Ethical System: Consequentialism And Deontology

Improved Essays
In philosophy, there are ethical systems in place to help identify what would ideally be considered a universally accepted basis for morality. These systems follow ethical beliefs which philosophers categorize under different sets of moral rules. Two very important examples of these moral systems are Consequentialism and Deontology. They are two different strategies which attempt to identify what morality is really about by outlining the different values of what makes a good and ethical person. Deontology determines morality based on laws which are followed with the intent of being a good person not to be overly concerned with consequences, whereas Consequentialism focusses more on the results, because the belief is that the end will justify …show more content…
While it is taken into consideration for a consequentialist, in Deontology it would be considered more important to focus on the person’s intention to do the right thing rather than their concern with the results. This is the most ethical way to make any decision, with the primary concern being to follow what moral and societal rules deem as the right thing to do. When a choice is made because the person understands that it is their duty to do what's right, it is much more honourable than when they do something because it will result in a good consequence. From a consequentialist’s perspective, “consequences can conceivably justify any kind of act, for it does not matter how harmful it is to some so long as it is more beneficial to others.” Utilitarianism is an example of extremely consequentialist viewpoints because it is focussed entirely on identifying which path will result in the outcome of maximum pleasure for the highest number of people. Although it could hypothetically be ideal to live in a society where the only concern is the happiness of its people, it is not realistic or moral to run a life based solely on doing what will result in the most pleasure for the most people. In Deontology, it is never okay to make a choice as merely a means to and end. This …show more content…
When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Deontology is a famous meta-ethical theory practiced among famous philosophers such as Immanuel Kant, W.D. Ross, Sissela Bok, and many other philosophers and influential people we know. Deontology is focused on “duty” based actions. The entire theory is focused on the duty of people and how they submit to the duty that they have. It is simply defined as duty is the basis of morality. It is also focused around looking at the consequential effects of a particular action that is done. Because of the belief system of deontologists, I strongly believe that deontology attains the strongest and most easily defendable argument out of all the meta-ethical theories. Opposing, utilitarianism is the belief system that morality is doing what will bring…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The term deontology comes from the Greek word deon, meaning duty.2 The theory of Deontology states that some acts are always wrong regardless of the outcome and people or society at large are judged by their actions and not the outcome of those actions. People are obligated to act within certain rules or principles and once those rules or principles are violated it is considered to be wrong, regardless how good the outcome is. Deontology provides a basis on how people are supposed to act in a society and follow certain rules. A Deontologist will always keep his promise to his fellow citizens to follow the law that governs society, because upholding that duty is considered ethically correct…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deontology is driven by the duty and righteousness of an action alone rather than the consequences. Deontologists argue that “morality is a matter of duty” (Lacewing 1) and the ethical theory can often be described as “duty-based” or “obligation-based” due to the fact that we are driven by the moral duty to do right based on a moral norm (Turner 7). This ethical theory argues the consequence or justification is irrelevant and determines an action to be right or wrong based on the action itself alone. Deontology differs from its opposing ethical theory Consequentialism, by stating that “right takes priority over good” (____). The thought trolley experiment dilemma, debates would you kill one to save five is an example of consequentialism…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this theory, it denies that the consequences of an action are the only criteria for determining the morality of an action. Under this theory, each situation may have a different scenario or outcome thus resulting in making the moral decision being a case-by-case basis. The rightness is wrongness is based on properties essential to the action, and not on the consequences. The values that one person holds could be so strong but given a different outcome of ones beliefs, it could be changed in order to adjust to the given or different situation at hand. For example, if you are on a plane and crashed on a deserted island and you are the only lone survivor, you may drop you moral belief that it is wrong to eat human flesh in order to survive. However, if you were the lone survivor in the plane crash but there was a substantial amount of food for you to survive as oppose to hitting human flesh, you would choose to eat the food. Therefore, in non-consequentialism, there a no effective hard or fast rules or guidelines that govern ethical behavior. Deontological ethics is also a form of non-consequentialism theory by Immanuel Kant which says: we have a duty of things that we are suppose to and not suppose to do. But doing the right thing may not always lead to right or increase of…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter three of Human Kindness and The Smell of Warm Croissants, philosopher Ruwen Ogien describes a thought experiment involving a surgeon, a healthy young man and five patients who need to undergo a transplant. In this scenario, the surgeon is presented with two courses of action, either kill a healthy young man to save the lives of the five patients or to let the five patients die. The purpose of this essay is to expound how two different moral theories would decide which course of action would be morally justifiable for the surgeon. After presenting the deontological and utilitarian approach to this situation, I will argue that the surgeon should take the deontological position.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory. I will argue that act consequentialism is the most plausible moral theory because it better summarizes my thought process when making a decision.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is a philosophical view or theory, about how we should evaluate a wide range of things that involve choices that people face, called the Utilitarian. Among the things that can be evaluated are actions, laws, policies, character traits, and moral codes. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it rests on the idea that it is the consequences or results of actions, laws, policies, etc. that determine whether they are good or bad, right or wrong. In general, whatever is being evaluated, we ought to choose the one that will produce the best overall results. In the language of utilitarians, we should choose the option that “maximizes utility,” that action or policy that produces the largest amount of good.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Contractualism In School

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    According to consequentialism, actions are “right” so far as they have beneficial consequences. Thus, actions, laws, policies, etc., are morally right to the degree and only to the degree that they produce some good or some useful outcome(Williams & Arrigo, 2008).…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By consequentialist ethics, the church members’ prejudice toward the poor and their body language to despise him were not ethical actions. It’s because consequences determine the right or wrong actions. Their reaction didn’t produce the best results but the death of the poor man. Its consequence didn’t bring happiness to anyone. Consequentialist utilize an evaluation of results while deontological ethics utilize rule and principles (Hollinger 28).…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    2. Deontology: It more focuses on moral duties rather than consequences. If someone acts immorally but it brings good consequence, this action will be regarded as immoral.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology equates rightness (morality) or wrongness (amorality) of action with adherence to or contravention of a specific moral code as determined by society. Deontology draws inspiration from Immanuel Kant’s theory of Categorical Imperative. This Imperative, in short, states that one should only act on universal moral principles; that is, principles which are deontologically moral in action that ought to and can be applied to and practiced by everyone, everywhere, at all times in order to create the most good or happiness for the most people. One good thing about this theory, and Deontology as a whole, is that they promote the greatest good for as many people as possible as most people being happy is more favorable than only a few people being happy.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main opposing theme, as mentioned earlier, is that utilitarianism is more consequence-oriented in character, whilst deontology is not. Fundamentally, this might lead to disastrous consequences in deontology and utilitarians would further argue that the outcome of ten deaths is much less desirable than one.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Over many centuries, ethics helped build the foundation of the laws we abide by today. Ethics are moral principles that control a person’s behavior/actions. Ethics is also known as moral philosophy, which is a branch of philosophy that rises up questions about morality. For instances, questions like is it good or bad, right or wrong, justice or crime. There are many types of ethics, one well-known type of ethic is normative ethics. Normative ethics is a type of ethics that looks in to arising questions and tells you how to act during the situation.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the other hand, Deontology, also known as Kantianism, is an ethical theory based in rationalism where the motives determine the ethical value of the act, not the consequences. In deontology, Kant suggests that there are universal ethical rules that are common sense and gathered through reason, not experience (Burkhardt and Nathaniel, 32; vol. 2). Therefore, the moral rules are applicable to everyone regardless of the situation. As a result, everyone who is a person has the right to equality, privacy, veracity, and freedom. Another important aspect of deontology is the idea of humans creating their own destinies and making their own decisions. This concept is known as autonomy and emphasizes the idea that individuals should be able to act…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays