adultery, fraud and rape are capital crimes. Capital punishment has been used in many countries all over the world. According to Amnesty International as at May 2012, 141 countries have abolished the capital punishment which is also known as death penalty either in law or in practice. In fact there are many things in this society which should be banned, but the capital punishment is not one of them. …show more content…
In fact, some states such as Alabama, the capital punishment has helped them to diminish the violent crime rate. We should emulate them in order to build a peaceful place to live. We need some form of capital punishment to convey a message to career criminals that they will not get away with these relentless crimes.

First and foremost, deterrence is one of the arguments that capital punishment should not be abolished. Capital punishment helps to prevent future crime. This severe punishment will discourage or intimidate would-be criminals from illegal action. Since society are concern in putting an end to murder, harshest punishment should be implement to deter murder, and it is non-other than capital punishment. Subsequently it will convince potential murderers to think twice before executing someone for fear of losing their own life. Punishments which are swift and solid are the best deterrent. States with high murder rates would have even higher rates if they did not use the death penalty. Even though analytical demonstrations are not
…show more content…
Some criminals who have committed many violent crimes for example robbery, rape, and murder are walking the streets like normal citizens because we are much too lenient on them. If the death penalty is instituted, there would not be as many daring and violent crimes as there are presently. Our present laws are much too "soft" on criminals. We need to get stricter. To afraid those criminals, government had strengthen legal by giving those criminals a merciless capital punishment so that can set an example to those criminals or people who want to commit a crime and it will provide a safer environment to the society. Capital Punishment reduces the chances of offenders returning to society indefinitely. Because of the merciless capital punishment, all the criminals and those people who are planning to commit a crime will be think before they committed a crime. Human being are started with only one life, once it lost will never get back again, that why life is priceless. Therefore the criminals will be afraid to losing their all whole life just because of committed a crime. The next three are Bahrain (1,900 police per 100,000), Hong Kong (highest Web-surfing speeds), and Singapore (stiff penalties for theft.) Thus, three fairly small Asian countries have achieved low crime rates. There are still very serious penalties for drug, sex and theft crimes in these traditionally conservative

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe it is a great advantage because it can lower a great amount of people attempting murder. It intimidates future criminals from making crimes as well as performs revenge to the criminal and that shouldn 't be seen in a wrong way. There are many arguments against the death penalty, but they are usually not valid when looked deeply into the topic. It is important that all states come to an agreement and use death penalty rather than some states being legal and some not. The death penalty is useful in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The death penalty serves as a deterrent and helps in reducing crime. Death from such punishment, the death penalty, is obviously irreversible. However, if the job is done right, the person being committed to death penalty should not be given chances to prove innocence. Death penalty also assures safety to societies by eliminating certain criminals. Taking murderers off the streets by using the death penalty can comfort citizens in the United States.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While the justice system tries its best to find the right people who committed a crime, it is made up of humans who can and will make mistakes. Because of this, people who are actually innocent can be determined guilty. If they are sentenced to the death penalty (and the state goes through with it) and new evidence (or even old evidence) shows that they are actually innocent, they cannot bring that person back to life. If they are sentenced to life in prison, however, and they are found to be not guilty, they are able to be released from prison. It is not an ideal situation but it is better than dying for a crime that a person did not commit.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They are worried America might execute an innocent person. However, they can prevent this by taking extra care in examining cases and evidence to make sure they do not mess up. Also, the rate of believed to be innocent people is very low. Usually with a doubt they might be innocent they just get a life sentence. “although the horrific detai­l once executions start may change some minds” (Callick).…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With poor laws to help this problem or the lack of serious punishment, criminals become careless and are bolder to commit offenses because of the mercy in punishments and the loop holes in the laws of the justice system. For this reason, the death penalty is needed. (greengarageblog.com) It doesn’t violate the Eighth Amendment, which forbids the government from striking excessive bail, fines, and cruel and unusual punishments, including torture. Supporters of the death penalty say that pain associated with the execution of a death row inmate is not likely. The U.S Supreme Court has even rejected the Eighth Amendment challenge, which stated the drug used to put the criminal into a coma-like unconscious before injecting the lethal drug is not completely capable of doing so.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They claim that with this punishment people will think twice before committing the same crime. However, seeing so many recent shootings in the media, it seems that criminals are not afraid of the death penalty and proceed with their crimes. “Deterrence works by discouraging other people who observe how others are punished from committing their own crimes” (Iuliano, 1382). In other words, a person who knows the punishment of a murder will be less likely to commit a murder than a person who does not know the outcome of that crime. The deterrence effect will eventually be accepted nationwide if studies prove that the death penalty actually helps reduce the number of homicides nationwide and prevent future murderers from engaging in homicides.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In most of case, death penalty is more likely to discourage criminals to not to do bad things. According to law.jrank.org “The purpose of punishment is to discourage a person from committing a crime. Punishment is supposed to make criminal behavior less attractive and more risky.” For most of criminal, death penalty is a kind of warn for criminals, to make them fear, to decrease the inclination that criminals do serious crimes, indirectly keep the safety of ourselves as…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They believe that if a gun was not available than these people would take more time to think things through and perhaps not commit the crime at all. Suicides are most commonly committed with a gun and this could actually save lives. Crimes of passion should also decrease when someone has to wait to be able to commit murder out of anger that they will calm down and not go through with it. Gun control will save lives and keep people from committing crimes that they will later…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The death penalty will save innocent lives. It’s the killer vs. the innocent person idea. The death penalty is the greatest deterrent on people. Therefore people aren’t going to want to commit a crime such as killing someone else if they are going to die. This is the strongest punishment on someone and this has a bigger effect on someone than life in prison.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He stands firm on his first argument, saying that the death penalty is not only the best but the only deterrent to crime. Ernest says the objection of life imprisonment is a light slap on the wrist and is not geared enough. Imprisonment only gives murderers more time to plot and scheme it does not change other criminal minds about making the same mistake. Some opponents of Haag stand argue that people have a right to life and morally we should not use capital punishment. An objection that Haag uses is that the right to life is forfeited if the crime that is broken is severe enough.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays