Analysis Of Compatibilism By W. T. Stace

Improved Essays
In this article, W.T Stace defends the view of compatibilism, which is also known as “soft determinism.” He argues that every event in one’s life is inevitable and is the result of past affairs, which also leads him to the belief that free will is indeed consistent with determinism. Near the end of the article he also explores the notion of moral responsibility and it’s compatibility with free will. Stace begins by briefly outlining the significance of free will because if someone has no control over their actions how can they be punished or rewarded for the way the act? He believes that many people entirely deny the concept of free will. Yet the fact that many do not believe in free will is contradictory because their actions prove other wise. …show more content…
Free acts are caused by desires, motives or internal psychological states that are present in the individual’s mind while unfree acts are caused by physical forces or physical conditions that are present outside the individual. Stace then goes on to say that free will is compatible with determinism due to the fact that free acts are caused by desires and hopes, which demonstrates that the way an individual acts is determined by existing causes. Stace then brings up the fact that his definition of free will may not always function in every scenario because there are “mixed” cases in which it is difficult to identify whether the acts can be known as free acts or if they were compelled. Finally Stace discusses free will leading to moral responsibility and determinsim being compatible with both of these factors. He provides many different examples, his first is giving a boy a mild beating for lying. The point of this is to inflict pain and fear in hopes that he will stop lying and begin telling the truth. Therefore we are supplying a cause which will change the outcome. This example leads to Stace 's conclusion that moral responsibility requires determinism because if actions were uncaused, there would be no point to praise or …show more content…
Some people may go ahead and steal to stay alive while others may choose to act differently and do the complete opposite. Your actions solely depend on you and what type of person you are. Stace also claims that it is delusion to think that determinism is incompatible with free will meanwhile it is merely impossible for them to be compatible as determinism claims that freedom is just an illusion while free will is the complete opposite and is the notion that people are free to act and behave as they please. How can free will and determinism be compatible when people have no control of the causes that occur around them which according to Stace is the reason that they act in a certain manner? If people are not able to genuinely control their actions due to predetermined causes that make them act a certain way, then do they really have free will? Humans have no choice and no power over the laws of nature therefore it seems to not make sense that free will and determinism go hand in hand. Free will requires a person to have alternate possibilities when deciding how to act in a certain situation meanwhile determinism states that the way a person acts is clear cut and already determined due to prior causes. Therefore, if determinism were to be true, then a person would not have free will which challenges Stace’s belief. Moving on to Stace’s final

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People believe that they are a free agent because they fail to understand the true motive that causes one to perform an action. Free agency is defined as the absence of obstacles that influences one’s desires and motives and that a free agent can perform an action he has proposed to these objects. Holbach’s response states that it is out of one’s control to remove obstacles and to be in an environment that cannot influence your desires. This means that free agency cannot exist because it is impossible for a person to have control over their environment and the objects around them. Therefore, the objects will continue to control one’s will and desire.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In d’Holbach’s concept of free will, all is condensed to the physical brain and subject only to external influences rather than a soul, and consciousness. Therefore, it is unacceptable for a Dualist perspective to accept his stance on free will. Since d’Holbach views that there is no such thing as free will, a major concern of his argument is brought up being that if a persons’ actions are pre-determined and in order to fit with his proposition, it would not be morally correct to punish that individual for their actions. It would still be practical to isolate a harmful individual from society from d’Holbach’s view, except it would only be done for logical reasons and not for disciplinary…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A dilemma is considered a situation in which you have to make a difficult choice. Vaughn states that free will is when "at least some of our choices and actions are not decided for us or forced upon us but are genuinely up to us." (Vaughn, pg.333) Free will is such a dilemma because for humans, it is natural to think that events are caused by previous events, but then again, it is natural to think that we act freely as well, yet together, these plausible beliefs cannot be true. The two general ways to respond to this problem are Compatibilism and Incompatibilism. The ladder says that free will and determinism are not compatible.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compatibilist argues that free will and determinism are compatible with each other. On the other hand, the Incompatibilist states that free will and determinism are incompatible (397). For the incompatibilist, determinism does apply to freedom of the will. However, he claims that if things are predetermined then the person does not exhibit free will. The person will be predetermined to make only a certain choice, so he is not fully exhibiting free will (400).…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The meaning to be truly free is related to a good will. Freedom is not to do anything that you want. Freedom is also not to live concurring to a law designed by someone or something else. This is because what you “want” is obligated on you by strengths separate from yourself. Meaning, someone is given their wants and they are therefore not selected freely.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Indeterminism

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Schlick agreed with the mainstream compatibilists that freedom means the opposite of compulsion. He theorized that there are internal constraints that act on our ability to act of our own free will. These internal constraints such as mental illness and neuroses prevent us from making rational decisions of our own free will and this leads us back to the theory of determinism. If an action is the result of deeply disturbed irrational desires, then it is not accurate to say that the action is free. Therefore we cannot hold the individual responsible for his or her…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free-Will Vs Determinism

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is due to the explanations as to why anything within the world can have a determined cause. According to Edwin Locke, To deny the possibility that man can have knowledge, however, is a self-contradiction (Locke and Boyd). This quote describes that without knowledge and Determinism, we are unable to determine causes for the phenomena that occur throughout human life. He continues a point that without any existent knowledge, no determinists can provide valid statements because no knowledge can support the statement, therefore concluding it as invalid. With the accumulation of knowledge, modernly we are capable of expressing intelligible reasoning to situations that appear as “unknown/undetermined”.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom Vs Determinism

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I lean towards the freedom part but I will try to stay as neutral as possible. Determinism is belief that all events even human actions are predetermined. Many philosophers say that this implies that we as individuals have no free will. Also that we can’t be held responsible for the things we do. Ultimately everything that we do in our lives is already in place.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every action completed has no foundation from which it is based from. In other words, there are no outside agents of causation that explain behaviors. Concepts such as determinism and freedom aren’t compatible because they both juxtapose one another. One cannot truly act freely if the choices presented to them force them to choose one behavior out of the seemingly endless amount of possible behaviors they could’ve chosen. This “grants the illusion of free will instead of free will itself, creating a dissonance between true free will and elements of determinism” (Perry 395).…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soft- determinism states that every action has a cause, but does not rule out the possibility of free will (Sider). According to Sider, a misunderstanding of the word “freedom” makes some believe free will and determinism cannot coexist. He highlights the fallacies of determinism and libertarianism, and suggests we humans need a clearer explanation of freedom. Perhaps the most alarming problem of determinism is the absence of accountability. If determinism is true, people cannot be blamed or punished for unfree actions.…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays