The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

Superior Essays
Register to read the introduction… Socrates expresses that,“…is it because of the spirited part…that we call a single individual courageous (Plato 99).” It can be found if one has courage in the spirited part. In the state, the soldiers represent courage. They fight and defend for their city. They obey the rulers and are their allies. To ensure that the rulers and soldiers will fight for their city; Socrates proposed a noble lie to maintain the city’s justice. He will try to persuade the rulers and soldiers that they do not have parents but rather they were born from the earth. The earth is their mother and all the citizens of the city are brothers and sisters. Therefore if anyone attacks them they must fight back and defend their …show more content…
A ruler is self-controlled if one’s reason is in charge and the other two parts of the mind do not interfere with the reason. The same is for the state. The rulers rule the state, the soldiers protect the state, and the craftsmen perform their individual trade. The classes should carry out their specific duties and not interfere with one another. To make sure that the classes will act upon their own tasks, Socrates also included this in the noble lie. He will tell the citizens the gods assigned them to their class because they are best suited for that job. The rulers would have gold in them, the soldiers would have silver, and the craftsmen would have iron or bronze. It is, however, possible for them to move from one class to another. This is mentioned because Plato understands that it is possible, for example, for a craftsman’s son to have the abilities to become a soldier or vice versa.

The last virtue is of course justice. Justice can be described as “minding your own business.” The state and the ruler is just when its three classes or parts execute its own duties and do not interfere with each other. Therefore, injustice must be the opposite or as Socrates says, “…it must be a kind of civil war between the three parts, a meddling and doing of another’s work, a rebellion by some part against the whole soul in order to rule it inappropriately (Plato

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Both Machiavelli and Socrates want to promote their version of a good state. To Socrates, this is a state where the leaders and citizens act with dignity and morality constantly challenging common thought. In contrast, the prince acts as the guardian of Machiavelli’s ideal state doing whatever he can to ensure prosperity in his nation. The prince may at times take actions that are not considered moral, but he does so to maintain order and stability. The value of a prince in Machiavelli’s society could not be understated, he was “to secure himself against enemies, to gain friends, to conquer by force or fraud, to make himself beloved and feared by the people, followed and revered by the soldiers, to destroy those who can and may injure him” (The Prince, 30).…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But because a “Philosopher King” is always seeking knowledge that knowledge would help decide the difference between just and unjust actions. Because an unjust action such as war can cause chaos. Plato wants to create an ideal state where the prince is enlightening his people and interacts with them in order to ensure they become virtuous and enlightened. In conclusion it is important to be just rather than unjust because their is no good reason to be unjust. Doing one unjust deed snowball effects more unjust deeds.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He means anything that a ruler thinks is good is justice. Rulers proceed ruling power to control and make laws for their cities; hence, what rulers think is just for people under their authority is justice. Therefore, if a person disobey any law he receives punishment for acting unjustly. Then Socrates shows humans are fallible, liable to make mistakes, and so are the rulers. Thrasymachus claims that a ruler to the extent he is a ruler does not make mistakes, so the ruler decides what is good for him and the subjects should carry out his order.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In considering escaping Athens to avoid his unjust death Socrates voices the Laws of Athens’ reason: “…if we try to destroy you, thinking this to be just, you will then try to destroy us the laws and your homeland in return with as much power as you have and claim that you're acting justly in doing so, the man who truly cares about virtue?” (Plato 7). Socrates upholds that the Laws establish a social contract with all citizens in a society, no matter their political or social standing. Socrates would argue that the Prince is cannot declare himself as the rule of law since this form of contract excludes himself and would therefore not be held accountable for any of the violent acts he…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato proposes that each division has a virtue that coincides with their economic status. The status of a ruler, for example, must have a virtue that is based off of wisdom. For this reason, Plato created a school for rulers that banned anything that could distract the young people from the overall goal of obtaining “The Good”. The…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato introduces the concept of the noble lie to ensure that the citizens are obedient and cooperative. Socrates explains that, “it’s appropriate for rulers… to lie for the benefit of the city” (389b). The noble lie tells the story how each person’s soul determines their position in society. Bronze souls are the producers, silver souls make up the auxiliary class and philosophers have a gold soul. This lie tells members of society what their natural duty is; the gods decided their fate and they must act accordingly.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ruler is given the opportunity to justly govern his people and also to understand what needs to be done to better their world. If one were to rule without this understanding or ability to value the truth, no matter how undesirable that may be, the fate of the ruler and his society would be harmed. It is important that philosopher kings be able to distinguish true from false in order to achieve an ideal society in which no one is taught lies and no one lives in the shadow of falsehoods. Additionally, a philosopher king is in touch with the theory of Forms and thus allows him to have a greater level of knowledge, placing him as more just than others. To further the allegory’s implications, if a ruler were to be inside of the cave and unaware of the intelligible realm, the ruling he would proceed to do and the decisions he would proceed to make would be as useless to fulfilling his…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, workers are born to work, soldiers are born to fight and rulers are naturally gifted and smart. On top of that, the three classes have to only do their job and play their role. They should not try to change roles or play other’s roles. Plato believes that once people try to take others’ jobs the state would become unjust because the rulers would start to do work, soldiers and workers would want power. On the other hand, I believe that by doing that, the only person in Plato’s just state that would be happy is the ruler because he has total power and complete control of the state.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A philosopher Plato lived in the time of kings and the institution of the first Republic. But even the most powerful civilizations fall due to problems that suffocate the people’s voices and the society’s strength. Plato tried to discreetly propose solutions to nation’s problems by writing a text called, “The Republic of Plato”. The text details a city that would maximise function and create balance. While writing, he spoke through a fellow philosopher, known as Socrates, to avoid conflict with people in power who would be offended by his comments.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play Oedipus the king, by Sophocles, and in Poetics, by Aristotle, Oedipus was described as a good moral character. He showed major determination to save the city of Thebes. He did all he can in his power to overcome the obstacles and was ready to do anything asked from the oracle of Delphi. Even hurting himself was not a problem because all he cared was to protect the city of Thebes. Therefore, Oedipus’ decisions of making the city his priority reveal him to be a good moral character.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays