Capital Punishment Annotated Bibliography Essay

Improved Essays
Capital Punishment: An Annotated Bibliography When considering the possibility that capital punishment could be justified as a response towards evil action. Approvingly that capital punishment is an appropriate crime punishment in a response to murder, “the greatest crime known to the law.” As capital punishment is not morally permissible as a response to evil, then it cannot be permissible morally. If capital punishment cannot be justified towards a response in evils acts, when will it ever be justified. We believe that we only need the capital punishment act because of evil existing in this world.
As capital punishment continues to be a highly debated and also a public policies issue in the U.S.
As social science begins to join the debate
…show more content…
Death penalty really has no demonstrable deterrent effect, caused some murders. Gradually may has caused the continue for a cycle of violence and raised murder rates. When the death sentence is in offing the costs can be higher at every stage compared to the cost of cases when the penalty is not sought. Another serious problem with capital punishment is that it is “a hideously uncertain punishment.” The constitution requires for a meaningful distinction between few cases where the penalty is imposed to cases it should not be.
Within the past year the death penalty has once again become a major public policy and political issue. When polling data will suggest some of the public attitudes, though majority Americans continue in supporting capital punishment. In 1978 the National Research Council published their comprehensive review of the current research to show was more empirically supported. The growing support for tapping the interrogations for suspects involved in capital cases. Majority of the executed offenders suffered from intellectual impairments, barely adults, and suffering from mental illness or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The amount of opponents of the death penalty began to rise following the release of pictures from a botched execution in Florida. Although Florida Governor Bush defended Florida’s use of the electric chair, many Americans responded negatively to the use of the chair, calling it ‘inhumane’. Since then, capital punishment has continuously been in the spotlight, and has found less and less support from Americans. In 2011, a poll showed than only 62% of Americans were in support of the death penalty to punish those convicted of capital murder (“Less Support for Death Penalty, Especially Among Democrats”). This change in support is reflected in changes made to state laws.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Igor Primoratz Analysis

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The author is in agreement with death penalty and his defense of death penalty considers, "a life for a life". The author defends capital punishment against several objections, as follows: a right to life objection, a contradiction objection, lack of proportionality, an unpreventable error objection, and a bias and prejudice…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the process will then repeat. Medical personnel will assess the inmate each round but must first wait five minutes due to the scorching body temperature. The death penalty has been one of the most controversial topics in the entire criminal justice system. From the costs, religion, victim impact, inmate and staff psychological effects, botched executions, deterrence, all the way to those who have no opinion at all, the arguments have fallen into several different categories.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Entitled “The changing Nature of Death Penalty Debates,” by Radelet and Borg (2000) is the article that I chose for this literature review paper. In their article Radelet and Borg explore how the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, has been a topic for much debate within the US Supreme court, professional circles, and layperson over the past twenty-five years. The goal of their paper is “to review recent social science research that has examined various dimensions of capital punishment (Radelet & Borg, 2000, p. 1).” Radelet and Borg explore how arguments and support for the death penalty have peaked in later years and have begun to gradually decline as the result of the social research of our day. This pattern of…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having individuals that can testify against the false avocation that the death penalty is used to punish those truly guilty for their crimes because it displays the extreme used in the wrong instance through its ruling on the innocent. Capital punishment’s inefficiency shines through the innocents’ conviction because how is providing the wrongful ruling suppose to deter future crime it only works to diminish the public’s trust in the judicial system and the validness of the death penalty ruling. Along with innocent men speaking out against capital punishment, comes the costly and time-consuming misconception that the act of evolving the death penalty has made it more humane even though despite popular belief “the death penalty has not become more civilized with the passage of time” (Stroud III, 381). We an human beings can’t continue to turn a blind eye towards the fact that no matter how the executors of the death penalty make it look it is still the blatant taking of another’s life whether it be with a rope, a chair or lethal doses of drugs. Another reason that both Stroud and myself see as being worth ending the option of capital punishment judicial decision is the appalling conditions that create “an environment conducive to depression and hopelessness” for its inmates (Stroud, 383).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But as researchers, we can determine that we still will always have capital punishment because individuals believe some people deserve that sentence. As much knowledge about capital punishment that we have read about and its beliefs and historical past we can see the flaws. As researchers, we would like to see the difference in giving less capital punishment and giving life in prison without parole. Therefore, maybe this philosophy will change a criminal mind before he acts. Maybe this could stop individual’s from committing murder remember life in prison…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Encouragement of guilty pleas is generally an unaccepted practice in the American legal system as well. Consequently, there remains the possibility that capital punishment is allowed based on retribution, deterrence, and economy. While at times the justification for capital punishment is argued in terms…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Is the purpose to remove someone who is incapable of being rehabilitated?” “Is the purpose to frighten people from committing murder?” “Is the purpose to punish the criminals?” “Is the purpose of the death penalty to take retribution on behalf of the victim,” (Bedau, 1997)? The posed questions lead to the ongoing controversy of the death penalty.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is a topic which has many different views on whether it is permissible or non permissible. It can be permissible or non permissible in practice and/or also in principle. In this paper I am going to defend the thought that the death penalty is permissible in principle, but non permissible in practice. When looking at the death penalty in the aspect of whether it is permissible in principle I believe that it is permissible. There are multiple justifications for the death penalty that I think make it principally permissible, some of these justifications include: retribution, and deterrence.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are several debatable issues that face our society today, and one of these issues is capital punishment. Also referred to as the death penalty, this issue involves the question of whether it is moral or immoral to kill humans who have been found guilty of a horrible crime, which in most cases is murder. I will defend my position that capital punishment, though immoral in most cases, can be moral in special instances by starting off with addressing the matters of retribution and justice with regards to capital punishment using Kantian and virtue ethics, respectively. Sequentially, I will highlight two objections to my position involving the issues with cost and inhumanity and innocence and offer responses. My first argument begins with…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays