Hard Determinism Vs Free Will

Improved Essays
Show More
The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose. In this paper, I am going to be arguing …show more content…
Those who believe in this idea are called “hard” determinists, which they deem no one is responsible for their actions. However, the alternative to hard determinism is Libertarianism. Libertarianism is the act of believing humans are free from determinism and its forms. Libertarians believe that determinism and free will cannot be as one. Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism. Lastly, Compatibilism or soft determinism believes that that all actions have a cause and that free will is compatible with determinism. Compatibilists according to scientist believe that freedom can be present or absent in situations for other reasons and has nothing to do with the logics behind it. Ultimately, free will exist despite the help from …show more content…
In Paul’s premise, he argues that if we have determinism, then there isn’t any free will and determinism is outright true and free will does not exist. Holbach believes that free will is controlled by nature itself. If outside sources contribute to our behaviors, how can we be responsible for our own actions. Holbach believes that if something isn’t in our control, then there is something, whether internal or external that is forcing us to do the things we do. Morally speaking, we don’t dictate any decisions, we don’t make up what comes to our minds nor are we free due to these things. No action we choose to partake in is determined by us, but predetermined and forced due to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    How Did Charles Arthur Campbell Encourage Libertarianism
    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages

    How Did Charles Arthur Campbell Encourage Libertarianism

    Charles Arthur Campbell was a philosopher who defended the Libertarian view of free will. While he was a believer in free will, he also left room for determinism because he believed that determinism does not go against the correct view of free will. He believed that in order for an act to be free, the agent must be the sole author of the act. If one is subjected to the influence of past events or a set of events one’s action is not free because if other entities other than the agent had influence upon the given act then that act can no longer be deemed morally correlated to the agent. One must also have a real sense that one could have done otherwise in order to be compatible with the view that one event does not lead to another.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ayer's Argument For Compatibilism Successful?
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ayer's Argument For Compatibilism Successful?

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Chisholm's Model Of Indeterminism
    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chisholm's Model Of Indeterminism

    Determinism is a philosophical idea that attempts to place all events that occur as inevitable as they are predetermined by previous events and the laws of nature. However there are many who came to be known as indeterminists who reject the notion that free will is absent from the process that causes events to occur. Indeterminists believe that there are possible events that have different probabilities of occurring based on human beings free will. Then Chisholm’s view of the agent-casual theory presents humans as always going through a decision process when making an action that leads up to an event they work through their desires in first and second order volitions and then they act. These actions are free from previous events and cannot…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Consequence Argument Analysis
    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Consequence Argument Analysis

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Paul Holbach's The Illusion Of Free Will
    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Paul Holbach's The Illusion Of Free Will

    Holbach states that it is not free will that causes you to perform an action, but it is his desire or motive which decides to perform an action. Meaning, the reason you decided to perform an action was to convince your opponent. The desire to convince your opponent was what made you perform your action instead of free will where your desires were created from temperament which is out of your control. All motives and ideas originate from your temperament which was created by laws nature created that you must obey without your consent, therefore you cannot do not have any free will on your motives, ideas, and desires. People believe that they are a free agent because they fail to understand the true motive that causes one to perform an action.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Paul Holbach's Argument For Universal Determinism
    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Paul Holbach's Argument For Universal Determinism

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Exploiting D Holbach's Arguments
    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exploiting D Holbach's Arguments

    For d’Holbach, there is no free will. He defines will as a modification of the brain, and it is the result of the impulse that he receives from a motive, an object, or an idea. Hence, these internals are the causes to make the choice a person is making, so humans are never free. And a response by d’Holbach to indeterminists who believe in free will, he proposed an example of a thirsty dog to explain that our actions are always resulting from the causes we are encountering. These causes are navigating us even we think the opposite.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Free Will, Praise, And Blame Analysis
    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Free Will, Praise, And Blame Analysis

    The discussion of morals and moral responsibility is deep-seated in the classic philosophical repertoire. A closely related matter, and a frequent objection to moral responsibility, is determinism, the idea that given the initial state and laws of the universe, all future events and outcomes are completely determined. Over the course of this paper, I describe a particular theory for how moral responsibility can exist even in a deterministic universe. One prominent view in the realm of moral responsibility is the libertarian stance.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will Indeterminism And Libertarianism
    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Free Will Indeterminism And Libertarianism

    In the matter of free will indeterminism and libertarianism provide for the existence of such an idea. Although both account for free actions beings those in which were chosen from an array of choices that also could have been made, there is a subtle distinction between the two. The former suggests that some actions are not determined but rather due to randomness or chance and the latter suggests that those actions which are not determined are the result of free will (Chaffee 161). William James' modest perspective of libertarianism claims that because people seek to better themselves and the world around them and seek out morality proves the existence of free will. He believed that we live in a world of possibilities in which the future cannot be predicted or otherwise known until it happens.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of D Holbach's Argument
    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of D Holbach's Argument

    This argument means to show that humans have no free will since their actions are not determined by their motives. Humans will is…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will
    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Determinism And Free Will
    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Determinism And Free Will

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Relationship Between Free Will And Determinism
    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Relationship Between Free Will And Determinism

    This philosophical question is still not unsolved, but in this essay I will argue that a freedom of choice cannot be had by an agent in a deterministic world. Determinism thesis states that all events in the universe are determined by previous events. In determinism, every even is determined to happen by the laws of the the system.it is assumed that once the laws are set and the systems are decided, everyone following the event in the system is also decided. This assumption proves that humans are not free to chose how they act, but are determined by prior events over which they have no control over. The freedom that is precluded by determinism is the freedom to act without recourse to prior events, which means not having a choice determined and is able to act many different ways in any situation regardless of the cause.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Paul Holbach's Argument For Hard Determinism
    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Paul Holbach's Argument For Hard Determinism

    Some would say yes, because we are still given the choice in the first place. Others would say no because we can really only pick one thing and nothing else. Paul Holbach does not think we have free will. The basic summary of his argument is for hard determinism. Hard determinism is a view on free will which holds that determinism is true, and that it is incompatible with free will, and, therefore, that free will does not exist.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Free Will Vs. Determinism
    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Free Will Vs. Determinism

    A large and important topic in philosophy is the idea of what us, as humans, are in control of throughout our lives. Are we in control of every moment in our life, or is our life completely mapped out for us. This question leads us to two critical terms used by philosophers, free will and determinism. I will analyze these two theories and discuss different viewpoints that philosophers have regarding free will and determinism. I will explain how they interact with one another in an attempt to confirm my belief that yes, we have free will even if determinism is true.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings