(2001) sought to identify the source of cellphone intervention during driving (Strayer et al., 2001, p. 464). The participants completed the driving simulation on both an easy course and difficult course. After being introduced to the simulator, the participants completed the course in single task condition and then in two dual –task conditions using a cellphone. One of the dual task was participants repeating words that were asked of them by the confederate over the hand held cellphone. The other dual task was similar to first task, yet participants had to create a new word that began with the last letter of the word the confederate told them. The purpose of Experiment 2 was to measure “deviations from the ideal tracking position”, (Strayer et al., 2001, p. 465) assuming that risk could be increased while driving with a cellphone due to these
(2001) sought to identify the source of cellphone intervention during driving (Strayer et al., 2001, p. 464). The participants completed the driving simulation on both an easy course and difficult course. After being introduced to the simulator, the participants completed the course in single task condition and then in two dual –task conditions using a cellphone. One of the dual task was participants repeating words that were asked of them by the confederate over the hand held cellphone. The other dual task was similar to first task, yet participants had to create a new word that began with the last letter of the word the confederate told them. The purpose of Experiment 2 was to measure “deviations from the ideal tracking position”, (Strayer et al., 2001, p. 465) assuming that risk could be increased while driving with a cellphone due to these