The Importance Of Justice In Plato's Crito

Improved Essays
Justice can have many meanings when put into different perspectives. Throughout Crito, by Plato, Socrates has to determine whether to escape prison or stay. Socrates was initially charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in gods. He argued his case in jury and did not choose the alternate punishment, exile, which could have saved his life. He was then given a death sentence and he was imprisoned until his execution. Crito tries to convince Socrates to escape, but Socrates brings justice into the picture and he has to explain to Crito why his decision to stay in prison is just and pious. It is often questioned whether justice was served in the case of Socrates, but taking into account the meaning of justice perceived through …show more content…
Socrates defends his case for justice against Crito when Crito says he is being unjust by ruining him and his friends' reputations. Socrates believes that justice is not determined by the opinion of the majority. Crito explains to Socrates how he will ruin his reputation when he says, "Not only will I be deprived of a friend, the like of whom I shall never find again, but many people who do not know you or me very well will think that I could have saved you if I were willing to spend money, but I did not care to do so. Surely there can be no worse reputation than to be thought to value money more highly than one's friends, for the majority will not believe that you yourself were not willing to leave prison while we were eager for you to do so" (47). Crito is selfish by thinking about the majority's opinions rather than the big picture about justice and piety. Justice is not about what others think about you, it is about what is right in …show more content…
He tells Crito the hypothetical conversation he would have with the state if he were to escape. Socrates believes that the state would tell him that, "One must obey the commands of one's city and country, nor persuade it as the nature of justice. It is impious to bring violence to bear against your mother or father; it is more so to use it against your country" (54). Since it is a Greek value to put the state over everything, Socrates should not value his life over the state. The state raised Socrates, and he had the opportunity his whole life to leave the state if he were unhappy, however he did not. He liked the state for their justice system, their laws, and their lifestyle. Since he chose to reside in the state, he must abide by the rules, for this is justice. To disrespect the country is to do the utmost

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Socrates, more than most, ought to be as per this agreement, as he has carried on seventy years completely content with the Athenian lifestyle. If Socrates somehow managed to break from jail now, having so reliably approved the social contract, he would be making himself a bandit who might not be welcome in some other enlightened state for whatever is left of his life. Furthermore, when he bites the dust, he will be cruelly judged in the underworld for carrying on shamefully towards his city's laws. Subsequently, Socrates persuades Crito that it would be better not to endeavor a getaway.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main theme of the book of Crito is about whether should Socrates break the law and escape from execution or stay and accept his death penalty. At the very end, Socrates pointed out that trying to escape breaks the law, and any act that breaks the law is unjust . Therefore, Socrates refused to escape and decided to accept his death penalty and execution. Socrates responded each of the three arguments Crito brought out. However, are Socrates’ arguments reasonable and is it always right to obey the law regarding the law itself is morally justice or injustice?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates, the classical Greek philosopher and one of the founders of western philosophy, was accused by the people of being an atheist and corrupting the youth with his ideas. He was, then put into trial in which the jury decided that he was guilty, and finally he was sentenced to death. While being in the prison, waiting for the execution process, Crito, one of Socrates’ friends, came to visit him offering a plan by which Socrates can escape from prison before the day of his execution. However, Socrates refused to escape the death sentence. A large argument took place between Socrates and Crito concerning whether Socrates shall escape or not.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He knows if he refuses to escape prison that he will have a good defense when he stands before the dead who will see him as a victim of injustice not from the law but injustice from those who abused the law. Crito and Socrates flow of the arguments goes Living Well Argument- to do an unjust action ruin one's soul, Life is not worth living with a ruined soul, and hence the most important thing is not life but living a moral and just life. Consequences for Athens Argument- if I escape from jail, then the laws of Athens and thus the city of Athens will be destroyed. To destroy the laws of Athens and the city of Athens harms the citizens of Athens.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Socrates is has a strong moral, and ethical compass which is depicted through each of the stories. Even though Socrates was wrongly convicted, he was determined to stay in jail instead of escaping with Crito. Most people would jump at the opportunity to escape their wrongful death, and a new beginning. Socrates is able to stay level headed and understand how his escape would create more consequences for him. Cirto brings up the point that leaving his sons without a father is wrong, but Socrates reminds Crito that he would be doing worse by making his sons have a criminal for a father.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is also faced with a decision to follow the unjust law in escaping jail or the just law in remaining and facing death. Conflicted, Socrates explores the meaning of just and unjust laws. King explores similar terrains in asking the question, "How can you advocate breaking the laws and obeying others? " In the end, Socrates convinces Crito that it would be best to remain in jail and not attempt an escape.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Chicago cop cleared in unarmed woman’s shooting death”. Headlines just like this are becoming common in today’s society and the main question that the community asks is “when will justice be served?” Living in a time where the black community keeps getting shot by the police and no consequences occur, we have no choice but to question, what is justice? Similar to the modern society, the one Plato lived in confronted this same question of justice. In this paper I will attempt to explain the view that Plato places before us through Socrates in The Republic as to what is justice and does it “pay” better than injustice in society.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates refuses Crito’s invitation to escape because by doing so he breaks the laws of Athens. Socrates explains to Crito that by exiling himself he not only breaks one law, he breaks them all; this is due to the fact that as a citizen you support the laws, and breaking one law would end your endorsement. These laws carry great importance to Socrates, because by escaping he breaks the law from which he was fostered, educated, and begat his children. By exiling himself, Socrates cannot enter other states; considering he broke the laws of Athens, other states would see him as a fugitive. Furthermore, Socrates he explains that he would not greedily risk his children’s Athenian citizenship in order to save his life; he also states that even the…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the text, Crito, a man by the name of Socrates is put in jail for a crime he did not commit. He is urged by another, named Crito, to escape from jail as it is unfair for him to be locked away for something he did not do. Although, Socrates firmly believes he should stay and face the time rather than escape. It is unjust for him to escape because he will spend his life running with no place to go and settle down, he will destroy the laws, and he should not do wrong just because wrong was done to him. It is unjust for Socrates to escape from jail because he will be running from the law without having anywhere to go.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even if he is innocent, he believes that his name will always be placed to the society that he followed the law and just. Having both arguments, Socrates manages to convince Crito with his point of view. Socrates argument was stronger than Crito’s one. Compendium 1…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Voice of the Law Socrates is a man who questions what is morally correct and always expands our views and perspective on what it truly means to live. As he talks to Crito in his cell towards the date of his execution, Socrates discusses the importance of being a citizen of Athens. Although Crito tries to convince Socrates to escape, Socrates analyzes his reasons for staying or escaping. Crito is an important scene because it shows Socrate 's rational and thinking process as he is given the two choices, to escape and leave or to face death.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Crito, Plato illustrates Socrates in a complete contrast to the image that the reader captured in The Apology. In the dialogue between Crito and Socrates, Crito tries to convince Socrates that escaping out of jail is the right the thing to do. Crito first argues by explaining that it would be wrong for Socrates to throw his life away in prison because if he decides to remain in prison then he will be doing exactly what his enemies intended to do. Crito continues his argument by explaining that if he were to remain in jail he will be silenced, thus, Socrates would be conspiring with other people who are trying to do something unethical. Crito continues by brining forth Socrates’ children and how they would be affected and would be left without a father, however, Socrates isn’t convinced by Crito’s…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Crito, a dialogue written by Plato, the Greek philosopher Socrates is sentenced to death because of corrupting the youth, creating new gods, and being an atheist. Centuries later, another prominent figure, Martin Luther King, Jr., is jailed for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963. When questioned of their imprisonment, Plato and King, Jr. are both determined to maintain justice despite the injustices charged against them, but for Plato, justice means upholding the law at all costs since one should do no wrong, whereas King is concerned with reforming the law, therefore doing wrong could make a “right”. To both King and Socrates, a portion of injustice in law damages justice as a whole.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays