Justice And Justice In Kallipolis

Improved Essays
Kallipolis is a perfectly structured society in which justice is achieved at the social and interpersonal realms. It is ruled by a philosopher king, who maintain the peace and harmony in the ideal society. According to Plato in The Republic, the philosopher king possesses the qualities to be the rightful king to rule in Kallipolis. Philosophers are qualified to rule because they have a understanding of the Forms or the truth, their wisdom allows them to understand justice and their knowledge makes them superior than others. However, a philosopher can be a tyrant in disguise. A ruler needs to be able to interpret the nature of the world in order to rule a just state. Allegory of the cave is used to explain the formation of the philosopher. …show more content…
Plato’s myth of metals divides the society into three sections: the gold, the rulers; sliver, the auxiliaries and iron or bronze, the craftsmen or framers (Plato, Book III). The society functions because there is existence of four important virtues in the society, which is wisdom, courage, temperance and justice. Wisdom is dominant characteristic in the rulers, whereas courage is dominated in the auxiliaries (Plato, Book IV). Temperance is needed to control desires and pleasures. Rulers naturally are more temperance and temperance is needed to keep harmony between all classes. “It turns out that this doing one’s own work - provided that is comes to be in a certain way - is justice” (Plato, 433b). Justice is a helpful tool to preserve all four virtues in the soul. Nonetheless, the soul is divided into three different parts: rational part, spirited part and appetitive part. These aspects of mind correspond to the three classes of the state. Reason must be permitted to rule over the spirited element and rule over the passions, thus to secure justice (Plato, Book IV). Plato argues that philosopher kings are the reigning class because of their rare characteristics that makes them the rulers. The tripartite division of characteristic in the human mind showed that the each individual possess a characteristic that defines the individual and their occupation has best equipped to the person to pursue. …show more content…
A philosopher is superior in virtue because of the love for wisdom and strives for the truth, hence the rational part rules the soul. Plato argues that the philosophers are born with the philosophical nature, which involves courage, high mined, quick learners, know to retain information, just, moderation and graceful with their thoughts (Plato, Book VI). Their love for learning about the Forms and striving for the truth by denying falsehood. “A soul that is always reaching out to grab everything that is divine and human as a whole” (Plato, 486a). This shows that they know there are more important things, that has been revealed to their high mind. They do not fear death because they possess courage. Philosophers experience moderation because they have abandoned the pleasures of the body and are only concerned with the pleasure of the soul. They are not money lovers or bashful because they are aware of just. Philosophers are naturally inclined to learn, able to retain information and their thoughts are gracefully measured (Plato, Book VI). The philosopher’s nature has the proper aspects to be a ruler. These philosophical nature can be explained using the simile of the ship. This simile shows the a philosopher is rightful for its place. The wise man, the navigator of the ship knows better than the rest about navigating the ship. The navigators’ knowledge extends to the needs of the people and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy For The State In the Apology of Socrates and Republic, it is argued that philosophy is beneficial for the state. Advantageous can be considered an outcome that is profitable. A state is an area controlled by a ruler. Therefore, the question is whether philosophy is a reasonable method of ruling an area and in what ways.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Gorgias, Socrates argues against Polus an ancient Greek orator, that tyrants and orators do not, in fact do what they want, instead they do what they see fit. As a result of this claim, Socrates believes tyrants and orators have the least power in their cities. This paper will primarily argue Socrates’s views through the definition of power, who holds the “real” power, that some things are inherently bad, and that there are different views of morality. The argument that Socrates sets forth states “If a person does whatever he sees most fit to do when he lacks intelligence, is this still ‘having power?’”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He knows the craft of navigation but is dismissed as a useless stargazer. The good philosopher, like the one in the analogy, is disregarded because he seeks truth and not power or fame. The city will continue to be run by power hungry knack politicians until a true philosopher comes into power. The only problem with this notion is that a true philosopher can only be produced in an ideal city and an ideal city can only be run by a true philosopher. Plato’s republic is a self-sustaining system and Socrates shows that it is incredibly difficult to escape false…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are three classes of citizens in the state: the craftspeople, the auxiliaries, and the rulers. According to Aristotle, justice in the state is these three classes doing what the are naturally inclined to do and not meddling in the others natural craft*(434d). The craftspeople build and create, the auxiliaries defend the city, and the rulers rule. Similarly, there are three parts in the soul: the rational part, which rules the whole of the soul; the spirited part, which dictates our passions and carries through what the rational part declares; and the appetitive part, which desires. Justice in the soul is each part of the soul doing what it is supposed to be doing.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only way to resolve the tension between appearance and reality is to allow those with knowledge the power to rule and decide and allow those without to continue living ignorantly in the appearance of reality, which is all they know. In Plato’s Republic, Socrates wants for a world ruled by Philosopher kings in order to have “political power and philosophy...blended together” (473D). He believes that it is them alone who are capable of…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    He will tell the citizens the gods assigned them to their class because they are best suited for that job. The rulers would have gold in them, the soldiers would have silver, and the craftsmen would have iron or bronze. It is, however, possible for them to move from one class to another. This is mentioned because Plato understands that it is possible, for example, for a craftsman’s son to have the abilities to become a soldier or vice versa. The last virtue is of course justice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This philosophical analysis will define the themes of civic loyalty and “virtu” in the qualities of a good citizen and good leader in the political systems of Socrates and Machiavelli. For Socrates, the notion of civic loyalty (to the gods, military, and laws of the state) is defined in the qualities of a good citizen and leader to serve the greater good of the state. In a similar manner, Machiavelli presents the ideology of “virtu” as a guide to create a good citizen, and more importantly, a good leader, such as a prince, to serve a lawful state. However, Machiavelli tends to define “virtu” as showing the characteristics of ruthless leadership through princely governance, which countermands the less-authoritarian aspects of the Socratic republic.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato uses this Allegory to comment on the polis of the Greek-Athenian society. People should spend less time in this “world of unknown” because enlightenment is much more promising. Plato suggests that philosophers should be the leader of politics because they have the most knowledge and can use their knowledge to generate proper justice. It is their duties, as the they obtain to report back to society and connect the people with the government. As…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Republic and Machiavelli’s The Prince depict their views of both the duties and the ideal personas that rulers should strive towards. Socrates, in Republic, strives to discover truth in the creation of a hypothetical “perfect city,” in which all citizens are just and fair to each other. His Philosopher King was designed to rule this ideal city, and as such this is a perfect and ideal figure. Having been educated only in the just for his whole life, this Philosopher King is always virtuous, and relies purely on this virtue to be a good ruler for his people.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following paper will be discussing Plato's perspective on the philosopher-kings and what makes them the best rulers. I will use examples from the text Plato, Republic to describe Plato's ideal city which will demonstrate Plato's true definition of justice and why no city can be just unless it is ruled by a philosopher-king. Through explaining Plato's ideal city this will aid in concluding why Plato believes philosopher-kings are the best fit to rule in order to truly have a just society. In the text Plato, Republic Plato is discussing human behaviour, most prominently the trait of justice.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature and politics are inseparable. Raw, overpowering, and mighty, human nature is the dynamic force that drives political discourse. While Sophocles’ Antigone and Thucydides’ On Justice, Power, and Human Nature appear to be simply two independent works of antiquity, both convey timeless teaching on human nature. These interconnected lessons are relevant in modern political leadership and serve as a guide for moderation, justice, and engagement.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates, in Plato’s words, was pure and wise because he admitted his own ignorance. Despite this, Plato knows that humans are bound to do wrong and instead presents philosophy as a way to improve a person’s life. It is up…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Politics 1301 a2) And in an oligarchy, “the poor are few, and the masters of the rich who outnumber them.” (Politics 1290 a4) Plato believed that philosophers should rule as kings because they were seen as the ones to make the right decisions in the just city for they possessed the right…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allegory of the Cave” is a philosophical parable or analogy from Plato’s The Republic, written around 380 BC. Exploring themes of knowledge, perception, and the importance of education, it takes the form of a discussion between Plato’s brother, Glaucon, and his teacher and mentor, Socrates. Although this dialogue was almost certainly scripted by Plato, it is not clear whether the idea itself is Plato’s own or his record of Socrates’s thoughts. The allegory begins with Plato’s Socrates describing a group of humans held in a deep, dark cave. They have been imprisoned there since childhood, their necks and legs bound so they cannot turn to see themselves, each other, or the rest of the cave.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato believes that philosophers are superior in intelligence, and therefore philosopher-kings should rule over…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays