Types of Moral imperative

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 2 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s categorical imperative commands consistent moral rules across diverse circumstances, providing the most logically consistent, although occasionally counterintuitive, basis for morality. To understand Kant’s categorical imperative, one must first understand his other ideas, particularly the hypothetical imperative and the rationality of man. Kant describes an imperative as an action that helps fulfill one’s will. Hypothetical imperatives depend on a hypothetical will that one might have.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    philosophy, there are ethical systems in place to help identify what would ideally be considered a universally accepted basis for morality. These systems follow ethical beliefs which philosophers categorize under different sets of moral rules. Two very important examples of these moral systems are Consequentialism and Deontology. They are two different strategies which attempt to identify what morality is really about by outlining the different values of what makes a good and ethical person.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    situation where picking worse, one can hurt others and the other way around. Also, the activities we perform after these reflections and contemplations are resisted as moral activities by Kant. Moral activities for him are the activities, where reasons stay sooner than takes after and…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Moral Theory makes an action right and wrong. Utilitarianism(Mill), Deontology(Kant), Virtue Ethics( Aristotle), and Care Ethics (Held) are some of the moral theories introduced by ancient great philosophers. These principles or theories are used in resolving difficulties and making the moral decisions. Mill introduced an idea of Utilitarianism, the moral worth of an action based on its consequences. Immanuel Kant’s theory of Deontology is the moral worth of an action determined by the…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer gives account that it is just right thing to do and we should give it to the point that we give up something of equal moral significance. On other hand, the Kantian approach requires us to weight whether our giving involves duty of justice or beneficence, and if we are using people as mere means to an end. In my opinion, the better choice for famine relief would be the…

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    that follow the action as a means of morality. This definition shows that this is not compatible with virtue theory, because of the omission of character traits. A moral act provides a good outcome and a immoral act will produce a bad outcome. These conclusions are formed from intrinsic means and instrumental means. There are two types of nonconsequentialist theories, these are divine command theory and…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, giving money to a homeless person just to get him/her to leave you alone would be judged not moral by Kant because it was done for the wrong reason. With Kants belief in mind; if the consequence of immoral behavior were dealt with in a legal structure, people would be prosecuted for "EVERYTHING" since there are no extenuating circumstances. Kant's categorical imperative is a tri-dynamic statement of philosophical thought:(1) "So act that the maxim of you could always hold at the…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lack Of Good Will Analysis

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    possibility that they could infect healthy people. If in this scenario the sick where killed, it would mean that someone would intentionally make the choice to kill, and because they are knowingly and willingly ending people’s lives the act cannot be moral. It does not really matter that they hoped they would save humanity, because our actions are not governed by the outcomes we hope will come about. Nobody can predict whether killing the sick people will eliminate the disease…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    what is moral and what is not? Morality consists of moral rules that you place on yourself. From research, I have learned that Kant, Mill, and Sarte all have solid views on what is right and wrong. Kant believes, “Only thing that is good without qualification is the good will.” The good will is the will to do the right thing. Only good actions are the ones you do for respect of the moral rules. Kant has two types of moral rules— categorical and hypothetical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hume Vs. Kant: Morality

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    based on his empiricist theory of the mind, is best known for asserting four theses: (1) Reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, but rather is the “slave of the passions” (see Section 3) (2) Moral distinctions are not derived from reason (see Section 4). (3) Moral distinctions are derived from the moral sentiments: feelings of approval (esteem, praise) and disapproval (blame) felt by spectators who contemplate a character trait or action (see Section 7). (4) While some virtues and vices are…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50