• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/40

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

40 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Where do new market pressures come from?

- Structural changes in the industries


- Technological innovations


- Convergence of consumer tastes, globally


- Political/legislative changes


- Global media and communications

Strengths of Product-Market grouping

- allows units to adapt flexibly to difference in products, regions, clients


- suitable for rapid changes in unstable environments


- Client satisfaction because the client knows exactly where to go


- Excellent coordination


- Decentralized decision making




Best for large companies with several product lines

Weaknesses of Product-Market grouping

- prevents economies of scale in functional departments


- prevents the development of in-depth knowledge in functional competences and technical specialization


- difficult to integrate functions and standardize processes across product lines


- poor coordination across product lines

Strengths of functional grouping

- economies of scale in functional competences


- allows for the development of in-depth knowledge in functional areas


- brings together experts who speak the same language


- facilitates standardization of processes


- Simpler


- Helps the organization fulfill its functional objectives


- promotes specialization

Weaknesses of functional grouping

- poor horizonal coordination across departments (difficult to handle various product and service lines; processes across functions cause alterations)


- Slow response time to changes in the environment


- Decisions pile up; hierarchy overload


- Different departments have different priorities and they may only care about their own bottom line, ignoring the bigger picture. It promotes a narrow and restrictive view of organizational objectives.



When do structures get transformed?

- When there is growth


- When there is differentiation of products, markets, customers


- Where communications channels have been saturated

Tell me about the invention of brand management and why its important in the context of organizations

n/a

Strengths of the Matrix structure

Achieves coordination necessary to meet dual demands from customers


- Flexible sharing of human resources


- Suited for complex decisions and frequent changes in unstable environments


- Provides opportunity for both functional and product skill development

What two variables distinguish structures?

Height and width


Extent to which hierarchical management is observed

What factors does the height of an organization encompass?

- Number of layers within a structure


- Complexity of tasks proposed in a strategy


- Facilitates the engagement of specialist managers

What factors does the width of an organization encompass?

- Refers to centralization or de-centralization



What are the trade-offs between the costs and benefits associated with the width of an organization?

- advantages of centralization: tighter direct control; better for smaller organizations with few product or market segments


- advantages of decentralization: you can develop localized and specialized knowledge when you operate in several markets

What factors does the contingency approach depend on?

- nature of business and strategy


- size


- geographical span of activities


- age/history


- culture


- leadership style

Configuration approach?

- job specialization


- span of control


- need for formalization


- centralization vs decentralization


- unit grouping (function vs market served)




*seeks to proactively determine the structure that the organization should adopt*

Tell me about export departments

- Found in companies in early stages of internationalization. Foreign sales are minimal and foreign markets are supplied mainly through domestic production and exports.


- Knowledge of foreign markets is concentrated in a single department


- Weaknesses: conflicts will arise between domestically oriented product divisions and export department regarding whats more important: domestic sales or exports; export department is dependent on domestic product divisions for both product and technology.



Mother-Daughter structures

- suited for new foreign investors where foreign operations ar enot of crucial importance to the parent company; and suited for businesses with extensive FDIs but limited central resources


- Advantage: encourages subsidiary innovation by substituting their autonomy for centralized control


- Disadvantage: lack of global coordination and planning

International divisional structure

- Majority of US and some japanese and euro companies


- Strengths and weaknesses similar to export department


- International knowledge and expertise is concentrated in one division





Advantages of Global Matrix structure

- Advantage: you can achieve both global coordination and national responsiveness


- Main advantage: can accommodate managers with worldwide product responsibilities for particular businesses AND accommodate country managers responsible for specific area markets

Disadvantage of Global Matrix structure

- overlapping responsibilities


- duplications of: reporting, information, communications and activities


- excessive time spent on reaching compomised decisions


- increased administrative costs



How can companies improve their flow of innovation? How can they enhance that process?

Combining technical know-how and market knowledge and expertise


- can enhance by looking far and wide, rather than just locally.

According to the reading "Is your innovation process global?" what is a key challenge for companies?

Accessing sufficiently diverse knowledge

Tell me about geographic lodes of knowledge and how they can happen

- different countries have developed different expertise due to necessity. For example: High cost of land in Japan has forced companies to become experts in JIT production to minimize inventory.


- Increasing dispersion of knowledge is also a result of globalization of supply chains.


- as companies transfer knowledge to new locations through subsidiaries, new pools of competencies will develop at those sites



Tell me about one advantage of metanational innovation. Hint: cost


What is a challenge associated with this?

- Even if knowledge from overseas is similar to that available closer to home, the cost of utilizing the distant knowledge may be cheaper. EX: Software programmers in Bangalore rather than Silicon Valley.


- These sites lack the full complement of necessary knowledge

How do you achieve the benefits of metanational innovation?

Prospect: find relevent pockets of knowledge from around the world


Assess: decide on the optimal footprint for a particular innovation


Mobilize: use cost effective mechanisms to move the distant knowledge without degrading it



How can companies move these knowledge?

Internet


relocation of staff



Tell me about prospecting

- know what to look for


- where to look for it


- how to tap into it


- Sheseido wanted to get into perfumery so it bought two exclusive beauty boutique chains in Paris to experience first-hand the demands of sophisticated customers. It also hired the marketing manager of YSL.



Which organizational model is this?

Decentralized federation: many key assets, responsibilities, and decisions are decentralized


- Informal HQ sub relations overlaid with simple financial controls


- Management regards operations as a portfolio of independent businesses



Which organizational model is this/

Most strategic assets, resources and responsibilities and decisions are centralized


- Tight central control of decisions, resources, and info


- Management regards overseas operations as delivery pipelines to a unified global market


- subsidiaries have limited freedom to create or even modify products


- less understanding of local specificities



Which organizational model is this?

Parent retains considerable influence and control, but less than a global company


- Products and technology is developed for the home market and extended to other countries with similar market characteristics, then diffused elsewhere


- Formal management planning and control systems allow tighter HQ sub linkage


- Management regards overseas operations as appendages to central domestic operation





What does the choice of an organizational model depend on?

Industry


- consumer tastes


- available technology


- competitors behaviour


- Government regulations


- economics of production

Characteristics of a transnational model?

efficiency to achieve global competitiveness


- local responsiveness to achieve flexibility


- selective centralization:


---> some capabilities centralized at HQ for protection of core competencies


--> some capabilities centralized at subsidiaries


--> Some capabilities decentralized for local responsiveness


- complex configuration of assets and capabilities


- Network integration through strong interdependencies


- Slack designed into production for flexibility


- Systematic differentiation of roles and responsibilities


- Management of multiple subsidiary roles is very important

Whats a blackhole subsidiary?

If the level of local resources and capabilities is low and the strategic importance of the local environment is low.

Whats a Strategic leader subsidiary?

If the level of local resources and capabilities is high and the strategic importance of the local environment is low.

What is an implementer subsidiary?

If the level of local resources and capabilities is low and the strategic importance of the local environment is low.

What is a contributor subsidiary?

If the level of local resources and capabilities is high and the strategic importance of the local environment is low.

What are the 3 coordination mechanisms of global companies?

Centralization


Formalization


Socialization

Drawbacks of coordination by centralization?

- Decision making system overload (HQ is in charge of everything; theres bureaucracy; cant respond in time)


- Loss of sensitivity to local needs


- Potential for strain and resentment

Drawbacks of coordination by formalization?

- Rigidity


- control and enforcement costs can outwigh operational efficiency gains


- Policies can become corporate dogma at the expense of customer needs


- Managers cant be creative and innovative


- high fixed costs of establishing the systems rules and policies

Drawbacks of coordination by socialization?

- expensive because it requires intensive indoctrination and training


- decision making slower and ambiguous


-

What coordination mechanism goes with global structure? with multinational? with internationa?

Centralization; socialization; formalization