Mind: R. E. Hobart's Conditional Analysis Of

Improved Essays
In the first section of Mind, R. E. Hobart presents a series of arguments in favor of compatibilism between free will and determination. In this essay, I will provide an analysis of his interpretation of power and discuss some of the critical parts of his argument. Finally, I will address two primary criticisms towards Hobart’s conclusion in favor of compatibilism using the conditional analysis of power.

Hobart’s Conditional Analysis of Power:

At the beginning of the article, Hobart establishes that he does not intend to tamper with the meaning of free will or determinism for it would be “unpardonable”. However, it is my belief that his efforts result in adjusting the definition of free will (intentionally or accidentally), which he defines
…show more content…
If determinism is true, then it means that each and every action is ultimately caused by past events in such a way where, according to the laws of nature, they lead to one and only one effect - as is suggested by D’Holbach in the above example. With Hobart’s argument for power, this person who chooses not to drink the water has demonstrated free will because he is capable of drinking of the water even though, given the state of the universe and the laws of nature, he could never have made that decision. If our actions are determined by reasons as determinists claim, then I see no reason to believe that having the power to do something is sufficient to prove that he has free will as this man could not have been compelled to any other choice in the current state of the …show more content…
As a final twist on our poisoned water scenario, let’s presume that this man is determined to purify the water and return it to being drinkable, yet has none of the necessary resources. Based on the standard form of the conditional analysis of power, it is clear that this person does not have the power to purify the water. This scenario also raises question to the reliability of treating power as a natural law as there is no longer a direct correlation between the wish--will--act series as Hobart claims.

Conclusion:

Hobart’s argument for the conditional analysis of power presents a solid foundation in support of compatibilism, though it is not without its flaws. I believe he makes a strong argument in favor of a natural law of power that aligns with both free will as well as determinism. However, his arguments have not convinced me that the conditional analysis of power is an accurate representation of what it means to have free will and is not sufficient enough to justify compatibilism between free will and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    so of course the use of his work will be to prove and not disprove the claim. All the works cited are in support of his argument no…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I argue that Ayer’s reasoning of compatibilism is false. The reason this is true is because his explanation and reasonings of the topic are completely contradictory. Throughout the essay, I will call into question what Ayer believes to be true, while at the same time, try to “take a walk in his shoes,” to see where he is coming from and to dig deeper into why Ayer believes his theories on the topic are correct. Ayer holds the belief that free will and determinism can both be true at the same time. He states his belief of free will as when, “it is implied that I could have acted otherwise,” and believed that I could have acted otherwise, then i am said to be morally responsible for what i have done (Ayer).…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stace's Compatibilism

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    His application where he points out that if someone were to be predicted to lie based on previous causes leading up to a moment, and they did actually lie, they are still freely making that decision to lie because it is based on their personal desires which if they were different would alter the choice. This rationale to separate the idea of freedom of choice by pointing out the difference between power to make a decision and to recognize a decision is powerful and does serve to strengthen his position. He points out that free will and predictability are compatible with an example of expecting an honourable man to act honourably and how common sense would still dictate the man is choosing to act with honour. The idea of a separation between types of freedoms of choice is a recurring theme in the three schools of thought all of which generally accept the kind of freedom which Stace refers to as free will but is generally called the freedom of “self-realisation” or the knowledge of an ability to make a choice. The other kind of freedom is what philosophers would call free will traditionally and is the power to actually carry out either choice in a situation regardless of circumstance.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Of the System of Man’s Free Agency” D’Holbach explains his argument that human action is determined by the laws of nature. He proposes that humans are part of the natural world and therefore governed by necessary laws, so they have no free will. On this essay I will argue that D’Holbach’s argument on motive is not a good one; I will explain the argument, present why do I think the argument fails and consider ways to defend the argument from my own attack. D’Holbach’s Argument D’Holbach concedes that “To be undeceived on the system of his free agency, man has simply to recur to the motive by which his will is determined; he will always find this motive is out of his own control. It is said: that in consequence of an idea to which the mind gives birth, man acts freely if he encounters no obstacle”.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people believe that free will are inconsistent with determinism and that both words do not belong together, and that they are complete opposite meanings. Stace believes that many determinists have used the wrong definition of free will and that they disposed of the word “free will” because they cannot find its meaning. If they can accept Stace’s definition then they would believe that free will do indeed exist. To prove that the words determinism and free will are compatible with each other, Stace provided a table with some events in which the term “free will” is being used in conversations daily. One of the cases of free acts that he listed was that “Gandhi fasting because he wanted to free India,” and for unfree acts is that “the man fasting in the desert because there was no food.”…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3. If determinism is true, then we could not have acted freely. To understand the argument, we must first know what “determinism” and “free will” are.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Take a poker player. They associate winnings with probabilities, now if we were under the assumption of a determinist then these probabilities would be useless as regardless of if the probability was high or low the outcome would be set. This is fine until you understand that probabilities contradict a determinist view. This is because even if the next card that’s flopped is based on probability, the actual event is total random as it’s not a given that the highest probability will occur. Now, how does this equate to the idea that we have free will.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet the fact that many do not believe in free will is contradictory because their actions prove other wise.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter nine in Problems from Philosophy by James Rachels and Stuart Rachels titled “The Debate Over Free Will” is about the three arguments over free will. They are Determinism, Libertarianism, and Compatibilism. The Determinism argument is, as Rachels states, that our actions are manipulated by forces we cannot control. The second argument Rachels presents is Libertarianism which states that some actions we freely choose and that we are also not made to do so. The last argument is Compatibilism and according to Rachels, it states that actions are both free and determined.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we create a scenario where you are being robbed at gunpoint, you have two options, you can give the robber your wallet and valuables or you can refuse and be killed. In this case you hand over everything and the robber runs off leaving you alive. Now a hard determinist would say that this proves determinism. The act of you handing over your wallet was caused by the robber threatening death, you did not have the power to not give them your wallet. By using our new definition of a free act we can show that in fact you chose freely but the circumstances before you handed over your wallet determined your action.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, to believe that no person on this earth has any choice in their life seems to take the meaning away. I agree with Kierkegaard, each individual must give meaning to their own life. If everything was being determined for us, I don’t believe there would be a meaning of our existence. Thus, propelling the idea of existentialism ahead of causal determinism and accusing Harris of being morally responsible for his…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We, human beings, in the universe, all feel as though we are making decisions and using our free will each day. We are not forced to do things, we will them to be done. The higher power of God derives in us free will. Determinism is ultimately…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays