Determinism And Free Will

Improved Essays
It seems that determinism are in conflict with free will. Compatibilism is a concept that free will and determinism are compatible. In this paper, I will first state the contradiction between free will and determinism, then illustrate what is compatibilism, with most of the the problem that a compatibilist would face regarding freedom.
To begin, determinism is that “human behavior is entirely governed by causal law” (Ayer, 1954, p.271). It means that every action is caused by an earlier event. As an illustration, I am writing this philosophical paper because I was enrolled in this course. Tracing back all the causal influences, my action of writing this paper is caused by events before my birth. Therefore, even if I failed in this final paper,
…show more content…
It is obvious that determinism and free will forms a contradictive relationship. If our action is causally determined, it is impossible for us to choose between options. However, compatibilist believes that there are no contradictions between determinism and free will at the same time claims that causal experience allows a person to act in a certain way which give rise to moral responsibility (Pereboom, 2014). Other than that, Richard Taylor (2002) summarize different versions of compatiblism as
(1) the deterministic concept that human behaviour is causally determined; (2) that there is freedom in voluntary behaviour, so long as there is no physical impediment or constraint upon the action; and (3) that the cause of the voluntary behaviour (which is possible in the absence of impediments or constraints) is an internal state of the agent of the action (Taylor, 2002)
The remaining parts of the paper will focus on the challenges that a compatibilist face based on the above
…show more content…
In the case, it appears that human beings are separated in different parts, brain, hands, legs, etc. Moreover, compatibilist may argue in the way that human do not need to control their genes and preference in order to have freedom. Our character and personality may be determined by our genes that is impossibility chosen by us.(Galen) But our genetic inheritance never compel us in making decision as freedom is defined as to be able to choose and act under own belief and desire which comes from who you are. Determinism is compatible with free will even if ‘who you are’ is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the “Problems of Philosophy”, Chapter 9: “The Debate Over Free Will”, James Rachels and Stuart Rachels, investigate over freewill. Throughout the chapter the authors discuss what free will means and the ways to evaluate if we are free. The chapter moves towards the Free Will Argument using the Determinist Argument, the Libertarian Response, the Compatibilist Response and additionally covering the ethics involved with the chapter of free will. The chapter begins with the determinist argument which claims that everything that happens must happen, given the law of nature and the history of the universe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflicts Between Freedom and Determinism According to Ted Sider and Earl Conee, the apparent fact that conflicts with the existence of freedom of the will is that every event has a cause. This apparent fact is also known as determinism. To see why determinism conflicts with free will, the concept of cause and effect must be examined.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compatibilism vs Hard Determinism Liaa Ferede University of Minnesota Rochester Introduction Hard determinism is the belief that “all of our actions are completely causally determined by prior events” (Mondy, Hard determinism ppt, 2017) therefore our actions are not free. For instance, the way someone grew up can affect how they view the world and how they make decisions, so their action is not free because it is affected by their past. I will be objecting to this view with the compatibilism view because even though our actions are based off our past, we still have free will depending on the circumstance. I will be describing some circumstances where we do and do not have free will.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stating that two existential suppositions that have been perceived as intrinsically antithetical (in traditional social and philosophic perspectives) are actually capable of coexistence is relatively contentious, but Ayer’s justification of causal determinism incorporated with freedom of volition implements synchronous aspects of both philosophical perceptions and manifests as a logical conclusion to the activities of humans: compatibilism, the abstraction that humans possess the capacity to select subsequent events based upon their actions, but availability of such alternatives is dependent upon anterior options. An individual who is a proponent for unequivocal determinism or absolute freedom of will, would be of the contention that due to…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one rejects free will, then he is of the view that apparent fact is indeed true; this view is called hard determinism. (Sider 117) On the other hand, if one believes that determinism is false, and that human acts are free from external influence, then it is true that people act out of free will. However, some libertarians’ belief in limited causation is called agent causation; this is an attempt to resolve the problem of randomness. (Sider, 120) Compatibilism is a belief that both free will and determinism can and should indeed coexist.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, W.T Stace defends the view of compatibilism, which is also known as “soft determinism.” He argues that every event in one’s life is inevitable and is the result of past affairs, which also leads him to the belief that free will is indeed consistent with determinism. Near the end of the article he also explores the notion of moral responsibility and it’s compatibility with free will. Stace begins by briefly outlining the significance of free will because if someone has no control over their actions how can they be punished or rewarded for the way the act? He believes that many people entirely deny the concept of free will.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The implications of the free will argument and logical causality are two resultant ideas-determinism and indeterminism. Some models attempt to bridge the two ideas in a compatibilist view. According to determinism, everything was caused by some other action or combination of actions so there is no true free will. Every decision that people think was made freely was just the logical outcome of a series of prior events and factors. It was the inevitable decision and outcome whether a person recognizes…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Out with the new, bring back the old. The author of the article “The New Argument about Freedom” talks about how the old philosophical questions of “are we free’ and “are we morally responsible” should be put to bed and that new questions should be brought forward, ones that are closer to people’s hearts. She brings forward the question of whether free will and moral responsibility are compatible with determinism. She uses this question to swiftly dismiss determinism.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the theory of determinism being that one's life is solely guided by their environment and their hereditary characteristics, and free will being the philosophy that us, as humans, are free to bend our will as we please and are the sole arbiters of our choices and actions throughout our life. Ayers attempt to combine these two into a singular theory, compatibilism, is meek, to say the least. The purpose of these two philosophies are to create some sense of what it is to be a human and how we live the lives that we do, and how you can attempt to combine these two into an all encompassing term is beyond me. Ayer’s attempt is deserving of admiration as he tried to advance the philosophical way of thinking in the mid 20th century, however as this essay has made clear, the compatibilist theory just cannot withstand harsh scrutiny and collapses once one simplys defines the terms that make up the basis of his argument. Compatibilism, however as intriguing of a philosophy as it is, is incompatible with basic logic, and cannot seem to reach the necessary standpoints of truth needed to be a renowned…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter nine in Problems from Philosophy by James Rachels and Stuart Rachels titled “The Debate Over Free Will” is about the three arguments over free will. They are Determinism, Libertarianism, and Compatibilism. The Determinism argument is, as Rachels states, that our actions are manipulated by forces we cannot control. The second argument Rachels presents is Libertarianism which states that some actions we freely choose and that we are also not made to do so. The last argument is Compatibilism and according to Rachels, it states that actions are both free and determined.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This means that we as humans have freedom to respond to our circumstances and that reaction may be different then another person who faced the exact same circumstances. With free will each person has control over their own actions and their actions are voluntary. Determinism means that behavior is caused by heredity…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays