Why Did The South Lose The Civil War Analysis

Improved Essays
Why Did The South Lose The Civil War?
The primary reason why the South lost the Civil War was because of their insistence upon retaining democratic liberties during wartime. The Union’s victory was then achieved because of their ability to suppress certain liberties for the greater good of the people. For instance, the Southern soldiers were disobedient and overconfident because the little guy had been able to achieve amazing victories in previous wars. However, the South lacked the leadership that allowed for the militarial feats to occur. Another example is that the South kept freedom of speech and allowed news papers to slander the South as well as publicize their military plans and strategies. Due to overconfident soldiers and the preservation
…show more content…
They looked at Caesar, Hannibal, Alexander, Turenne and Frederick the Great as examples of forces that were able to win despite the odds being stacked against them. (Military Leadership of North and South) However, they did not make the necessary sacrifices that it would have taken to win the war and did not have the brilliant leaders that had allowed Caesar and the others to win. The North did not have incredible military leaders either, but they were still more competent and experienced. One of the generals, Sherman, was positive that they had an advantage over the South with regard to who had the better leaders. Sherman once blurted out to a fellow officer: "I am a damned sight smarter than Grant; I know a great deal more about war, military history, strategy and grand tactics than he does....” (Military Leadership of North and South) Sherman recognized that the Northern military leaders were smarter and knew what it would take to win the Civil war. The Northern leaders were smart enough to prohibit freedom of speech and other liberties to keep the soldiers obedient and disciplined. They won the war due to the superiority of the Northern leaders and their ability to suspend certain liberties, the advantage that allowed the little guy to win in the past, that the South

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While America may have fought many wars before the Civil War, the Civil War was unique in that the two opposing sides of the war were parts of America in disagreement. The North, and The South. Against tremendous odds and opposition, the North won this Civil War and gave us the union we have today. But how did they accomplish this tremendous feat? The short answer, General Ulysses S Grant's competence as a military leader, the advantage of greater man and industrial power, and the leadership of President Lincoln.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it was assisted by the lack of resources that the Confederacy possessed as they struggled to maintain any kind of stability within its economy, the lack of cooperation throughout the South’s military and its inability to make decisions politically that would assist the cause. It was also due to Grant’s ability to build good relationships with many of his generals, particularly Sherman, and the President was key to his success within the war. As the historian T. Harry Williams stated, “There is no difficulty in composing a final evaluation of Ulysses S. Grant. With him there be no balancing and qualifying, no ifs and buts. He won battles and campaigns, and he struck the blow that won the war.”…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South Vs South Summary

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The South vs. The South William Freehling, The South vs. The South. (New York, NY: Oxford University, 2001) William W. Freehling is an American historian, and Professor of History and Otis A. Singletary Chair in Humanities at the University of Kentucky, and is the author of The Road to Disunion, Volume I: Disunionists at Bay, 1776 – 1854, which won the Owsley Prize. William Freehling's The South vs. The South book is two hundred and thirty-eight pages and divided into ten chapters.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example that Donald gives is the unwillingness of the soldiers to carry anything heavy and they would throw away equipment. The South did not have the luxury to leave behind any weapons and that played into the hands of having limited resources. Other…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to T. H. Williams, the North won the Civil war because they “brought forward generals who were able to grow” and would employ new ways of war. Although Civil war generals trained at West Point together and grew up in the same establishment, some were more successful than others hence Grant and Sherman having the ability to adapt. In the Civil war, there were only three important generals: Lee, Grant, and Sherman. They were great leaders since they were mentally tough and did not care much for casualties since they were big in numbers. The greatest among those three was Grant due to his common sense since it made “him able to rise above military dogma.”…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The South losing the civil war was almost inevitable due to the fact that they had less of almost all resources, The confederates were out populated and the North had higher skilled leaders. Victory was nearly guaranteed for the North due to the Union having more resources. During the war the north had 120,000 factories while the south only had 21,000. With the greater amount of production they were able produce more weapons such as guns and cannons which contributed to the war effort.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both the Union and the Confederacy had many different strategies and advantages in hopes that they could use them and win the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln would lead the Union and Jefferson Davis would act as the leader of the Confederacy. At the begging of the war, the Union was the favorite to win it all. The Union had many more weapons, soldiers, and resources than the Confederacy. The Union was also able to win the first battle of the war, the battle of Bull Run, which was another advantage for the fleet.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is plentiful discourse as to why the Northern Union won the Civil War in 1865 against the Southern Confederacy. Although the military leadership from Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant in the North and Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee in the South both impacted the outcome, Jefferson Davis’s poor political leadership both as president and commander in chief led to the Northern victory, particularly his defective judgements regarding military affairs and his moderate leadership as president that yielded tenuous relations with the Confederate people. According to David M. Potter, Jefferson Davis was not fit to command the Confederate Army. He was “his own secretary of war and his own general in chief” in which he included departmentalization…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third and final question was (War has been termed the continuation of politics by other means. Judging by these documents, what key political conflicts shaped the Civil War? After reading the weekly readings, I chose to answer the second question,…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fort Sumter Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jefferson Davis decision to take the fort showed his strength and devotion to the Confederate States, and efficiently coerced other states to join his cause. However, President Lincoln displayed his brilliant tactics by holding his ground in regards to the Constitution and by entrapping the Confederate soldiers to be the aggressors or to be seen as weak. Without a doubt, both the Union and the Confederates were led by ingenious…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The south had a small military force in which the north was able to overcome the force. The north had a bigger advantage is that the north had more industrial power in which they could produce more products to the military. Which was able to get ammo and their ammunition to the troops while they are fighting in the civil war. The north had more money as well which they were able to buy more supplies from their supplies and ship them to them to the troops. The north had also had more railroads which allowed them to be able to transport more troops, food, water, and supplies so they can keep the war in their favor.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the South, losing the war meant the abolishment of slavery. The stakes in the war increased heavily for both sides following the…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War: Why the North Prevailed. When any two sides look to engage in a war, both sides believe they can win. In the Civil war between the Northern America and Southern America; Known as the Union and Confederacy respectively. There were many ways in which the South was already defeated from the start. In nearly every practical resource for war the Union enjoyed a distinct advantage.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sherman's Total War

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Through Sherman’s tactic of total warfare the Union guaranteed their victory. His precise plan to lead a destructive march to the sea and through the Carolinas was very important. Conventional warfare would not have won the North’s victory. Total warfare struck fear into the hearts of the women and children of the south, and terrorized the soldiers. It brought the Confederacy to its knees.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    General “Stonewall” Jackson led the Confederacy to victory. From the start of the rivalry, if war were to break out, the North was in favor to win quickly and easily due to their industrialized lifestyle and well-developed economy. Before General Lee decided to side with the Confederacy, he said, “Lieutenant Green, I want you to pick out a dozen men, good men… I will prepare a message to the insurrectionists, which you will deliver. When they accept the terms, the marines will move in quickly and subdue the men, removing their weapons.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays