Capital Punishment: Responses To The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
There are several debatable issues that face our society today, and one of these issues is capital punishment. Also referred to as the death penalty, this issue involves the question of whether it is moral or immoral to kill humans who have been found guilty of a horrible crime, which in most cases is murder. I will defend my position that capital punishment, though immoral in most cases, can be moral in special instances by starting off with addressing the matters of retribution and justice with regards to capital punishment using Kantian and virtue ethics, respectively. Sequentially, I will highlight two objections to my position involving the issues with cost and inhumanity and innocence and offer responses. My first argument begins with …show more content…
He is convicted and sentenced to prison for life. While he is guilty of a terrible crime, taking another person’s life, it was not premeditated and, therefore, not the most extreme form of murder, so it could not necessarily warrant the most extreme form of punishment, the death penalty. (The death penalty cannot be reversed once the execution is completed, so it is the most extreme form of punishment.) However, suppose while serving his sentence in prison, this man grows angry and builds up so much rage that eventually, after actual planning, he goes on to murder one of the guards or another inmate. This crime would be more extreme than the initial one for two reasons. Firstly, it is his second murder, and secondly, it was far more premeditated than his first murder. If it is still not agreed that the death penalty is proportionate to this person’s crime, imagine if he continues to murder other guards and inmates. He is already in prison for life, so the only punishment, aside from additional life sentences, which are going to have no affect on this murderer, that could possibly be implemented at this point is the death penalty. Reason tells us that there ought to be punishment, and in this case, the person has established a history of murdering. It is our duty to offer a just punishment, and …show more content…
It is that last group of people that I am most concerned about at the moment. Killing, as a general rule, is immoral. Is it possible to be a virtuous person and still play a direct role in bringing about the death of another person? This is a tricky question, I admit. I honestly do not full heartedly support the death penalty, but I think there are rare cases in which it would be just and in the best interest of the safety of the general public. Justice can be defined as being “fair, impartial, [and] giving a deserved response” (“List of the Virtues”). If the trial for the crime is fairly administered, and we are certain with no doubt that the person on death row is guilty, the death penalty ought to be justified. Not every crime or even murder mandates the use of capital punishment. However, if the just punishment for the crime is the death penalty, the executioner and those involved in the conviction could still be considered virtuous because they are being just. Inevitably, there are going to be contradictions when it comes to virtues, which is one of the faults of virtue ethics. Even so, there is reason that capital punishment might be morally acceptable in specific cases probably involving

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He stands firm on his first argument, saying that the death penalty is not only the best but the only deterrent to crime. Ernest says the objection of life imprisonment is a light slap on the wrist and is not geared enough. Imprisonment only gives murderers more time to plot and scheme it does not change other criminal minds about making the same mistake. Some opponents of Haag stand argue that people have a right to life and morally we should not use capital punishment. An objection that Haag uses is that the right to life is forfeited if the crime that is broken is severe enough.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death penalty applies to the murders that are done savagely (kills that are done deliberately). The best approach to keep some of these brutal homicides is to utilize Death penalty more. A few individuals say that capital punishment is unfeeling, unjustifiable and it is in good. I feel that death penalty, on the off chance that it was in constrained, would be an obstacle for wrongdoing. There are numerous qualities and shortcomings encompassing the death penalty.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Against Death Penalty

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should the death penalty be abolished? The answer is a resonating, no. I say this because even though the death penalty in my mind is against what I believe about not killing humans, we have human killing other humans. So with that there must be a punishment that can help deter the murderers of this world not to kill. That is exactly what the death penalty does it helps deter someone from killing another person by threatening their own life by capital punishment.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example one argument that would go against the idea is presented from the view of a Kantian. This argument says you cannot treat a person as a mere means. This is saying that even though someone may of committed a crime worthy of the death penalty, it is not permissible for the person to receive it because that would be treating them as a mere means. In addition to the death penalty being used for retribution another way it can be used is for deterrence. It is thought that the death penalty is a good way to deter others from committing similar crimes because if they see that a person is sentenced to death they will not want the same out come, resulting in the person not committing the crime.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, in Stephen Nathanson’s writing “An for an Eye”, he suggests the second stage is the death penalty in practice. Nathanson believes the death penalty is completely justified, but in most cases it could be unjustified in practice. Legal judiciaries that impose the death penalty are not the ones leading to the execution of innocent humans. Nathanson also suggested the death penalty is inconsistent with the value of justice in society specifically. Nathanson’s argument is inconsistent with the value of justice, because the death penalty was imposed due to the extent of the specific crimes committed.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imposing The Death Penalty

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty and its use as punishment often has a whole lot of controversy whether it should be allowed or not. The reason is, the death penalty is not a minor issue like the use of school uniforms, lowering the drinking age, or legalizing gay marriage. This controversial issue is substantial because it’s about giving someone who commits capital crime the punishment of execution. Many often argue that it simply does not serve justice. In contrast, many people believe that it should be a consequence to one’s wrongful actions, serve justice, and can prevent the death of innocent lives in the future.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Certainly, Reiman’s moderate theory of retribution provides a pathway to abolishing the death penalty because many individuals that are given the death penalty are victims of an aggressive and overly reactionary criminal justice system. This is one way to argue in favor of removing the death penalty through Reiman’s argument on reactionary cycle of a “eye for an eye” mentality, which creates extreme judgments that cannot be overturned if the individual is later found to be innocent. Reiman is aware of the long tradition of the death penalty as a form of retributive justice, but he finds it impractical in terms of being an accurate judge of the intent and motives of the alleged…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Death Penalty Pros

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is a very common asked question when it comes to the death penalty. Other cons to the death penalty are, there is not really any evidence that the death penalty deters crimes, and the “offender” that is sent to the death penalty might be wrongly accused so then the system as killed an innocent. Both sides of the argument have some really great point but really it just comes down to the situation at…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Blecker’s answer explaining the correct reason to use the death penalty. He believes the reason to use the death penalty is because “they deserve it” therefore serving justice. This argument is supported by his opinion not evidence. He gives us a few examples of horrific and extreme crimes, yes, but he simply says, “They deserve to die.” Why do they deserve to die? Who has the right to make that decision?…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Death Penalty

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yet, we can also remember who we saw next to him while crucified, Criminals and malcontents. The Death Penalty is a necessary evil to keep the world safe. To deny the importance of the Death Penalty as a punishment for simply being morally wrong is questionable when the death penalty is currently only used on those who have committed heinous crimes. Murdering rapists don’t care about society anymore.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays