Also in schools teachers revisit previous learning (or schema) to build on any gaps in knowledge and solidify the learning. So one can agree with Piaget’s theory that learning is constructive and requires cognitive maturation, but only to a certain extent. Learning can be constructive as children do build on previous knowledge but then the question arises whether this learning would occur as effectively without the aid of others, as this theory suggests. I believe not, for the reason that children would not learn without the knowledge being presented to them by a teacher in a manner that they can understand. In my opinion Piaget’s idea of biological maturation does not account for exceeding pupils, who are achieving and understanding concepts above their age. This can be viewed as a flaw that may, ultimately, limit progression. For the reason that those children may not be challenged with more difficult concepts as they are not of the age to understand
Also in schools teachers revisit previous learning (or schema) to build on any gaps in knowledge and solidify the learning. So one can agree with Piaget’s theory that learning is constructive and requires cognitive maturation, but only to a certain extent. Learning can be constructive as children do build on previous knowledge but then the question arises whether this learning would occur as effectively without the aid of others, as this theory suggests. I believe not, for the reason that children would not learn without the knowledge being presented to them by a teacher in a manner that they can understand. In my opinion Piaget’s idea of biological maturation does not account for exceeding pupils, who are achieving and understanding concepts above their age. This can be viewed as a flaw that may, ultimately, limit progression. For the reason that those children may not be challenged with more difficult concepts as they are not of the age to understand