In this paper I will consider the arguments on abortion and investigate how, these debates are affecting people in different cultures. I will concede that some of these arguments do not mirror all of those who have a judgement on abortion but, rather a predisposed person. I will also argue that religious and cultural differences seem to play a role in these disputes and people’s decisions. While doing this I will discuss the difference between “pro-life and “pro-choice” as well as, the people who back each group. I will also set a hypothetical background for legal and illegal abortion. I will try to show other logical alternatives that can be taken to convince “pro-life” and “pro – choice” supporters that their ideas can coexist. As late
…show more content…
They may end up suffering the consequences as “pro – life” advocates say or they may see it as a burden lifted from their shoulders. They may be the national 10% that experience immediate complications of an abortion, such as depression, infection, and vomiting. Except they may die like Savita Halappanavar who asked for an abortion after miscarrying and was refused due to laws in Ireland. If they follow a religion such as Christianity, they may be ostracized and told they will go to Hell. On the other hand, if the women follow Judaism it may be seen as a decision that is not to be undertaken without considerable thought. Legalizing abortion could mean the surge of enraged “pro – life” supporters which could lead to a serious rebellion or people may just accept this law over …show more content…
The women may probably feel as if their option was taken away or they believe that life starts as conception. They could be a part of the 20% who think that under no circumstance that abortion should be legal. Unless they are the 40% that believe that abortion should occur under few circumstances, such as the mother’s health. Among these people could be those who consider legal abortion a botched procedure that’s killed over 300 women in the U.S. However, they may see a more detrimental option in unsafe abortion which causes the death of 220 per 100,000 women worldwide. Anti – abortionist may want physicians who perform abortion to be sentenced for manslaughter or they may discover that women could die if not treated properly by a
They may end up suffering the consequences as “pro – life” advocates say or they may see it as a burden lifted from their shoulders. They may be the national 10% that experience immediate complications of an abortion, such as depression, infection, and vomiting. Except they may die like Savita Halappanavar who asked for an abortion after miscarrying and was refused due to laws in Ireland. If they follow a religion such as Christianity, they may be ostracized and told they will go to Hell. On the other hand, if the women follow Judaism it may be seen as a decision that is not to be undertaken without considerable thought. Legalizing abortion could mean the surge of enraged “pro – life” supporters which could lead to a serious rebellion or people may just accept this law over …show more content…
The women may probably feel as if their option was taken away or they believe that life starts as conception. They could be a part of the 20% who think that under no circumstance that abortion should be legal. Unless they are the 40% that believe that abortion should occur under few circumstances, such as the mother’s health. Among these people could be those who consider legal abortion a botched procedure that’s killed over 300 women in the U.S. However, they may see a more detrimental option in unsafe abortion which causes the death of 220 per 100,000 women worldwide. Anti – abortionist may want physicians who perform abortion to be sentenced for manslaughter or they may discover that women could die if not treated properly by a