D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will

Amazing Essays
Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.
The first theory
…show more content…
D’Holbach is on the Materialist side of the spectrum, whereas I fall on the Dualist side and therefore I can not agree with the view that human life is reduced to the physical brain and not the free soul. The problem with d’Holbach’s viewpoint on free will is that if there is no freedom of choice or free will, then there would be no meaning in our lives. Humanity would be diminished to existing as automatic machines subjected under the orders of external factors. But, humans do have a certain amount of freedom in the Compatibilist concept of free will. In d’Holbach’s concept of free will, all is condensed to the physical brain and subject only to external influences rather than a soul, and consciousness. Therefore, it is unacceptable for a Dualist perspective to accept his stance on free will. Since d’Holbach views that there is no such thing as free will, a major concern of his argument is brought up being that if a persons’ actions are pre-determined and in order to fit with his proposition, it would not be morally correct to punish that individual for their actions. It would still be practical to isolate a harmful individual from society from d’Holbach’s view, except it would only be done for logical reasons and not for disciplinary

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    People believe that they are a free agent because they fail to understand the true motive that causes one to perform an action. Free agency is defined as the absence of obstacles that influences one’s desires and motives and that a free agent can perform an action he has proposed to these objects. Holbach’s response states that it is out of one’s control to remove obstacles and to be in an environment that cannot influence your desires. This means that free agency cannot exist because it is impossible for a person to have control over their environment and the objects around them. Therefore, the objects will continue to control one’s will and desire.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hard determinism arguing that life without free will is not bad, but, Accepting hard determinism is about inconceivable. It also argue that if people have freewill then, they do not have any moral responsibility and people were fully free to do anything. Nor is it clear that one could stop believing in free will (pg. 119-120). Whereas, libertarian is opposite to hard determinism and called indeterminism.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Those who believe in this idea are called “hard” determinists, which they deem no one is responsible for their actions. However, the alternative to hard determinism is Libertarianism. Libertarianism is the act of believing humans are free from determinism and its forms. Libertarians believe that determinism and free will cannot be as one. Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If we, as a society agree in punishment for breaking laws, then we, as a society must believe in free will. Humans must have free will or we are punishing people for actions for which they had no control. There cannot be moral responsibility if everything is determined, as the responsibility would not fall on the human, but rather the force that made the predetermination. Philosopher John Locke discusses this in his book An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. He states that the ability to suspend the fulfillment of one’s desires shows that we are have free will.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If people are not able to genuinely control their actions due to predetermined causes that make them act a certain way, then do they really have free will? Humans have no choice and no power over the laws of nature therefore it seems to not make sense that free will and determinism go hand in hand. Free will requires a person to have alternate possibilities when deciding how to act in a certain situation meanwhile determinism states that the way a person acts is clear cut and already determined due to prior causes. Therefore, if determinism were to be true, then a person would not have free will which challenges Stace’s belief. Moving on to Stace’s final…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Indeterminism

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Schlick agreed with the mainstream compatibilists that freedom means the opposite of compulsion. He theorized that there are internal constraints that act on our ability to act of our own free will. These internal constraints such as mental illness and neuroses prevent us from making rational decisions of our own free will and this leads us back to the theory of determinism. If an action is the result of deeply disturbed irrational desires, then it is not accurate to say that the action is free. Therefore we cannot hold the individual responsible for his or her…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Freedom of the will, according to Frankfurt, is compatible with determinism; however, his inability to refute the possibility that second order desires may be predetermined allows for the conclusion that all humans truly do not possess freedom of the will and are only under the illusion that they do. In order to fully understand free will, it is important to define it. Free will is determined as the ability to choose between many options and act upon the choice chosen.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some philosophers believe that human have self-control over their actions, and others say that there is no such a thing as self-control. Philosophers have long debated the concept of free will among humans. Is there really such thing as true free will? Some philosophers like Sartre claim that humans have free will, while others philosophers such as LaPlace argues free will is just an illusion, and humans are not inherently free will. According…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In contrast, Sam Harris objected about the real concept of freewill. Harris is a neuroscientist and he believes that there is no such thing as freedom. According to him our brain acts upon our sub-conscious activities and human are just a puppet to their brain. As much as it sounds disturbing, it is a fact to some degree. In the book “free will” he explained that our…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free Will Vs Determinism

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A neutral stance to this is the claim that “ one can be held morally responsible for one’s actions only if one could have acted otherwise in a given set of circumstances.” (The Philosophical Review, page 440). Determinist would disagree with this claim because it is if an agent is never in control of the situations that they are forced into, how can they be morally responsible. Free will does not easily tie into the premise because if we choose our own action then we should be held morally reasonable for them, but if one said that “X” did Y because she/ he could it fails to prove moral responsibility and seems as if our action or arbitrary or random. However if an act is described as “not determined” or “uncaused” that means that free will cannot be used because the action is random therefore not in the agent’s power, thus making morally responsibility invalid. Simply, without the just the agent being the cause of an action, they cannot be held to moral…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays