Cahn's Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
The idea of moral responsibility is argued between determinists and libertarians, with the division being caused by the possibility of free will. Steven Cahn offers an explanation of the different views of free will with the three opinions being hard determinism, soft determinism, and libertarianism. In this writing, I am going to explain Cahn’s viewpoint, and his idea that freedom is not compatible with determinism.
The setting for this argument begins with a criminal trial from the early twentieth century. Two boys plead guilty to killing another boy and faced a possible death penalty. The defense lawyer put up a case that the boys were not morally responsible for the crime because they were a product of their environment. The lawyer's argument
…show more content…
An example used by Cahn for this idea this involves a patient with an arm pain. The doctor then proceeds to say the pain has no mental or physical cause, but the pain is surely still occurring. This is a confusing tale because according to Cahn “if nothing were causing [the pain], you wouldn’t be in pain" (171). According to the hard determinist, every action has a cause. Another argument Cahn lists regarding hard determinism is a comparison of people to rocks. “… just as a rock has no control over the wind that causes it to break off, so people have no control over the desires and beliefs that cause them to act" (172). Hard determinists do not believe people have any effect on the world; they are only puppets in a grand scheme. This couples with the story of the boys on trial. Desires are completely influenced by outside conditions predetermined years before the action, eliminating a notion of free will. A hard determinist would not hold the boys morally accountable since they had no real choice over their …show more content…
Soft determinists still believe in a predetermined world, but contrary to a hard determinist, a soft determinist believes that free will does exist. Soft determinists argue free will on the language that it is used. An example used is of a person walking down the street, where the person is not sleep walking or being pushed, but instead acting on his or her own accord. That person is walking because he or she chooses to, not by force. Cahn states “even if the action is one link in a casual chain… nevertheless I am free with regard to that action, for I wish to perform it, and if I did not wish to, I would not do so" (174). For a soft determinist, the ultimate deciding factor of free will is whether or not the action completed was chosen by the individual. If a person completed an action but did not choose to, a soft determinist would not believe that action is under free

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Holbach’s View on Free Will Paul Holbach was a French philosopher who is a hard determinist meaning that he believes determinism is true, and if determinism is true then you cannot have free will, therefore free will does not exist. In Paul Holbach 's “The Illusion of Free Will,” he argues that people don’t have any free will and that nature determines every human’s actions and will. Free will is the ability for one to perform an action without any outside force influencing them and to be able to be morally responsible for that action. Determinism is the belief where people’s actions and wills are caused by an external force rather their own will meaning no one can be held morally responsible for the outcome for that action. The dilemma of…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human behaviors, actions, desires and memories are all subjects that are discussed in everyday philosophy. Philosophy is defined as the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. Philosophy has a lot to do with the future. When it comes to philosophy the future is already set and no one knows what will happen until the time comes and that is called hard determinism. Hard determinism is a theory that human behavior and actions are determined by external factors, and therefore humans do not have genuine free will or ethical accountability.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Charles Arthur Campbell was a philosopher who defended the Libertarian view of free will. While he was a believer in free will, he also left room for determinism because he believed that determinism does not go against the correct view of free will. He believed that in order for an act to be free, the agent must be the sole author of the act. If one is subjected to the influence of past events or a set of events one’s action is not free because if other entities other than the agent had influence upon the given act then that act can no longer be deemed morally correlated to the agent. One must also have a real sense that one could have done otherwise in order to be compatible with the view that one event does not lead to another.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, Compatibilism or soft determinism believes that that all actions have a cause and that free will is compatible with determinism. Compatibilists according to scientist believe that freedom can be present or absent in situations for other reasons and has nothing to do with the logics behind it. Ultimately, free will exist despite the help from…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Sider, determinism is the belief that every event is caused by a previous event. For example, when a ball rolls on the ground, we assume that some force (perhaps a child) caused it to start rolling. Determinism claims that all events are like the rolling ball; that is, all events are caused by previous events. Free will is much more difficult to define.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hard determinism is the theory that everything that has happened in the world has happened because it was meant to be that way. So everything that happens in the world is already predetermined. If I asked my son to pick what color shirt, he wanted to wear and he picked green and not blue Hard determinism says that he wasn’t actually free to choose because that choice had already been made beforehand. The freewill we think we have is all just an illusion, like the example given by John Locke if a man is locked in a room but he isn’t aware he is locked in the room he thinks he has free will and just decided to stay in the room, this would make his free will just an illusion. This is believed because of the universal theory of causation; we know…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, W.T Stace defends the view of compatibilism, which is also known as “soft determinism.” He argues that every event in one’s life is inevitable and is the result of past affairs, which also leads him to the belief that free will is indeed consistent with determinism. Near the end of the article he also explores the notion of moral responsibility and it’s compatibility with free will. Stace begins by briefly outlining the significance of free will because if someone has no control over their actions how can they be punished or rewarded for the way the act? He believes that many people entirely deny the concept of free will.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second form of determinism is soft determinism, also called “compatibilism”. Compatibilists are half determinists, half indeterminists. They believe that all events are results of causes. Thus, they agree with hard determinists on that.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, you turn on the faucet in your house to get a glass of water. The event of turning on the faucet was caused because you had a sudden desire to drink some water. A hard determinist would say that you had no choice and that you were always going to get that glass of water, a soft determinist would say that while an event had caused you to get the water you still freely chose to get up and fill your glass with water. One of the main arguments against soft determinism is that it is an inherently flawed argument because soft determinists change the definition of free will to make it compatible with determinism. In Cahn’s “Freedom or Determinism” he discusses how the definition of free will differs between a soft determinist and a hard determinist.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Soft determinism was coined by philosopher William James. Soft determinist believe that human freedom and determinism are compatible positions. Soft determinist are also known as compatibilists who believe in combatilism. They feel that the determinism argument is true, but they refuse to give up on the idea of human freedom and responsibility. The problem soft determinists face is the idea that life and our actions can be both predetermined to an extent but also be factored by freewill and…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays