Ayer's Argument For Compatibilism Successful?

Improved Essays
In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon. After providing some background material within this essay and presenting the argument for compatibilism, an evaluation from myself will be included to further discuss the topic. …show more content…
In studying this argument by Ayer, I have drawn a conclusion that Ayer’s defense of compatibilism is successful. I am not a philosopher and this is my first time studying the subject matter and that may play a crucial role in the drawing of my conclusion. However, I would like to briefly discuss two points that led me to me to believe that Ayer’s argument was indeed successful. Firstly, I agree that free actions are not uncaused actions. Free actions are choices that are caused in a particular way. An example would be deciding which coffee creamer to use out of the two in my refrigerator. I like both of them just the same and my decision to choose one over the other is left at random with a coin toss. Therefore, the coin toss is the cause of my choosing of one of the flavors. A second reason of why I agree with the argument for compatibilism is because of the justification through Ayer’s definition of what a free action is. If my action and choice was voluntary without anyone compelling me to do so and I could have acted differently just by choosing so, my action was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Chapter nine in Problems from Philosophy by James Rachels and Stuart Rachels titled “The Debate Over Free Will” is about the three arguments over free will. They are Determinism, Libertarianism, and Compatibilism. The Determinism argument is, as Rachels states, that our actions are manipulated by forces we cannot control. The second argument Rachels presents is Libertarianism which states that some actions we freely choose and that we are also not made to do so. The last argument is Compatibilism and according to Rachels, it states that actions are both free and determined.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, W.T Stace defends the view of compatibilism, which is also known as “soft determinism.” He argues that every event in one’s life is inevitable and is the result of past affairs, which also leads him to the belief that free will is indeed consistent with determinism. Near the end of the article he also explores the notion of moral responsibility and it’s compatibility with free will. Stace begins by briefly outlining the significance of free will because if someone has no control over their actions how can they be punished or rewarded for the way the act? He believes that many people entirely deny the concept of free will.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I argue that Ayer’s reasoning of compatibilism is false. The reason this is true is because his explanation and reasonings of the topic are completely contradictory. Throughout the essay, I will call into question what Ayer believes to be true, while at the same time, try to “take a walk in his shoes,” to see where he is coming from and to dig deeper into why Ayer believes his theories on the topic are correct. Ayer holds the belief that free will and determinism can both be true at the same time. He states his belief of free will as when, “it is implied that I could have acted otherwise,” and believed that I could have acted otherwise, then i am said to be morally responsible for what i have done (Ayer).…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augustine And Evil

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Free will may be viewed in two opposing ways: compatibilism and incompatibilism. According to the compatibilist tradition an action can be both totally free and also entirely caused by previous events in that your choice of action is determined by your wants, desires, values, etc. Everitt describes compatibilism concisely as: “to say you act freely is compatible with saying that your action had a cause”. By contrast the incompatibilist view, more popular among theists, does not allow an action to be both free and caused by prior events. For a choice to be genuinely free nothing must occur which guarantees the outcome of a decision, prior events may only have an influence on the free…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first section of Mind, R. E. Hobart presents a series of arguments in favor of compatibilism between free will and determination. In this essay, I will provide an analysis of his interpretation of power and discuss some of the critical parts of his argument. Finally, I will address two primary criticisms towards Hobart’s conclusion in favor of compatibilism using the conditional analysis of power. Hobart’s Conditional Analysis of Power: At the beginning of the article, Hobart establishes that he does not intend to tamper with the meaning of free will or determinism for it would be “unpardonable”.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Determinism And Free Will

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It seems that determinism are in conflict with free will. Compatibilism is a concept that free will and determinism are compatible. In this paper, I will first state the contradiction between free will and determinism, then illustrate what is compatibilism, with most of the the problem that a compatibilist would face regarding freedom. To begin, determinism is that “human behavior is entirely governed by causal law” (Ayer, 1954, p.271).…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 3rd Reflective Essay Amr Eid Radwan Are we free? - Exploration of Will by Exploiting D’Holbach’s Arguments - P eople always want to believe that they are free. But is this the truth? Are we the ones who determine their fates? Are there any external factors that cause our actions?…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As autonomous humans we generally think we are morally responsible for all the things we have done. That being said, it is only natural to believe that for a person who is morally responsible for what he/she has done than they could have done otherwise. Meaning they could have do the exact opposite of what they did. This alludes to the question that many philosophers have struggled with, this being, what does it mean when someone says that an individual who acted in a particular way “could have done otherwise?.” R. Chrisholm takes this concept as the fundamental question in our metaphysics of action and has formulated many explanations for the so called “free-will problem.”…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The issue I will address in this paper is known as “compatibilism.” By definition, compatibilism is the idea that determinism is true, every event in the world is caused, and that free will still exist. I will explore Walter Terrence Stace’s version of compatibilism, explaining why he thinks learned professors of philosophy and psychology incorrectly define free will by confusing the meaning of the words. I will assess Stace’s argument; that indeterminism is not what it is meant by the phrase “free will.” Freedom is compatible with causal determinism because free will can be determined by the psychological states of an individual and the effects of physical forces or conditions upon that individual.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the action, in society everyone is morally responsible for their actions. However, in to hold a person morally responsible for action or decision he must make that decision freely. Philosophers have argued about this concept of the existence of free will and having moral responsibility. Furthermore, there are those philosophers that do not question free will, but rather the idea of being help morally responsible for an action.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nickolas Geeker Summary of A.J. Ayer’s Freedom and Necessity In Ayer’s essay Freedom and Necessity, he discusses his argument for the idea of Determinism, which states that humans act the way they do because of the way existing factors in their lives make them do so, and that it is not a product of their freewill. He also discusses that these already existing factors are known as casual laws, which are past experiences, feelings, and other factors that make people formulate whom they are. Ayer also states that he believes that the theory of Determinism and the idea of freewill can coexist. But he explains that even though people are drawn to act a certain way by these laws, they are not constrained to their choices and ultimately…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays