Types of Moral imperative

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 5 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory, where actions are judged right or wrong solely by virtue of their consequences which was introduced by Jeremy Bentham and later carried out by John Stuart Mill (Kemerling,2011). In regards to the consequences the only importance is the amount of happiness or unhappiness that was produced. In regards to utilitarianism it is believed that everyone counts as one, and no one counts as less or more than another person. And that a person should do…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident. Kant states that an action has moral worth if and only if it is done from duty and does…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2010). Therefore, the questions that result from moral philosophy include; what should one do or not do? What will be the effect of one’s actions to others? Is it justified to do what one wants to do? The response to these questions allows an individual to decide on the type of affiliation that he or she should establish with those within his or her vicinity (Solomon & Higgins, 2010). However, some philosophers such as Immanuel Kant hold that moral philosophy is based on the idea of good will,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duty In Kant's Duties

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1300 Philosophy 1300 Section Test #2 According to Kant, what is singular about motivation by duty is that it consists of bare respect for the moral law. Duties are rules or laws of some sort combined with some sort of felt constraint or incentive on our choices. It’s almost like an obligation by the Categorical Imperative. But Kant draws a distinction between the duties of perfect and imperfect. But Kant states, Perfect duties come in the form “One must never (or always) φ to…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    rules and duties. Adherence to this obligations and rules is regarded as ethically right. TYPES OF DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS Different types of deontological ethical theories are: • Duty theories: an action is considered morally right if it is in accordance with some list of duties and obligations • Contractarianism: an action is considered morally right if it in accordance with the rules that rational moral agents would agree to observe when entering into a social relationship for mutual benefit.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It follows then that an individual’s actions are counted as being moral or immoral by how useful those actions are to the majority of people. There is no law or universal rule that trumps the fact that a larger quantity of people are seen as more useful than a smaller quantity from a utilitarian perspective. Similarly, John Stuart Mill would justify his recommendation to Jim in accordance to the theory of consequentialism or determining whether an action is right or wrong by analyzing the…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will set out to prove that Mill’s belief that our moral imperative is to maximize net happiness without accounting for equal distribution, regardless of certain individuals’ happiness, is incorrect. It will be shown that Mill’s argument system for deciding this is flawed, and that it lacks vital definitions that determine the basis of the argument. This essay concludes that without these proper definitions for happiness or pleasure, and without a way of quantifying these, it is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    deontological moral theory. The latter stressed the absolute or “exceptionless” nature of moral rules, together with the irrelevance of consequences or feelings in the assessment of moral judgments. As a strong deontologist Kant opposed to all forms of consequentialism. He also opposed to any type of non-cognitivist in ethical theory, particularly the form advocated by the 18th century Scottish philosopher, David Hume, who view moral judgments as expressions of a special kind of “moral sense”…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    of the categorical imperative, [“Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law” (Kant 37)], Kant establishes some universal laws that follow from it. In light of his previous discussion of the importance of good will—namely that a good will is the only thing good without limitation, Kant additionally considers the relationship between our will and the universal laws that spring from the categorical imperative. Kant suggests the…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle Vs Kant Essay

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    of the main differences is that Aristotle connects good acts with virtue and Kant proposes that a good will is good in itself and not because of its accomplishments. The highest morals of a person’s life rest on the good will. (2012) Thus, all individuals of good will achieve complete their actions using the greatest moral worth. According to Aristotle, if a person is to be virtuous always in his or her actions he would have to tell lies at some time so that he can reach a mean of his actions.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50