Strawson's Basic Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are. Thus, in order to be ultimately morally responsible for anything you do, you must be ultimately …show more content…
The second premise goes as follows, “[So] if you’re going to be ultimately responsible for what you do, you’re going to have to be ultimately responsible for the way you are — at least in certain mental respects.” I can concede that we cannot be ultimately responsible for the way we are, but I deny the fact that ultimate responsibility for our actions necessitates ultimate responsibility for the way we are. It is important, for the rest of the argument that we make the distinction between you and the way you are. ‘You’ are the same as your Self, whereas ‘the way you are’ is identified by factors such as your motivations, personality, and character (MPC) – your Self and your MPC are separate from each other. Under this assumption, any actions you make are decided by your Self, not your MPC. Obviously, your Self might, and probably will be influenced by your MPC, but your Self has the ultimate decision. Thus, if your Self decides to do something, and you act upon that, then you are ultimately morally responsible for your action. This remains true despite the fact that you’re not ultimately morally responsible for your MPC. Therefore, even though you aren’t ultimately morally responsible for the way you are, you can be ultimately morally responsible for what you

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the article, Catton briefly stated some comparison concerning Lee and Grant, as well. One of the similarities that he mention was they were both determined to end the war peacefully. This comparison can be proven when Catton stated, “To turn quickly from the war to peace once the fighting was over . . . in the end, help the two sections to become one nation again,” concerning Lee and Grant. These quotes support the author believes the main similarities between Lee and Grant was both two strong men physically and mentally to protect their people.…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay is going to be a argumentative essay about krakauer opinion of Chris McCandless. Krakauer mood changes throughout the book/story about how he feels about Chris he says a lot of stuff that he might disagrees and sometimes he agrees with him about it. Krakauer talk a lot of Chris because of the choices he made during the story and how he lived and how he tried to survive in the wild. I will also be talking about how he connects and the opposite of what he says about Chris McCandless. Krakauer didn't like Chris decisions about going in the wild because he was going to die there without any food or any place to stay or sleep or rest.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “We honor our past because it shapes our future,” this is one of the many quotes that Otterbein University holds dearly. Otterbein University holds this value greatly. Otterbein gives equality to all students, faculty, and others since 1847. Before any women’s rights and the abolishment of slavery, Otterbein University allowed people of color and women to receive a fair and equal education. Otterbein University is a mid-sized college located in Westerville, Ohio.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem with free will is whether or not we make our own decisions or not. In this essay, I will discuss the three main points of view that tries to answer the problem of free will. The first argument is that we have free will, which is the idea that we have complete free choice and freedom. The second theory is determinism, which says everything is inevitable and everything is caused by previous decisions in the past. The third point of view is compatibilism.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “One's philosophy is not best expressed in words; it is expressed in the choices one makes... and the choices we make are ultimately our responsibility.” Eleanor Roosevelt As individuals we are responsible for the choices we make. From choosing to do our work or not to choosing to clean our room or leave it dirty. Each choice reflects our self responsibility, which is the control we have over our lives. Being self- responsible means being accountable for oneself.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court, as Justice Madison puts it, is the Supreme interpreter of the law, and all laws that are not constitutional must be strike down. Brandeis also thinks this way. He thinks the interpreter of the law has supervisory powers. They must be impartial and not allow a citizen or government official to break the law. If citizens break the law, then the appropriate punishment applies according to the statutes; however, if the government breaks the law, then sanctions applies to uphold the integrity of the law.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to my personal experiences and past conversations I’ve come across many moments that make me agree with Tannen and her ideas. One, for example, was when person A told person B “ I am going on a hike” , Person B says “ wow ok thanks for inviting me “. This causes an argument between both people because person A simply said he was going on a hike person B assumes she was not invited because person A used the phrase “I”. Person B thinks that there is a metamessage in the conversation when she simply could’ve just asked to come along. This can create an argument because the two speakers aren't operating on the same level of talk as Tannen points out, one speaker was making more of a statement but also making the invitation for the other…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Michael Green presented a very interesting Ted Talk this week, proposing the use of wood in architecture and landscaping, rather than using steel and concrete. Mr. Green made a couple convincing arguments about the benefit of using wood when it comes to our architecture. For example, wood can give a warm feeling to a building. Mr. Green stated “you would not walk into a building and hug steel”, but more people would want to walk in and touch the wooden structures in his buildings. I can relate to Mr. Green argument of a building material can give a certain feel to the environment.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The debate about free will has been going on for years. After reading many articles, it seems that people have very different views regarding free will; two of these people are Galen Strawson and Robert Kane. Strawson believes that you cannot make yourself the way you are due to predetermined factors, while Kane believes that you can shape your own character through self-forming actions that pave the road for your decisions later on in life. Although both make very good arguments for their claim, Kane’s claim is stronger over all, therefore he is right.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay “Moral Luck, Self-cultivation, and Responsibility: The Confucian Conception of Free Will and Determinism,” Kyung-Sig Hwang of Seoul National University seeks to demonstrate from a practical stance why Confucianism fits best with a compatibilist view on free will and then, by analyzing this conclusion from a theoretical stance, argue that a deterministic view could also be accepted. He begins by discussing moral luck and responsibility, which segues into the problems with both a libertarian conception of free will and hard determinism that make them inadequate options, before continuing into an examination of texts from Confucius and Mencius which he interprets to support compatibilism. In addition to his own interpretation of the texts, Hwang appeals to other scholarly articles on the matter to help build his argument, uniting important topics such as the heart-mind, flood-like ch’i, and heavenly fate with the themes featured in the title. Why Compatibilism?…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marley Lyster PHIL 1000 Assignment 2 Prompt 2 Susan Wolf’s compatibilist predisposition evaluates moral responsibility with her “Deep Self View.” Not only does she argue that events can be fully fixed and determined and one can have some freedom in action, but also that the agent only has moral responsibility in these actions if they are in control of their deepest desires (Wolf, 460). After presenting this view, Wolf uses her example of JoJo to demonstrate a hole in her own Deep Self View that can be patched by the addition of a sanity clause (Wolf, 462). Should her compatibilist view be accepted, the sanity clause does justly remedy the blatant weakness JoJo reveals in her Deep Self View to resolve her argument’s inadequacy.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foo 1 The Charmer Why is it so difficult for us to accept responsibility for our actions? The more we are willing to accept the responsibility for our actions, the more credibility we will have. Everything we do each and everyday is based on our choices and only we are responsible for every decision we make. In the short story “The Charmer” narrated by the character Winnifred, Budge Wilson tries to illustrate that sometimes if we don’t take responsibility for our actions it could result in a great deal of pain for ourselves and the people around us.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For many centuries, philosophers have attempted to answer an important question: do we have free will? Though the answer may seem as simple as “of course we do, I can make my own decisions independent of what you are doing.” Significant philosophers like Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, Descartes, and Lock have tried to tackle the issue of free will (Ekstrom 1). Today, there are three major types of arguments for free will: the hard determinist, indeterminist, and compatibilist. Knowing the veracity of free will is something we both want and do not want to understand because it could ruin us.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays