Theories Of Utilitarianism, Virtue Ethics, And Care Ethics

Improved Essays
A Moral Theory makes an action right and wrong. Utilitarianism(Mill), Deontology(Kant), Virtue Ethics( Aristotle), and Care Ethics (Held) are some of the moral theories introduced by ancient great philosophers. These principles or theories are used in resolving difficulties and making the moral decisions. Mill introduced an idea of Utilitarianism, the moral worth of an action based on its consequences. Immanuel Kant’s theory of Deontology is the moral worth of an action determined by the principle or law upon which action is based. Deontology is a better approach to morality than utilitarianism because an action is based on the principles, not consequences.
Deontology is also known as duty-based ethics. Immanuel Kant introduced an idea of Deontology to the
…show more content…
Kant argues that duty is based solely on reason (Kant,81). Kant believes that the act of lying, murdering, robbery are the wrong action and we have a duty not to do these things. According to Kant, consequences are not what makes an act right, but the right action makes the act right. Also, our good motives or intentions will lead us to the good path without qualification. The Categorical Imperative is the supreme principle of morality. Kant said that the categorical imperative is an imperative that requires a person to never perform an act unless he or she can will that maxim or principle that motives actions could become a universal law (Kant, 81). Kant believes that human should be treated as ends never as a means. There are two types of Deontology - act deontology and rule deontology. Act Deontology is when no ethical rules to be followed when making an ethical decision. Rule Deontology is when there are rules to be followed while making the ethical decisions. Just like a coin Deontology has two sides- advantageous side and disadvantageous side. The benefit with Deontology is that it supports an action and intention to determine the moral worth of an action. The

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Deontological beliefs are for beings who possess the capability for rational thinking and believing. Anyone who cannot do so, are not able to participate in deontological beliefs. Taking this into consideration, only rational beings can understand Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative. His categorical imperatives were broken into three different formulations. The first formulation is the fact that, we all should act as we believe that others should also act. How can we expect people to conduct themselves in a moral, duty based manner if we do not either? The second formulation is to not use people as a means. Using people as a means is exploiting them, and this is something that should never happen. This is completely realistic, because exploiting people is completely unethical. The third formulation is that, as human and rational beings, we are all one big community and we should act as such. We should all be held and hold each other to the same standard, we are all part of the rational community and must conduct ourselves as a community. “Moral principles are universal.” Which means they apply to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant has a moral sense of duty. His ideologies concept applies to a personal sense of right and wrong. Kant presents a moral dilemma that enforces the idea of circumstances. Hall critiques the claim, saying Kant often thought that the idea was to have simple pleasure and to recreate. Hall criticizes the claim that a sense of duty and morality in right and wrong are often challenged with the sense of duty. Hall criticizes the idea of over confidence and morality. Hall tends to also criticize Kant’s philosophy on rational behavior are often drastic and…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour. This term demonstrates that it “should remain…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Assignment Level 2 Unit 2

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Duty theories also called deontological or non-consequentialist speaks to human beings having clear obligations that are morally specific. For example, it is our duty as humans to care for our children and not to murder other human beings (Fieser n.d). According to Fieser (n.d) under the duty theory, there are four concepts identified. The first is by Samuel Pufendorf which is duty to God, self and others.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism and the Ethics of Care are differ greatly in their origins which dramatically affected how the systems deal with moral problems facing society; this is especially true with the Ethics of Care as it is considerably more “modern” when compared to the more traditional system of Utilitarianism. This traditional and duty driven system of producing the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people versus the compassion and empathy fueled understanding is the center of how ethics is changing and how do classical renditions of moral systems hold up over time and scrutiny.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the principle of deontology, it is an “approach to ethics focused on duties and rules” (Rich, 2016). From this perspective, violations of duties and rules, or categorical imperatives, are unacceptable regardless of the anticipated outcomes (e.g. shooting an abducted passenger plane is always an immoral thing to do and it violates the moral norm to not kill others) (Gawronski, 2016 ). Kant proposed that people should follow a universal, unconditional framework of rules as a guide to know the rightness of actions and one’s moral duties (Rich,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is the moral aspect of what someone is doing and how their emotions are going to be related to the outcome of the situation. With utilitarianism you want to have the best outcome for the largest group of people that you can. This is an example of the teleological system because the outcome is going to be natural and is going to benefit the greatest number of people. A really good example of utilitarianism is the placement of CFC on daily used household products. This allows people to know and understand that the product they are getting ready to use is going to slowly deplete the ozone layer. France made CFC propellants illegal because of the fact that the chemicals were ruining the ozone layer. I would not be one to completely follow this lifestyle because where there is good there is bad, and sometimes the outcome is not going to be the greatest reward for the most amount of…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Foundations of Metaphysics Morals, Kant explains the concept of duty. Human beings feel obliged to do certain social activities such as a parent taking a child to school. Failure to do the social activities is considered unethical. In most countries failure to perform these moral activities is illegal. In this regard, Kant argues that the central radix of morality starts with the urge of obligation (Hughes). Similarly, we may apply the concept of duty and evaluate how it affects and shapes our ordinary lives. For example, when a loved one is seriously sick and in a coma; the doctor may advise that it is better to choose for voluntary death for the patient since he will never recover. In such a case the family…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning. Lastly, Kant presents A priori ideas, which in term is a special kind of idea that tells you about the possibility of human experience, however these experiences don’t depend on experience that you have already had, but are supplied by reason in order to make sense of an…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences. Kant was a deontologist and developed an unbreakable moral code that he called the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rationally necessary, and unconditional principle that people must…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal. Moreover, as long as the moral law does not depend on our desires, it consists of what is called ‘categorical imperatives’ in Kant’s philosophical works (Gakuran…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the other hand, Deontology, also known as Kantianism, is an ethical theory based in rationalism where the motives determine the ethical value of the act, not the consequences. In deontology, Kant suggests that there are universal ethical rules that are common sense and gathered through reason, not experience (Burkhardt and Nathaniel, 32; vol. 2). Therefore, the moral rules are applicable to everyone regardless of the situation. As a result, everyone who is a person has the right to equality, privacy, veracity, and freedom. Another important aspect of deontology is the idea of humans creating their own destinies and making their own decisions. This concept is known as autonomy and emphasizes the idea that individuals should be able to act…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Derived from the Greek word deon, meaning duty, Deontology maintains that we are morally obligated to act in accordance with a certain set of principles regardless of outcome. Since the end result should not be taken into consideration, Deontology is a form of nonconsequentialism. Kant argued that the moral value of an action is determined by human will, and good will “is the only thing in the world that can be considered good without qualification” (Kant, 1785). A person must act in accordance with categorical imperatives, meaning one must do an action for the sake of the action and should will that action to become universal law.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant. His ideas, especially in contrast to utilitarianism, give a compelling explanation of why rights violations are wrong. However, in this paper I am going to argue that despite the impact Kant’s theory has made, there are still some weaknesses that should be noted.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant states that it is the Categorical Imperative ( an unqualified moral obligation that applies to all rational beings ) what helps reason provide the standard. However, Kant’s moral theory is defined as deontological where actions are determined by rules of behavior. According to Kant, we experience reason as an obligation so we act in distinct ways or imperatives which can be found in two different ways: Categorical imperative and Hypothetical Imperative.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics