Articles Of Confederation Reaction Paper

Decent Essays
The experiences I have had with the Articles of Confederations have immensely impacted our thoughts and views on anti federalists and the Articles of Confederation. We the people of the constitution representing the federalists have recognized the faults of the Articles of Confederations. This including the lack of a Judicial branch therefore having no authority and determination of what laws are deemed ethical. As federalists we have stated in our constitution the we have one supreme court offering chances of laws and policies to be determined constitutional respectively limiting the chances of an unconstitutional law/policy passing through our Judicial system. Yes we may agree that the document the anti federalists represent is a big stepping

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The ideas and events that led to the belief that the Articles of Confederation was not working well (was because Congress had no power to regulate trade, coin money, collect taxes, or establish a military.) The Articles of Confederation was established to create the national government of the United States after the declaring independence from Great Britain. The purpose of creating the Articles of Confederation was to guarantee states of not “surrendering their sovereignty powers,” freedom, and independence (Davidson p. 152). The Articles of Confederation failed to regulate trade “Wit the outbreak of the Revolution, Americans had suffered an immediate loss of the manufactured goods, markets, and credit that Britain had formerly supplied,” (Davidson…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American History Honors Entry Assignment The Articles of Confederation could have divided the states into 13 different nation-states, but thankfully for the Constitution, the states became one nation, The United States of America. When the Articles of Confederation were first made, it “was not really much of a government at all and was never intended to be” (XI, Introduction). On July 2, 1776, when the Declaration of Independence was approved for the colonies to break away from the British Empire not as a united group but as, “‘Free and Independent States’” (XII). George Washington and others noticed the Articles would not work to keep the previous British colonies united.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the formation of the U.S. government, two different forms of government were initiated. At first, the Americans wanted to form a government that was nothing like monarchy, as they didn’t want a repeat of King George. The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1781. However, the Articles of Confederation had issues. The main issue was that the national government was too weak.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists argued that a stronger national government must be accompanied by explicit safeguards against tyranny. The Anti-Federalists supported states’ rights. 20. What were the Federalists Papers and why were they so critical to ratification of the Constitution?…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reason why the Articles of Confederation were adopted was because of the states. The states were so independent and they did not want any central authority. But, when it was time to pay war debts then it came the Constitution… For the country to be ran more smoothly there needs to be a change in the people. If we try to change the way people think than the country will run smoother.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolution is over a decade past; it’s 1787, the United States is currently using the Articles of Confederation. The recent events of Shay’s rebellion show us that the Articles of Confederation is inefficient and fails to protect people's natural rights. This raises a concern that the Articles of Confederation should be replaced by the new Constitution. We should ratify the Constitution to better protect people's natural rights. Amos Singletary, a Massachusetts representative, is against the ratification (Doc1).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was America’s first national government and it was created to establish an alliance between the thirteen states to work together. After gaining independence from Britain, America needed to come up with a strong government to lead the country. Congress wanted to change and not have a government like the Parliament which was viewed by the colonists as, “oppressive” and “brutal”. According to Document 1, article 2 states, “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled. However I personally think that the Articles of Confederation helped the thirteen colonies…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation marked the death of the 13 Colonies and the birth of the United States of America, a country of it’s own after fighting with a superpower for so long. After being controlled and constrained by Britain for centuries, the now-Americans were afraid of the government becoming a second Britain. The new American government drafted the Articles of Confederation in 1777, the first law of their new country, and to avoid creating another restrictive government, the Articles were extremely limited federally and failed to provide a strong government in terms of economics, law enforcement, and government. These issues can be shown by just a few of the restraints on the federal government: the inability to print national currency,…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A problem created by the Articles of Confederation is it limited the powers of congress. For example, Congress could not force states to follow laws and trade was not regulated between states since the state had more power than the government, Federalism divided the power between Federal/National government and the states preventing anyone from having total control giving delegation powers such as wars and treaties to the Federal government, the state reserved the rights to regulate education and issue licences, and other powers such as raising powers are shared. Separation of powers prevents any of the three branches of the Federal government from having to much power by giving each branch different jobs and powers. For example, laws are made…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787 the weak form of government brought together by the Articles of Confederation was not doing its justice for the colonists. In the Article of Confederation, there was only one branch of government, and that one branch had no power over the states. This soon proved itself to be ineffective to be a national government for the people. To remedy this problem the Founding Fathers got together at the Philadelphia Convention to discuss a new plan for the government. The Founding Fathers decided not to revise the Articles of Confederation, but to create a completely new constitution.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I chose to focus my posting on “The Federalist/ Anti-Federalist Controversy.” The controversy started after the delegates drafted the new federal Constitution. They had to draft and make a new constitution because the Articles of Confederation were weak and falling apart. The Articles of Confederation was the form of government the United States was under. When the new Constitution came out, they sent it out to the states for approval.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays