Comparing Platos Republic Vs. Machiavelli's The Prince

Superior Essays
Plato’s Republic and Machiavelli’s The Prince depict their views of both the duties and the ideal personas that rulers should strive towards. Socrates, in Republic, strives to discover truth in the creation of a hypothetical “perfect city,” in which all citizens are just and fair to each other. His Philosopher King was designed to rule this ideal city, and as such this is a perfect and ideal figure. Having been educated only in the just for his whole life, this Philosopher King is always virtuous, and relies purely on this virtue to be a good ruler for his people. Machiavelli’s Prince is a more morally ambiguous ruler; though he does not look down upon the just, and in fact praises and strives towards it whenever possible, the Prince does not fear committing harsh deeds and ordering unjust acts if he determines that doing so will further the interests and prosperity of his state and his people. He is trained primarily in the art of war, and places the …show more content…
Plato’s Philosopher Kings are raised from birth to be virtuous, and protect the state by ensuring that justice would be considered in the settling of any dispute. Their citizens understand that the ruler will protect them, and they inherently trust him for the morality by which he guides his life. The idealistic leader is a perfect ruler for a just society at peace, as he will always consider the wants of the people and the fairness of his behavior. The Prince may attempt to be moral in his actions, but in a more realist take on the nature of the state, Machiavelli states that virtue should always fall second to war. Actions that seem at their surface to be impossible cruel are justified if they provide safety and security to the people of the state. Stability for the people of the state is always the goal of a ruler, whether by the utmost consideration of morality, or by any means

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Both Machiavelli and Socrates want to promote their version of a good state. To Socrates, this is a state where the leaders and citizens act with dignity and morality constantly challenging common thought. In contrast, the prince acts as the guardian of Machiavelli’s ideal state doing whatever he can to ensure prosperity in his nation. The prince may at times take actions that are not considered moral, but he does so to maintain order and stability. The value of a prince in Machiavelli’s society could not be understated, he was “to secure himself against enemies, to gain friends, to conquer by force or fraud, to make himself beloved and feared by the people, followed and revered by the soldiers, to destroy those who can and may injure him” (The Prince, 30).…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If morality is defined as a demarcation between good and evil, then there must be something to say about the importance of valuing the goodness of one’s nation over its destruction. Having already established that Machiavelli makes decisions that favor the majority, one can conclude that his tactics are indirectly moral. Machiavelli consistently delivers his people the necessary resources in order for his civilization to flourish. It is not that Machiavelli completely disregards morality; he would be foolish to do so. Rather, he values the importance of success, which ultimately leads to goodness.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I firmly believe Caesar knew was he was getting into and had he survived, would not have failed his government. He was an active military man who conquered territories and from this he received financial aid. Machiavelli’s ideal prince is not always realistic in all circumstances. In order to be favored by the people, one must be liberal to an extent, as long as one is clever enough to be able to moderate one’s expenses when needed. From the book, The Prince, I learned that Machiavelli often chooses a cool, logical perspective that mostly concentrates on his ideal prince remaining in power for as long as he can.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The most important character for a successful ruler is de which means virtue, and it can influence others. Kongzi compares the sage king to the Pole Star in the Analects and says “one who rules through the power of Virtue is analogous to the Pole Star: it simply remains in its place and receives the homage of the myriad lesser starts. (Analects, 2.1)” When a ruler tries to use non-action to govern the state, the highest achievement is like the position of the Pole Star. By fully understanding the meaning of non-action, people will follow the ruler faithfully while the ruler is doing nothing. Furthermore, Kongzi emphasizes several times that in order to rule the state by using the idea of non-action, the ruler must correct his own behavior first.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Lao Tzu’s ‘‘Thought from the Tao-te Ching’’and Machiavelli’s ‘‘The Quality of prince’’, they both develop how an outstanding ruler should be by striking a balance between the people and the ruler. Lao Tzu believes since human nature is a part of the holistic universe, all human beings should follow the Way in order to be original people. If the ruler is enlightened by the Way and Tao, he will not try to compete with others because the ruler realizes everything is ought to be moderate and appropriate for his people. Thus, Lao Tzu thinks that the ruler should be tolerant and flexible. However, Machiavelli insists that human nature is selfish and superficial.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates valued individual characteristics considered to be moral and just more than anything. He was not afraid to place leaders to the same standard as the ordinary citizen and in fact encouraged this as a sign of healthy government. Machiavelli valued the characteristics that he categorized under the adjective “virtu”, characteristics which were meant to create leaders who yield concrete results. Often however, “virtu” shows disregard for human…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ruler is given the opportunity to justly govern his people and also to understand what needs to be done to better their world. If one were to rule without this understanding or ability to value the truth, no matter how undesirable that may be, the fate of the ruler and his society would be harmed. It is important that philosopher kings be able to distinguish true from false in order to achieve an ideal society in which no one is taught lies and no one lives in the shadow of falsehoods. Additionally, a philosopher king is in touch with the theory of Forms and thus allows him to have a greater level of knowledge, placing him as more just than others. To further the allegory’s implications, if a ruler were to be inside of the cave and unaware of the intelligible realm, the ruling he would proceed to do and the decisions he would proceed to make would be as useless to fulfilling his…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confucius taught on an ideal ruler for the process of government. This ruler would be superior in their integrity and morality, and would be an example to others, in order to cultivate their own morality. A good ruler would seek to correct his subjects with love and concern rather than punishment and coercion. Furthermore, he explained that traditions were more important in molding the ideals of the people, rather than laws. He even put forth, “If the people be led by laws, and uniformity among them be sought by punishments, they will try to escape punishment and have no sense of shame.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We also go on to learn that people are the best to listen to because they will offer you the best protection in times of war and will best keep you in power if you do what they need and want. In fact going as far as to state that with the support of the people one can make due without a frotrest. Machiavelli also highly stresses the importance of obtaining fine ministers and gives an example of how to do so "But how a prince may recognize the minister, there is a mode which never fails. When you see the minister think more of himself than of you, and that he seeks what is useful to him in all actions, someone made that way will never be a good minister, never will you be able to trust him: because whoever has another 's state in his hand must never think of himself but always of the prince..." He believes obtaining ministers that put the ruler above himself and this is both evident by his words and action. In conclusion, I believe the Prince was quite educational and a great read in the general.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    King, however, holds a more realistic and relatable stance within society. King believes that it is his responsibility to fight against injustice in a nonviolent, morally correct, fact based, planned, polite, and respectful way. When compared to Plato and Thoreau, King’s stance is most relatable because of his ability to skillfully and respectfully take a stand for what he believe is right for society as a whole while properly acknowledging opposing arguments. If we could all do our part ad a citizen within society and react with a level head and with the facts, like King, the world would truly be a better place for…

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays