Determinism Vs Free Will In Communication

Decent Essays
Com 295 – 07 In communication there are two different ways on how you can look at communication theory; one way is free will scope, the other a determinism scope. These two ways of evaluating communication theory can affect many different aspects throughout communication. Free will means that humans acts are voluntary. It also says that we are free agents who can decide to respond differently under identical sets of circumstances. This means that we as humans have freedom to respond to our circumstances and that reaction may be different then another person who faced the exact same circumstances. With free will each person has control over their own actions and their actions are voluntary.
Determinism means that behavior is caused by heredity
…show more content…
Free will, is the ability to choose how a person reacts which affects the outcome of the situation and affects the pathway they take in their life. While determinism says that no matter what happens your pathway in life is already predetermined. This means that these two cannot coexist together, because free will says that you can control the fate of your life, and on the other hand, determinism says that your fate is already predetermined and you as a person do not have control over what happens. It would not be possible for these two to be hybrid together. They contradict each other in how life plays out and whether you have control of your decisions and actions; or if your life events and decisions are already predetermined for you by your environment and genetics. Since these two are mutually exclusive depending on what scope you look through, it can have an effect on how you communicate with other …show more content…
With free will it holds the people communicating responsible for what they say and do because it was their own choice to act out those actions or say what they did. While with determinism your words and actions are already predetermined based on heredity and environment. Thus, affecting communication because in that theory people cannot be held responsible for their words and actions because they did not choose them, they were already predetermined for them. These are important in communication theory because the different theory you believe in would have a different effect on how you hold other people responsible while communicating with them. These are important to understand, especially in interpersonal relationships. If your partner looks at communication through the free will scope and you look at it through the determinism scope there can be conflict within the relationship; because they could hold you responsible for things that you believe you have no control over. With determinism and free will I think they are both important to communication theory and can be a vital thing that shapes how you look at communication. The scope you look through can influence your communication

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Free will is humans acting as their own kind and making the choice to do something or not do it. In order for humans to make a free will choice, morality and determinism is involved. A human will have it in them to make a choice and understand what that choice means. The effect of that that choice will have, whether the choice is to do good or evil. I believe that events are determined but the choices and experiences are free to that person which makes free will an…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Determinism is an opposed of freewill, in which every action is prearranged by past. The problem with this policy is that no one could be blame for their action whether it’s good or bad-since everything is prearranged. Determinism falls into two further categories: hard determinism and soft determinism. It also means that freewill is predetermine too. Unlike determinism freewill is a very important factor for taking concern, which can create a dilemma in society to punish or praise anyone for his or her actions.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Previous events are the cause of agents’ decisions and actions; agents cannot control or change the course of action because “everything that happens must happen in an unalterable, preset fashion” (Vaughn 219). The agent’s freedom of choice depends on the type of deterministic position since it presents two views: hard or strict determinism and soft determinism or compatibilism. When it comes to soft determinism, agents have the ability to choose not to perform an action that was determined to happen because they have a certain level of freedom to perform actions led by their desires, which makes possible the idea of determinism and free will as two compatible notions, attempting to solve the incompatible problem. Whereas, the hard deterministic position is incompatible with freedom of the will because agents are not free; they cannot control their behavior or choices. Choices are a product of universal causation or laws of nature instead of being caused by the agent’s desires and reason.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freedom of the will, according to Frankfurt, is compatible with determinism; however, his inability to refute the possibility that second order desires may be predetermined allows for the conclusion that all humans truly do not possess freedom of the will and are only under the illusion that they do. In order to fully understand free will, it is important to define it. Free will is determined as the ability to choose between many options and act upon the choice chosen.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It can have argued, that more than this is required and that we are not free unless we are able to choose between the alternatives. But a counter argument to this is that as long as if you have said I would have done otherwise had I wished, then it was your own choice that prevented me from doing what I was willing to do, and what I did was of my own free will and choice. Frankfurt argued that what is distinctive about a person is their ability to reflect upon their desires And to decide to whether or not they want to have them. If we do what we want and what we wanted is something we take ownership of, then we have a relevant kind of…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Sartre in this article, decisions cannot be made on abstract moral principles because these moral principles are too generalized directly apply to concrete realities. More specifically, he states, “If values are vague, and if they are always too broad for the concrete and specific case we are considering, the only thing left for us is to trust our instincts” (Sartre 351). People, without moral principles, would not feel restricted to act in a certain “morally correct” way, for there would be no “morally correct” way. As Sartre believes, each particular situation is subject to an individual’s interpretation. The individual, then, has the freedom to act in any way they wish, and also the freedom to judge, based off of the responses of others and their own ethical anguish, whether or not they made the best possible decision.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Libertarianism is a political philosophy that believes that we have free will and that it does not work together with determination. They believe that free will is the way for us to be morally responsible. They also believe that it is in their power to create their own future with the ability that they are given to choose whatever, whenever. They believe that things could have been done differently, so it is our responsibility to make the right decisions. It is freedom of predetermination and one's nature.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Som Determinism

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This means that if an external factor is causally determined, then your ability to do something differently in a situation is nowhere near your control. Depending on the situation we encounter ourselves in, and the way we respond to it, we might argue that based on the outcome of the situation, whether it is good or bad, it makes humans determined. But then again, we also act based on our desires and emotions, which makes it seem that we are acting freely. The dispute of free will and determinism has drawn attention to many people, including me.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soft determinism, also known as compatibilism and self-determinism, is the theory that determinism is true and that it is also compatible with freedom and responsibility. In other words, our actions are free when we ourselves are the causes of those actions. We act based on our desires, wants, and intentions, therefore our actions are considered free because we act based on our choices rather than external forces. Keep in mind that just because a person’s actions are acted out by their choices rather than external factors, does not mean that what a person wants is not determined by those external forces. Extrinsic coercion determines what a person desires, but as long as their actions are constant with their choices, their actions will always be considered…

    • 1054 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays