Analysis Of Abortion By Don Marquis

Improved Essays
Why is fetus not a baby?

Don Marquis sets out to prove once and for all that abortion is seriously wrong. However, in certain cases such as the form of a pregnancy that could endanger the mother’s life when the fetus is anencephalic, it can be permitted. In his argument, Marquis claims that abortion is wrong because it is wrong to kill a hermit and the loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences that would have established one’s future. I shall argue that although these claims seem to be successful, they still have errors. I suggest that abortion is permitted because the woman has the right to her body, the fetus is not a person and Marquis invalid argument about future of value. In country X where women are not granted political or civil rights; they receive only minimal education; and they are not permitted to make any important economic or social decisions regarding their lives. If the woman living in this country becomes pregnant with a healthy female fetus but she wants to abort it, its her decision. She desires to have an abortion because she does not want her daughter to grow up in a country in which females lead such restricted lives. According to Don Marquis, the mother’s decision is morally wrong. First of all, the fetus is healthy and when it is killed, it is deprived of all the future
…show more content…
In contrast, I think that the fetus is not a person as it lacks the mental states that many philosophers take to be necessary for personal identity. Since it is not the same as the person who will or would have that future, it is not morally wrong to abort. However, Marquis emphasizes that his argument avoids the concept of a person. Consequently, Marquis can respond that the fetus is the same organism as the body into which it will or would develop, even if it is not the same person. Marquis’s argument works just as well if he refers to the future of the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Don Marquis claims that abortion is immoral and therefore impermissible in most cases. I will argue that abortion is not immoral and should be permissible in all cases. Marquis says abortion is immoral because you take away the fetus’ right to a future like ours. He believes this is the same as killing an adult human, which is considered immoral. He argues that killing an adult human is wrong and the adult has the same value as a fetus then abortion is also wrong. In his paper he wants readers to agree that an adult and fetus have the same value. I am not willing to agree to that point. An adult human has had more experiences and values more than a fetus the value assigned to the fetus come from other people.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren presents her argument for abortion, first, by replying to Thomson’s argument with falsehoods she gathered from his premises. The largest opposition Warren had with Thompson, was based upon the statement he made that allowed for abortion to be permissible even if the fetus has a full right to life. Warren argues that there cannot be an argument for abortion if it is believed that a fetus has a full right to life, because an abortion would immediately dismiss this. In Warren’s argument, she focuses heavily on defining personhood and the moral status that coincides with it, and the lack of both in a fetus. I am going to argue on behalf of Warren, however adding the argument that a fetus does not have full moral status, while an infant does, in hopes to respond to the issue of infanticide.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives. The child 's mother whom is having the abortion does not know if that baby will make a change in the future, the possibilities are endless.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals. Cleary killing one of these individuals would be wrong so killing a fetus would also be wrong. In laying out his argument Marquis claims that abortion is always wrong except in…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Lee’s and Robert P. George’s, On The Wrong of Abortion, it is argued that abortions are objectively immoral. To support this conclusion, Lee and George state that, the fetus is a complete person in an immature phase of development, that the fetus has the potential to develop into a “person” and that abortions are intentional killings. Pro-Choice defenders argue that a human fetus is not a human being because it cannot live on its own, that they are not ‘people’, and that the mother has the executive decision of not wanting the child in her uterus. According to Patrick Lee in another one of his works, The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defence. Bioethics , He claims that “What makes it wrong to kill you or me now would…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one of his points he mentions the innocent-human-life perspective which states the syllogism “1. All innocent human beings have the right to life, 2. All human fetuses are innocent human beings, 3. Therefore, all human fetuses have the right to life.”. Another one of his points when arguing with singer Mary Anne Warren who stated “being a person in terms of the traits of consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, the capacity to communicate, and the presence of self-concepts, nothing, too, that her characterization of personhood” a person must have these at least some of these in order to be consider a person and therefore fetus’s lack the right to life because they don’t have these traits. Marquis argues that the way Warren’s view of personhood is wrong. He states that “if we take it quite literally, it is too narrow. Someone who is asleep is no conscious, is not reason, and is not exhibiting self-motivated activity. A final point that Marquis mention he says “individual future of value at a given age is one’s potential at that age to live to a greater age and to have a future life that on would value.” He’s saying if we get rid of that one life which is the fetus is basically taking her future value of her life away. Then goes on mentioning about P-Future of Value where if a…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subject of abortion is a highly controversial topic, with each side firmly believing that the opposing view is prima facie immoral. Much discussion regarding abortion is focused on whether or not a fetus can be categorized as a person. Many assume that if a fetus is labeled as a person, then it would be wrong to kill it; however, if a fetus has not reached personhood, then it should be fine to end its life. Judith Thomson decides to circumvent this discussion, realizing that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to determine at which point a fetus becomes a person with a right to life. For the sake of argumentation, Judith assumes that a fetus is a person. However, instead of automatically…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson Abortion Analysis

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nevertheless, Marquis states that there needs to be a clear basis in which a person has the right personhood, to know on what grounds a fetus is considered a person. Marquis goes on to say that, the reasoning for why it’s wrong to kill is because the person that was killed lost the right to a life of actions and emotion they would have had otherwise. That being said Marquis claims that all animals have a right to life as well as humans. This goes without saying that fetuses have a right to a future worth living like everyone else, even if they are not considered…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’ argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. While I agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, I do believe that in some cases it is permissible. For instance, choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances would be acceptable reasons for having an abortion. Being that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that can occur, I strongly concur with Marquis’s argument. I will first explain Marquis view and thoughts on…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Because of the moral standards of society, abortions are becoming a more controversial issue. In this paper, I intend to argue against Don Marquis’s argument that a fetus’ having a potential “future just like ours” is a sufficient statement for claiming that “abortion is, except possibly in rare cases, seriously immoral, that it is in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (p.183). I will first explain Marquis’ “future just like ours” theory which is used to prove his argument that abortion is wrong. While Marquis claims that a future is a natural property that is attached to fetuses and any human beings, I want to argue that there is a difference between future and the natural property. Second, I want to argue against his statement…

    • 1515 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marquis precedes his argument concerning the philosophical immorality of abortion by summarizing the arguments of both those who favor strict restrictions on abortion and…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is a serious issue that has been going on for years, many people don’t fully understand abortion, and why people choose to do it. Abortion is the ending of pregnancy by removing a fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the uterus. This usually is performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. There are different views on abortion, some agree and some don’t. abortions take place every single day, and yet public opinion remains at a standstill as to whether abortion is ethical or not. philosophers Mary Anne Warren and Don Marquis have different views on the morality of abortion. Warren believes abortion is not immoral and Marquis argues that it is. Pro-choice activists believe that the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis publishes his argument “Why Abortion Is Immoral” operating under the assumption that the moral status of the fetus stands or falls on the question of whether or not it is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to take. He notes that he does not argue for cases that involved special situation pregnancies like implantation or those that threaten the life of the women, but only ‘most’ cases. His argument is a significant change from many other anti-abortion arguments because Marquis attempts to distance himself from the assumption that a fetus is a person. Instead, he uses what he titles the “future-like-ours” argument. This asserts that the wrongness of killing drives from the unproblematic assumption that killing you or me is prima facie wrong. Furthermore, the reason killing you or me is wrong is because, as victims of death, we would assume the greatest possible loss of any conceivable crime. That is the loss of our future; our future holds every activity, project, experience, and enjoyment that we will ever have. Marquis continues that the…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion is one of the most controversial and heated issues in the United States today. There are two different views on this controversy. There are those who are pro-choice, whom believe that woman have the right to choose to have an abortion or not. Then, there are those who are pro-life, whom believe that a fetus should have right to life. Marry Warren, the author of “Abortion is Morally Permissible”, falls under the category of being pro-choice. She believes any law that stops woman from aborting, violates on woman basic moral rights to have control over ones own body. Warren’s staple claim is that the unborn are not human because the fetus doesn’t meet the requirements of personhood. In arguing her point as she does, the article is filled…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion remains one of the flagship intractable problems in modern ethical theory. Numerous philosophers have attempted to apply existing theories to the moral question of abortion, and have used their results to invent and refine new theories. Mary Warren and Don Marquis, ethical philosophers and writers, embody the views of the two conflicting approaches. Warren takes a highly permissive stance on abortion, arguing that abortion should be permitted at any point during pregnancy, while Marquis claims that abortion, in general, is wrong, barring exceptional circumstances. The two approaches bifurcate due to one critical assumption; who exactly has a right to life?…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics