Hard Determinism And John Locke's Theory Of Human Philosophy

Superior Essays
Human behaviors, actions, desires and memories are all subjects that are discussed in everyday philosophy. Philosophy is defined as the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. Philosophy has a lot to do with the future. When it comes to philosophy the future is already set and no one knows what will happen until the time comes and that is called hard determinism. Hard determinism is a theory that human behavior and actions are determined by external factors, and therefore humans do not have genuine free will or ethical accountability. Hard determinism contains two powerful objections, but is capable of being on it’s own.
Hard determinism argues that every event results from prior causes and because human thoughts
…show more content…
John Locke, English philosopher and physician, said once, “Freedom of choice is an illusion” ( A level Revision). Locke draws an analogy that led to his conclusion about the illusionary freedom. Locke’s analogy talks about a man who woke up in a room, but the man does not know that the room is locked from the outside. The man chose to stay in the room believing that he was free to leave at any time. In fact, the man had no option, so his ignorance gave him the illusion of freedom. As humans are capable of rational thoughts and self-examination, human beings imagine themselves to have free will and be able to choose what they want which makes them distinct from objects or animals. If choices are determined by humans’ desires, then the freedom of choice depends on whether these desires are fundamentally “free”. When humans follow the origin of their desires, they will inevitably end up at a source of actions which is external to their self-consciousness. For example, Sam wants to sleep because he is drowsy, and the reason why he is sleepy is because he lacks some sleep. His brain received a signal that triggered his desires to sleep. Sam was not free when he chose to sleep because his choice resulted from biochemical events that were outside of his control. Even with choosing the simplest decisions as which to sleep, people are not free. Hard determinismists state that each action a person performs is a consequence of the causal laws of the universe and whatever someone does is actually what he or she had to do. According to the Dutch philosopher, Benedict Spinoza says, “in the mind there is no absolute or free will, but the mind is determined to will this or that by a cause, which has been determined by another cause and this by another cause and so on until infinity” (Free

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Determinism is defined as all events occur according to the human due to external causes and in which the human has no control. Determinism is carefully evaluated due to the results of Cesare Lombroso’s assumption. It is not an accurate prediction that an offender will commit to a crime due to their external causations. Robert Agnew demonstrates in his studies that determinism isn’t a reliable theory due to the free will of the offender. He mentions other factors that can determine the offender to commit a crime by a psychological, biological, and social reason.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of Rabbi Sacks’ many points on free will is how it is directly correlated with how moral a person is. As an individual begins to act immoral, he risks embarking on a spiral away from free will. An example of this, as Rabbi Sacks points out is addiction. “The first few times you smoke a cigarette or drink alcohol or take drugs, you do so freely. You know the risks but you ignore them.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people believe that free will are inconsistent with determinism and that both words do not belong together, and that they are complete opposite meanings. Stace believes that many determinists have used the wrong definition of free will and that they disposed of the word “free will” because they cannot find its meaning. If they can accept Stace’s definition then they would believe that free will do indeed exist. To prove that the words determinism and free will are compatible with each other, Stace provided a table with some events in which the term “free will” is being used in conversations daily. One of the cases of free acts that he listed was that “Gandhi fasting because he wanted to free India,” and for unfree acts is that “the man fasting in the desert because there was no food.”…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Problems of Philosophy”, Chapter 9: “The Debate Over Free Will”, James Rachels and Stuart Rachels, investigate over freewill. Throughout the chapter the authors discuss what free will means and the ways to evaluate if we are free. The chapter moves towards the Free Will Argument using the Determinist Argument, the Libertarian Response, the Compatibilist Response and additionally covering the ethics involved with the chapter of free will. The chapter begins with the determinist argument which claims that everything that happens must happen, given the law of nature and the history of the universe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If determinism is true, then it is impossible for a person to have free will because a person that could not act otherwise than he did does not act freely. This view is also known as incompatibilism. However, according to a soft determinist, one who believes that humans are determined and still free, the first mistake about the argument of incompatibilism is that freedom and determinism oppose each other. Soft determinists believe that determinism conflicts with freedom because of the misconception of freedom.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Well, I believe this is quite simple. If there is probability then how can a prediction be right 100 percent of the time? thus if there is no set outcome then this would prove determinism wrong, thus leading to the fact that from this free will would exist. Thus my conclusion on determinism is that it is wrong in assuming that there…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They may argue free will is a term used very loosely in terms of the word “free” or “freedom”. We cannot experience absolute freedom, they would say, because absolute freedom does not exist. In certain situations, for example if we go on a hunger strike to raise awareness for a cause, we have our freedom because starving ourselves is our choice and it is in our control. However, if our circumstances do not permit us to have access to food - said circumstances can vary from poverty to being in a physical location where food is scarce or simply unavailable - then our freedom is taken away because we are not choosing to not eat. This is, of course, a general example of the concept of the term “free” being used loosely and can satisfy a number of given situations; but this is what will be used in this paper to make a…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I say this because although the believe we always have a choice they still believe in determinism and in this case I feel it does apply. Even if Stan would have tried not to sneeze it actually very hard not to and in most cases you still end up closing your eyes as a natural reaction. Stan had no control over his sneeze it was something predetermined. Now in the case of Drunk Dan I believe a soft determinism would say yes Dan did have a choice.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is there such a thing like free will? Are human actions based on real human choices or there is something else hidden behind the whole world idea? How are these all related to determinism? Well, in the field of philosophy these questions are well known and wait for a possible correct answer without any results. Philosophers have been arguing all around the “free will” topic for a long time and discovered that there is not such a correct answer to explain and attest the validity of this conception.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Determinism And Free Will

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It seems that determinism are in conflict with free will. Compatibilism is a concept that free will and determinism are compatible. In this paper, I will first state the contradiction between free will and determinism, then illustrate what is compatibilism, with most of the the problem that a compatibilist would face regarding freedom. To begin, determinism is that “human behavior is entirely governed by causal law” (Ayer, 1954, p.271).…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    CTP Final Paper To what extent does our subconscious will interfere with our ability to make solid choices? Throughout The Illusion of Conscious Will by Daniel M. Wegner and Blink, by Malcom Gladwell that is a prominent question that is presented to us the readers. That thought provoking question lead to me to look back on my past after reading both books. I became aware that many of the choices that I’ve made that I previously made, were often the result of another event or decision.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The True Puppeteer What is free will? Is it a false belief or an idea of human actions? Paul Halbach believes that human beings do not have ‘free will’, because he is a determinist. A determinist believes that all human choices, events, actions, and reactions are all already determined.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We, human beings, in the universe, all feel as though we are making decisions and using our free will each day. We are not forced to do things, we will them to be done. The higher power of God derives in us free will. Determinism is ultimately…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophical question of free will has been debated for years and has spawned many theories, papers and never ending arguments. Soft determinism along side with hard determinism and libertarianism make up the three theories of free will. By focusing on the works of Stace and Cahn, I aim to prove that the idea of soft determinism is not an inherently flawed argument and that free will and determinism are compatible. In the argument of free will, soft determinism falls in the middle between hard determinism and libertarianism.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You feel sick from the night before and have the decision to leave the room and find coffee, or stay and sleep more. You decide to sleep more, you had technically had free will, or so you think. What if the door was actually locked? And although you chose to sleep more, if you decided to leave you wouldn’t have been able to. This is when free will becomes faulty, and determinism comes in.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays