The Importance Of Justice In Plato's Crito

Improved Essays
Justice can have many meanings when put into different perspectives. Throughout Crito, by Plato, Socrates has to determine whether to escape prison or stay. Socrates was initially charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in gods. He argued his case in jury and did not choose the alternate punishment, exile, which could have saved his life. He was then given a death sentence and he was imprisoned until his execution. Crito tries to convince Socrates to escape, but Socrates brings justice into the picture and he has to explain to Crito why his decision to stay in prison is just and pious. It is often questioned whether justice was served in the case of Socrates, but taking into account the meaning of justice perceived through …show more content…
Socrates defends his case for justice against Crito when Crito says he is being unjust by ruining him and his friends' reputations. Socrates believes that justice is not determined by the opinion of the majority. Crito explains to Socrates how he will ruin his reputation when he says, "Not only will I be deprived of a friend, the like of whom I shall never find again, but many people who do not know you or me very well will think that I could have saved you if I were willing to spend money, but I did not care to do so. Surely there can be no worse reputation than to be thought to value money more highly than one's friends, for the majority will not believe that you yourself were not willing to leave prison while we were eager for you to do so" (47). Crito is selfish by thinking about the majority's opinions rather than the big picture about justice and piety. Justice is not about what others think about you, it is about what is right in …show more content…
He tells Crito the hypothetical conversation he would have with the state if he were to escape. Socrates believes that the state would tell him that, "One must obey the commands of one's city and country, nor persuade it as the nature of justice. It is impious to bring violence to bear against your mother or father; it is more so to use it against your country" (54). Since it is a Greek value to put the state over everything, Socrates should not value his life over the state. The state raised Socrates, and he had the opportunity his whole life to leave the state if he were unhappy, however he did not. He liked the state for their justice system, their laws, and their lifestyle. Since he chose to reside in the state, he must abide by the rules, for this is justice. To disrespect the country is to do the utmost

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Socrates, like all men, seeks the good. If he and others embrace something other than the good, it cannot be because they voluntarily and willfully turn their backs on it” (Zuckert 228). It is also unjust because one of the accusers, Anytus whose son wanted to follow Socrates, did not allow his son to do so and so his son became an alcoholic. He blamed Socrates and used this as another example of Socrates corrupting the youth. Socrates was not corrupting the youth, but his teachings taught to question everything because you cannot be sure of anything.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crito Socrates Summary

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He cannot do this and break the principle for which he has been stood all his life. However, Crito is not quite convinced about all these because he still believes that Socrates is a victim of an unjust law; reason why Crito believe that it is right for Socrates to disobey the law. Socrates reminds Crito that by taking such an action would be a situation of returning evil for evil. This situation will not only harm his soul and corrupt oneself but will harm the other person as well. It is clear that escape is not in Socrates agenda since he has never believe that by doing two unjust, will make one just.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Resistance as a civic virtue Laws are not standard. They changes from state to state and obviously from country to country. Athenians judicial system condemned to death a man for having different beliefs than theirs and based in Apology and Crito by Plato in this essay I claim that Socrates’ acceptance of death under a failing judicial system is unvirtuous although he tries to picture it as a virtuous and civic act. His aberration for obeying the outcome of his trial becomes pointless because if he wants to be virtuous he must go against the system showing resistance. Socrates has to continue fighting back the unfair system that condemns him and convince others to join his cause Should we follow the many or the one?…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Thrasymachus could define justice in a better way than Socrates then Socrates would owe him money. Socrates then tries to explain to Thrasymachus that he does not have any money so he cannot accept the challenge. Glaucon assures Socrates that he does have money and he will be behind him every step of the way. Socrates does not understand why Thrasymachus would want to challenge him, for he never stated that he had an answer for what justice mean. Thrasymachus accuses Socrates of being the kind of person that learns from others instead of giving his own opinion and trying to teach others.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates never said that his ideas were right to anything, but I feel that Socrates felt the law of Athens was unfair and needed to be changed and so it led to Socrates trying to stand up for the better good that he believed in and giving his life during the trial. “For this fear of death is indeed the pretence of wisdom, and not real wisdom, being the appearance of knowing the unknown; since no one knows whether death, which they in their fear apprehend to be the greatest evil, may not be the greatest good.”. I believe that he does not care exactly how it will be changed if the problems goes away after the change. I feel the fact that Socrates fully knows well, there is a good chance he will be put on trial and be sentenced to death if he breaks the laws of worshipping other gods than Athens and corrupting the youth. However, his goal was to exploit these problems and the best way to do that was through demonstration.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Apology Socrates is accused of being an atheist and corrupting the youth by Meletus, and other people who Socrates “tested their wisdom”. They are strongly offended by Socrates’ words, and decided to bring Socrates to this trial to get him punished. Socrates has defended himself, and he is not guilty of any accuses. However, the jurors, on behalf of the whole citizen body of Athens, decide that Socrates is guilty, and the punishment is a death penalty rather than an exile. Behind this death penalty, Socrates seems to prefer this than an exile, because he does not want to live in a society that he cannot do what he wants to do.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cirto brings up the point that leaving his sons without a father is wrong, but Socrates reminds Crito that he would be doing worse by making his sons have a criminal for a father. Also he would be breaking everything Socrates stands for because he would break the social construct that he believed in, and become a hypocrite, by defying what he taught. By repaying evil with evil you are not achieving anything. This depicting how much Socrates focuses on being true to your moral values, and being ethical. Socrates also displayed his ability to question and not be so narrow minded.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    44) Socrates warns the people of Athens that the intimidation and framing of him by his accusers, he will not acknowledge due to his firm understanding of himself not committing any crimes by the way he chooses to live. In Socrates’ view the mortality and “goodness” that an individual has overweighs the evils that challenge and attempt to hurt them as it is something he believes strongly in and even in death a good soul can’t be…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His first attempt seems slightly selfish. He doesn’t want to be given the bad reputation that he doesn’t care about his friends, or that he was unwilling to spend the money to finance an escape for Socrates. Socrates retorts that he and Crito should not care about the opinion of those who would believe Crito was too selfish to help his friend, as the only people whose opinion they should be considering are those who would uphold what is just.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Trial Case Study

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates obviously knew this because he agreed to the social contract at adulthood. Socrates chose to stay in Athens and willingly obey to the Laws of Athens. It would also be contradictory for him to escape because he declined exile when it was presented to him at will, and then leave Athens when the Laws did not allow him to do so. Carl: But it was Meletus, and the public that accused Socrates so if the people are wronging Socrates unjustly, that means that they are wronging him in a way that is not in accordance with the Laws. Thus, Socrates should not be breaking the Laws in trying to break free from…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays