Determinism And Free Will

Improved Essays
It seems that determinism are in conflict with free will. Compatibilism is a concept that free will and determinism are compatible. In this paper, I will first state the contradiction between free will and determinism, then illustrate what is compatibilism, with most of the the problem that a compatibilist would face regarding freedom.
To begin, determinism is that “human behavior is entirely governed by causal law” (Ayer, 1954, p.271). It means that every action is caused by an earlier event. As an illustration, I am writing this philosophical paper because I was enrolled in this course. Tracing back all the causal influences, my action of writing this paper is caused by events before my birth. Therefore, even if I failed in this final paper,
…show more content…
It is obvious that determinism and free will forms a contradictive relationship. If our action is causally determined, it is impossible for us to choose between options. However, compatibilist believes that there are no contradictions between determinism and free will at the same time claims that causal experience allows a person to act in a certain way which give rise to moral responsibility (Pereboom, 2014). Other than that, Richard Taylor (2002) summarize different versions of compatiblism as
(1) the deterministic concept that human behaviour is causally determined; (2) that there is freedom in voluntary behaviour, so long as there is no physical impediment or constraint upon the action; and (3) that the cause of the voluntary behaviour (which is possible in the absence of impediments or constraints) is an internal state of the agent of the action (Taylor, 2002)
The remaining parts of the paper will focus on the challenges that a compatibilist face based on the above
…show more content…
In the case, it appears that human beings are separated in different parts, brain, hands, legs, etc. Moreover, compatibilist may argue in the way that human do not need to control their genes and preference in order to have freedom. Our character and personality may be determined by our genes that is impossibility chosen by us.(Galen) But our genetic inheritance never compel us in making decision as freedom is defined as to be able to choose and act under own belief and desire which comes from who you are. Determinism is compatible with free will even if ‘who you are’ is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Freedom of the will, according to Frankfurt, is compatible with determinism; however, his inability to refute the possibility that second order desires may be predetermined allows for the conclusion that all humans truly do not possess freedom of the will and are only under the illusion that they do. In order to fully understand free will, it is important to define it. Free will is determined as the ability to choose between many options and act upon the choice chosen.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hard determinism arguing that life without free will is not bad, but, Accepting hard determinism is about inconceivable. It also argue that if people have freewill then, they do not have any moral responsibility and people were fully free to do anything. Nor is it clear that one could stop believing in free will (pg. 119-120). Whereas, libertarian is opposite to hard determinism and called indeterminism.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism. Lastly, Compatibilism or soft determinism believes that that all actions have a cause and that free will is compatible with determinism. Compatibilists according to scientist believe that freedom can be present or absent in situations for other reasons and has nothing to do with the logics behind it. Ultimately, free will exist despite the help from…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    D’Holbach is on the Materialist side of the spectrum, whereas I fall on the Dualist side and therefore I can not agree with the view that human life is reduced to the physical brain and not the free soul. The problem with d’Holbach’s viewpoint on free will is that if there is no freedom of choice or free will, then there would be no meaning in our lives. Humanity would be diminished to existing as automatic machines subjected under the orders of external factors. But, humans do have a certain amount of freedom in the Compatibilist concept of free will. In d’Holbach’s concept of free will, all is condensed to the physical brain and subject only to external influences rather than a soul, and consciousness.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People believe that they are a free agent because they fail to understand the true motive that causes one to perform an action. Free agency is defined as the absence of obstacles that influences one’s desires and motives and that a free agent can perform an action he has proposed to these objects. Holbach’s response states that it is out of one’s control to remove obstacles and to be in an environment that cannot influence your desires. This means that free agency cannot exist because it is impossible for a person to have control over their environment and the objects around them. Therefore, the objects will continue to control one’s will and desire.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Later Hegel will conclude that the principle of right, morality and ethics is the reasoning. It is what makes us human and therefore free. If the will is only free and true will in terms of thinking intelligence, a person is not a slave because he has no freedom, but because he does not think. Ignoring one's own freedom already implies not wanting it. For an individual to become aware of his slavery, he must know himself free.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will Vs Determinism

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Denial, there are two premises. Denial of the first premise in which Soft Determinist David Hume maintains that determinism is true and correlates with free will and moral responsibility (i.e. meaning that freedom of choice is only valid in moral responsibility by personal motive, regardless of casual determination). Denial of the second premise derives from Libertarian Richard Taylor, who disagrees with determinism because human actions are “uncaused” and intelligible. He uses “uncaused” as a term referring to actions not caused by factors external to the agent (i.e.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Situation comes in Part IV of Sartre’s Being and Nothingness and aims to explain how it is that one can be free in the face of the deterministic nature of our existence. This essay aims to explain how Sartre sees that there are aspects of existence which can be seen to restrict one's freedom, but under an ontological freedom these restrictions are nonexistent. These restrictions are referred to by existentialism as ‘facticitcity’ meaning the objective fact about the external world which are outside of one's control, past one's reaction to them. These facticities are categorised as My Place, My Past, My Environment, My Fellow Man, and My Death. This essay shall focus on My Past and My Death, and evaluate how both aspects are insufficient…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I gave a few examples of this being the case, but their are many more. In conclusion, if someone has free will, they are responsible for their actions because they chose them, while if someone does not have free will, they are responsible for their actions because humans have deemed it morally necessary for them to be. Even if determinism is the law of the land, that would mean that all past events and physical laws have lead to a reality where humans are deemed morally responsible for their actions. Thus, I deduce that free will is not a necessary factor in determining whether or not someone retains moral…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Additionally, as I have argued above, if free will and causal determinism were incompatible, then moral responsibility could never be assigned if causal determinism were true. Since I support soft determinism and therefore believe that causal determinism is true, I am inclined to believe that free will and causal determinism are compatible and that moral responsibility is not threatened. Moreover, although events are fixed, since they are determined by one’s character, judgments about moral responsibility are unaffected. One acts freely and in accordance with their beliefs, values, and reasons, and are therefore morally responsible even though causal determinism is true. For all of the above reasons, causal determinism does not threaten free will, despite the beliefs of…

    • 1043 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays