Adrianne Haslet-Davis writes such a vivid recognition of enforcing the death penalty by the use of deterrence. She focuses on an individual story, hers being coming close to death. She goes on and on about if any individuals was murdered the life of the murderer should be also. The community tends to always use punishments to put down criminals from their cruel and heinous actions. However, with our crime rates so high, it's plain up simple that the smartest punishment for any murderer should be execution. Without executing a person allows other potential murderers to kill freely either in jail or in our society. But with the article that was written by Adrianne Haslet-Davis she states that “ If you take lives, yours should be taken”( Haslet-Davis).
…show more content…
This process is then represented intermittently in this country during the last 35 years. It then concludes that as a deterrent, and the relatives frequency to murder that “it is a function of the cultural condition of whether a not a person is given the death penalty”(Schuessler). He quotes that if “ people are believed to refrain from crime because they fear punishment. Since people fear death more than anything else, the death penalty is the most effective deterrent, so runs the argument” From Schuessler’s focuses on how the US homicide and execution data for the periods of 1925-49 it has been organized around six topics which are; (1) the purpose of measuring the deterrent influence of the death penalty, (2) the deterrence viewpoints,(3) whether fewer murders occur in places where murder is punishable by death than in places where it is not, (4) difference in use of death penalty,(5) consistency between deterrence viewpoint and murder rates, (6) lastly general appraisal of the deterrent value of the death penalty. Lastly, Muhlhausen from US News discusses in an article about how the death penalty saves lives. He gives a keen insight that the death penalty is a good method to use in order to save the lives of the innocent
This process is then represented intermittently in this country during the last 35 years. It then concludes that as a deterrent, and the relatives frequency to murder that “it is a function of the cultural condition of whether a not a person is given the death penalty”(Schuessler). He quotes that if “ people are believed to refrain from crime because they fear punishment. Since people fear death more than anything else, the death penalty is the most effective deterrent, so runs the argument” From Schuessler’s focuses on how the US homicide and execution data for the periods of 1925-49 it has been organized around six topics which are; (1) the purpose of measuring the deterrent influence of the death penalty, (2) the deterrence viewpoints,(3) whether fewer murders occur in places where murder is punishable by death than in places where it is not, (4) difference in use of death penalty,(5) consistency between deterrence viewpoint and murder rates, (6) lastly general appraisal of the deterrent value of the death penalty. Lastly, Muhlhausen from US News discusses in an article about how the death penalty saves lives. He gives a keen insight that the death penalty is a good method to use in order to save the lives of the innocent